LLM-as-Judge Software Pattern

A LLM-as-Judge Software Pattern is a software design pattern that employs a large language model as an evaluator system to assess, rank, or select from multiple candidate outputs rather than generating original responses.

• AKA: LLM Judge Pattern, LLM Evaluator Pattern, LLM-as-Judge Design Pattern, LLM Arbitration Pattern, Judge Model Pattern.
• Context:
  • It can typically evaluate LLM-as-Judge Candidate Outputs through llm-as-judge evaluation criteria and llm-as-judge scoring rubrics.
  • It can typically orchestrate LLM-as-Judge Multi-Agent Systems with llm-as-judge coordination mechanisms and llm-as-judge consensus protocols.
  • It can typically implement LLM-as-Judge Ensemble Decisions through llm-as-judge ranking algorithms and llm-as-judge aggregation methods.
  • It can typically structure LLM-as-Judge Evaluation Protocols via llm-as-judge prompt templates and llm-as-judge assessment frameworks.
  • It can often provide LLM-as-Judge Quality Assurance through llm-as-judge output validation and llm-as-judge reliability checking.
  • It can often integrate LLM-as-Judge Feedback Loops for llm-as-judge iterative improvement and llm-as-judge performance optimization.
  • It can often support LLM-as-Judge Bias Detection through llm-as-judge fairness monitoring and llm-as-judge position bias mitigation.
  • It can often enable LLM-as-Judge Explanation Generation via llm-as-judge reasoning transparency and llm-as-judge decision justification.
  • It can range from being a Simple LLM-as-Judge Software Pattern to being a Complex LLM-as-Judge Software Pattern, depending on its llm-as-judge evaluation complexity.
  • It can range from being a Binary LLM-as-Judge Software Pattern to being a Multi-Criteria LLM-as-Judge Software Pattern, depending on its llm-as-judge decision granularity.
  • It can range from being a Centralized LLM-as-Judge Software Pattern to being a Distributed LLM-as-Judge Software Pattern, depending on its llm-as-judge architecture distribution.
  • It can range from being a Synchronous LLM-as-Judge Software Pattern to being an Asynchronous LLM-as-Judge Software Pattern, depending on its llm-as-judge processing mode.
  • It can range from being a Domain-Specific LLM-as-Judge Software Pattern to being a General-Purpose LLM-as-Judge Software Pattern, depending on its llm-as-judge application scope.
  • It can integrate with LLM-as-Judge Evaluation Pipeline for llm-as-judge systematic processing.
  • It can utilize LLM-as-Judge Calibration Method for llm-as-judge confidence alignment.
  • ...
• Examples:
  • LLM-as-Judge Implementation Types, such as:
    • Pairwise LLM-as-Judge Pattern for pairwise output comparison.
    • Ranking LLM-as-Judge Pattern for multi-candidate ranking.
    • Scoring LLM-as-Judge Pattern for absolute quality scoring.
  • LLM-as-Judge Application Domains, such as:
    • Legal LLM-as-Judge Pattern for legal document evaluation.
    • Medical LLM-as-Judge Pattern for medical decision assessment.
    • Code LLM-as-Judge Pattern for code quality evaluation.
  • LLM-as-Judge Evaluation Methods, such as:
    • Chain-of-Thought Judge Pattern for reasoning-based evaluation.
    • Multi-Judge Consensus Pattern for ensemble-based assessment.
    • Iterative Refinement Judge Pattern for progressive evaluation.
  • ...
• Counter-Examples:
  • LLM Generation Pattern, which focuses on content creation rather than llm-as-judge evaluation.
  • Rule-Based Decision System, which uses deterministic logic rather than llm-as-judge natural language reasoning.
  • Human Evaluation System, which relies on human judgment rather than llm-as-judge automated assessment.
  • Statistical Scoring System, which uses numerical computation rather than llm-as-judge language-based evaluation.
• See: Software Design Pattern, LLM-as-Judge Evaluation Method, Pairwise LLM Comparison Method, Large Language Model, Multi-Agent System, Evaluation Framework, AI Integration Software System Design Pattern, Ensemble Decision System, Quality Assurance System, LLM-as-Judge Calibration Method, LLM-as-Judge Evaluation Pipeline.

---