Defensive Programming Pattern Enforcement
(Redirected from defensive programming pattern enforcement)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
A Defensive Programming Pattern Enforcement is a programming pattern enforcement that systematically applies defensive coding practices to prevent runtime failures through proactive validation and graceful degradation.
- AKA: Defensive Coding Pattern Enforcement, Fail-Safe Programming Enforcement, Robust Programming Pattern Enforcement, Safety-First Programming Enforcement.
- Context:
- It can typically implement input validation at all function boundarys.
- It can typically enforce fail-gracefully principles with fallback mechanisms.
- It can often add precondition checks and postcondition assertions.
- It can often ensure comprehensive error logging for debugging support.
- It can range from being a Manual Defensive Programming Pattern Enforcement to being an Automated Defensive Programming Pattern Enforcement, depending on its enforcement method.
- It can range from being a Compile-Time Defensive Programming Pattern Enforcement to being a Runtime Defensive Programming Pattern Enforcement, depending on its enforcement timing.
- It can range from being a Minimal Defensive Programming Pattern Enforcement to being a Comprehensive Defensive Programming Pattern Enforcement, depending on its coverage level.
- It can range from being a Performance-Conscious Defensive Programming Pattern Enforcement to being a Safety-First Defensive Programming Pattern Enforcement, depending on its priority balance.
- It can create wrapper classes for unsafe operation encapsulation.
- It can generate defensive programming test cases for robustness validation.
- ...
- Examples:
- Counter-Examples:
- Offensive Programming, which fails fast and loud rather than gracefully.
- Optimistic Programming, which assumes success cases rather than failure modes.
- Performance Optimization, which prioritizes speed over safety checks.
- See: Programming Pattern Enforcement, Defensive Programming, Null Dereference Pattern Detection Task, Error Handling Standardization System, Code Enhancement Suggestion, Software Bug Pattern, Preventive Code Maintenance Process, Input Validation Bug Pattern Analysis, Software Quality Improvement System.