LLM-as-Judge-based NLG Performance Measure

A LLM-as-Judge-based NLG Performance Measure is a model-based natural language generation (NLG) performance measure that employs large language models to evaluate NLG system outputs through automated quality assessments based on evaluation criteria and scoring rubrics.

• AKA: LLM-as-Judge NLG Metric, LLM-based NLG Evaluation Measure, Neural Judge NLG Performance Measure, LLM Evaluator Metric.
• Context:
  • It can typically assess NLG output quality through LLM-based scoring using predefined evaluation prompts.
  • It can typically evaluate NLG semantic correctness through LLM comprehension analysis of generated content.
  • It can typically measure NLG task alignment through LLM-based criteria matching against task specifications.
  • It can often provide NLG detailed feedback through LLM-generated explanations beyond numeric scores.
  • It can often support multi-dimensional NLG evaluation through simultaneous assessment of multiple quality aspects.
  • It can often enable reference-free NLG evaluation through LLM judgments without requiring gold standard references.
  • It can often facilitate scalable NLG evaluation through automated LLM processing of large output batches.
  • It can demonstrate human correlation through agreement studies with human annotators.
  • It can exhibit self-preference bias when evaluating outputs from similar LLM architectures.
  • It can require careful prompt engineering to achieve consistent evaluation behavior.
  • It can range from being a Single-Criterion LLM-as-Judge NLG Performance Measure to being a Multi-Criterion LLM-as-Judge NLG Performance Measure, depending on its evaluation scope.
  • It can range from being a Zero-Shot LLM-as-Judge NLG Performance Measure to being a Few-Shot LLM-as-Judge NLG Performance Measure, depending on its example provision.
  • It can integrate with NLG benchmark suites for standardized LLM-based evaluation.
  • ...
• Example(s):
  • LLM-as-Judge Implementations, such as:
    • GPT-4-based NLG Judge, using GPT-4 for NLG quality assessment.
    • Claude-based NLG Judge, employing Claude for NLG output evaluation.
    • PaLM-based NLG Judge, utilizing PaLM for NLG performance scoring.
    • Llama-based NLG Judge, applying Llama models for open-source NLG evaluation.
  • LLM-as-Judge Evaluation Modes, such as:
    • Direct Scoring LLM-as-Judge, assigning numeric quality scores based on evaluation rubrics.
    • Pairwise Comparison LLM-as-Judge, selecting preferred outputs between candidate pairs.
    • Ranking-based LLM-as-Judge, ordering multiple NLG outputs by quality level.
    • Binary Classification LLM-as-Judge, determining acceptance/rejection decisions.
  • LLM-as-Judge Application Domains, such as:
    • Chatbot Response Evaluation, assessing conversational appropriateness and response quality.
    • Code Generation Evaluation, judging code correctness and implementation quality.
    • Creative Writing Evaluation, evaluating narrative coherence and stylistic quality.
    • Instruction Following Evaluation, measuring task completion and constraint adherence.
    • Summarization Quality Evaluation, assessing content coverage and factual accuracy.
  • Specialized LLM-as-Judge Frameworks, such as:
    • Alpaca Eval, using LLM judges for instruction-following evaluation.
    • MT-Bench, employing multi-turn LLM evaluation for dialogue quality.
    • Constitutional AI Evaluation, applying LLM-based harmlessness assessment.
    • HELM Framework, implementing holistic LLM-based evaluation.
  • LLM-as-Judge Evaluation Criteria, such as:
    • Helpfulness Assessment, evaluating response utility and user value.
    • Harmlessness Assessment, checking for safety violations and bias.
    • Honesty Assessment, verifying factual accuracy and uncertainty expression.
    • Coherence Assessment, measuring logical flow and consistency.
  • ...
• Counter-Example(s):
  • Human-Based NLG Performance Measure, which relies on human annotators rather than LLM judges.
  • Rule-Based NLG Performance Measure, which uses deterministic rules rather than LLM assessments.
  • Statistical NLG Performance Measure, like BLEU Score, which computes statistical metrics rather than LLM judgments.
  • Embedding-Based NLG Performance Measure, like BERTScore Evaluation Metric, which uses vector similarity rather than LLM evaluation.
  • Perplexity-Based NLG Performance Measure, which measures model uncertainty rather than output quality.
• See: Natural Language Generation (NLG) Performance Measure, LLM-as-Judge, Large Language Model, Model-Based Evaluation, Automatic NLG Performance Measure, Reference-Free NLG Performance Measure, GPT-4, Evaluation Prompt Engineering, NLG Quality Assessment, AI Safety Evaluation.

---