Chain-of-Thought (CoT) Prompting Method

A Chain-of-Thought (CoT) Prompting Method is a prompt engineering method that requires the LLM to express their reply as chained reasoning.

• Context:
  • It can range from being a Zero-Shot CoT Prompting Method to being a One-Shot CoT Prompting Method.
  • It can be a cognitive intervention technique that prompts individuals to generate a chain of related thoughts to improve memory and problem-solving skills.
  • …
• Example(s):
  • One-Shot CoT Prompting, such as:
  • Think-Step-by-Step Prompting.
  • …
• Counter-Example(s):
  • Tree of Thought (ToT).
  • Example-Conditioned Generation Method,
  • Single-Prompt Method.
• See: PromptChainer, Soft Prompt Tuning, Automatic Prompt Engineering (APE).

---

---

References

2023

• (Wikipedia, 2023) ⇒ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prompt_engineering#Chain-of-thought Retrieved:2023-5-11.
  • Chain-of-thought prompting (CoT) improves the reasoning ability of LLMs by prompting them to generate a series of intermediate steps that lead to the final answer of a multi-step problem. The technique was first proposed by Google researchers in 2022.

    LLMs that are trained on large amounts of text using deep learning methods can generate output that resembles human-generated text. While LLMs show impressive performance on various natural language tasks, they still face difficulties with some reasoning tasks that require logical thinking and multiple steps to solve, such as arithmetic or commonsense reasoning questions. To address this challenge, CoT prompting prompts the model to produce intermediate reasoning steps before giving the final answer to a multi-step problem.

    For example, given the question “Q: The cafeteria had 23 apples. If they used 20 to make lunch and bought 6 more, how many apples do they have?”, a CoT prompt might induce the LLM to answer with steps of reasoning that mimic a train of thought like “A: The cafeteria had 23 apples originally. They used 20 to make lunch. So they had 23 - 20 = 3. They bought 6 more apples, so they have 3 + 6 = 9. The answer is 9.”

    Chain-of-thought prompting improves the performance of LLMs on average on both arithmetic and commonsense tasks in comparison to standard prompting methods. When applied to PaLM, a 540B parameter language model, CoT prompting significantly aided the model, allowing it to perform comparably with task-specific fine-tuned models on several tasks, even setting a new state of the art at the time on the GSM8K mathematical reasoning benchmark.

    CoT prompting is an emergent property of model scale, meaning it works better with larger and more powerful language models. It is possible to fine-tune models on CoT reasoning datasets to enhance this capability further and stimulate better interpretability.

  • There are two main methods to elicit chain-of-thought reasoning: few-shot prompting and zero-shot prompting. The initial proposition of CoT prompting demonstrated few-shot prompting, wherein at least one example of a question paired with proper human-written CoT reasoning is prepended to the prompt. It is also possible to elicit similar reasoning and performance gain with zero-shot prompting, which can be as simple as appending to the prompt the words "Let's think step-by-step". This allows for better scaling as one no longer needs to prompt engineer specific CoT prompts for each task to get the corresponding boost in performance.

2022

• (Wang et al., 2022) ⇒ Xuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc Le, Ed Chi, and Denny Zhou. (2022). “Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.11171

2022

• https://ai.googleblog.com/2022/05/language-models-perform-reasoning-via.html
  • QUOTE: ... In chain of thought prompting (below, right), the model is prompted to produce intermediate reasoning steps before giving the final answer to a multi-step problem. The idea is that a model-generated chain of thought would mimic an intuitive thought process when working through a multi-step reasoning problem. ...
  • 

2022

• (Kojima et al., 2022) ⇒ Takeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo, and Yusuke Iwasawa. (2022). “Large Language Models Are Zero-shot Reasoners.” In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35.

2022

• (Wei, Wang et al., 2022) ⇒ Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma, Ed Chi, Quoc Le, and Denny Zhou. (2022). “Chain of Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models.” In: arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.11903. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2201.11903
  • QUOTE: ... We explore how generating a chain of thought -- a series of intermediate reasoning steps -- significantly improves the ability of large language models to perform complex reasoning. In particular, we show how such reasoning abilities emerge naturally in sufficiently large language models via a simple method called chain of thought prompting, where a few chain of thought demonstrations are provided as exemplars in prompting. Experiments on three large language models show that chain of thought prompting improves performance on a range of arithmetic, commonsense, and symbolic reasoning tasks. The empirical gains can be striking. ...

---