AI Product Management Proposal Evaluation Criterion

An AI Product Management Proposal Evaluation Criterion is an AI Product Management Criterion that assesses proposed AI features or AI products against multiple evaluation gates, such as feasibility, future-proofing, performance, and aesthetic quality.

• AKA: AI Product Proposal Gate, AI PM Evaluation Framework, AI Product Gate Criterion.
• Context:
  • It can (typically) check technical feasibility by consulting the AI research trajectory and available AI model capabilitys.
  • It can (typically) evaluate future-proofing to ensure the proposal will remain relevant when the AI product launches.
  • It can (typically) assess the expected AI latency-capability trade-offs to determine user experience.
  • It can (typically) include taste and aesthetics as a criterion, rejecting proposals that add complexity without clear benefit.
  • It can (typically) incorporate business viability assessments alongside technical evaluations.
  • ...
  • It can (often) utilize scoring rubrics to standardize proposal evaluations across teams.
  • It can (often) require prototype validation before full approval.
  • It can (often) include user research requirements in the evaluation process.
  • It can (often) mandate risk assessments for AI-specific concerns like bias and privacy.
  • ...
  • It can range from being a Single-Gate AI Product Management Proposal Evaluation Criterion to being a Multi-Gate AI Product Management Proposal Evaluation Criterion, depending on its evaluation complexity.
  • It can range from being a Lenient AI Product Management Proposal Evaluation Criterion to being a Strict AI Product Management Proposal Evaluation Criterion, depending on its approval threshold.
  • It can range from being a Speed-Focused AI Product Management Proposal Evaluation Criterion to being a Quality-Focused AI Product Management Proposal Evaluation Criterion, depending on its evaluation priority.
  • It can range from being a Quantitative AI Product Management Proposal Evaluation Criterion to being a Qualitative AI Product Management Proposal Evaluation Criterion, depending on its assessment method.
  • It can range from being a Static AI Product Management Proposal Evaluation Criterion to being a Adaptive AI Product Management Proposal Evaluation Criterion, depending on its criterion evolution.
  • ...
  • It can integrate with AI Product Roadmaps for strategic alignment.
  • It can support AI Product Portfolio Management through resource allocation guidance.
  • It can enable AI Innovation Management through structured evaluation.
  • It can facilitate Cross-Functional Collaboration through shared evaluation frameworks.
  • ...
• Example(s):
  • Product managers using the AI Product Management Proposal Evaluation Criterion to reject a feature requiring real-time image recognition because research indicates the necessary AI model will not be ready within the release timeframe.
  • PM teams applying a multi-gate evaluation to a proposal for voice-controlled 3D editing, considering feasibility, user delight, and future model upgrades.
  • Innovation committees using structured criterions to compare multiple AI feature proposals for resource allocation.
  • ...
• Counter-Example(s):
  • Approving new AI features based solely on personal preference without structured evaluation.
  • Evaluating proposals only on technical novelty without considering user experience or cost.
  • Ad-hoc Decision Making that lacks consistent evaluation criterions across projects.
• See: Product Requirements Document, AI Product Roadmap, Technology Readiness Level, Stage-Gate Process, Innovation Management Framework, AI Product Management Approach, Decision Support System.

---