LLM as Judge Multi-Agent System

A LLM as Judge Multi-Agent System is a multi-agent system that coordinates multiple autonomous agents through centralized evaluation by a large language model acting as an arbitrator.

• AKA: LLM Judge Multi-Agent Architecture, LLM Arbitrated Multi-Agent System, LLM Coordinated Agent System.
• Context:
  • It can typically coordinate LLM as Judge Agent Interactions through llm as judge multi-agent coordination protocols.
  • It can typically resolve LLM as Judge Agent Conflicts via llm as judge conflict resolution mechanisms.
  • It can typically aggregate LLM as Judge Agent Outputs through llm as judge consensus algorithms.
  • It can typically manage LLM as Judge Agent Roles with llm as judge role assignment strategies.
  • It can often implement LLM as Judge Agent Hierarchys for llm as judge distributed decision making.
  • It can often provide LLM as Judge Agent Performance Monitoring through llm as judge agent evaluation metrics.
  • It can often support LLM as Judge Agent Communication via llm as judge inter-agent messaging.
  • It can range from being a Centralized LLM as Judge Multi-Agent System to being a Distributed LLM as Judge Multi-Agent System, depending on its llm as judge coordination architecture.
  • It can range from being a Homogeneous LLM as Judge Multi-Agent System to being a Heterogeneous LLM as Judge Multi-Agent System, depending on its llm as judge agent diversity.
  • It can range from being a Synchronous LLM as Judge Multi-Agent System to being an Asynchronous LLM as Judge Multi-Agent System, depending on its llm as judge coordination timing.
  • It can range from being a Small-Scale LLM as Judge Multi-Agent System to being a Large-Scale LLM as Judge Multi-Agent System, depending on its llm as judge system size.
  • ...
• Examples:
  • LLM as Judge Multi-Agent System Types, such as:
    • LLM as Judge Collaborative Research System for llm as judge multi-agent knowledge synthesis.
    • LLM as Judge Competitive Agent System for llm as judge tournament-style evaluation.
    • LLM as Judge Hierarchical Agent System for llm as judge multi-level decision making.
  • LLM as Judge Multi-Agent System Applications, such as:
    • LLM as Judge Multi-Agent Legal Analysis System for llm as judge collaborative legal reasoning.
    • LLM as Judge Multi-Agent Content Creation System for llm as judge collaborative content generation.
    • LLM as Judge Multi-Agent Problem Solving System for llm as judge distributed problem decomposition.
  • LLM as Judge Multi-Agent System Components, such as:
    • LLM as Judge Agent Coordinator for llm as judge central arbitration.
    • LLM as Judge Communication Protocol for llm as judge agent messaging.
    • LLM as Judge Consensus Algorithm for llm as judge group decision making.
  • ...
• Counter-Examples:
  • Traditional Multi-Agent System, which lacks llm as judge centralized evaluation.
  • LLM-based Agentic Reasoning Design Pattern, which focuses on individual agent autonomy rather than llm as judge coordinated evaluation.
  • Distributed Computing System, which uses algorithmic coordination rather than llm as judge natural language arbitration.
  • Human-Mediated Multi-Agent System, which relies on human coordination rather than llm as judge automated arbitration.
• See: LLM as Judge Software Pattern, Multi-Agent System, Large Language Model, Agent Coordination Protocol, Distributed AI System, Consensus Algorithm, Conflict Resolution System, Performance Monitoring System, Communication Protocol.

---