# Modus Tollens

A Modus Tollens is a Rule of Inference under which the Antecedent of a Conditional is rejected if and only if the Consequent of the Conditional is rejected.

**AKA:**Denying the Consequent**Context:***- It can be expressed as
*If P, then Q. ¬Q. Therefore, ¬P*.

- It can be expressed as
**Example(s):**- "
*If an intruder is detected, the alarm goes off. The alarm does not go off. Therefore, no intruder is detected.*

- "
**Counter-Example(s):***All men are mortal. Socrates is a man. Therefore, Socrates is mortal.*(Affirming the Antecedent)*All men are mortal. Socrates is mortal. Therefore, Socrates is a man.*(Affirming the Consequent).

**See:**Modus Ponens, Valid Deductive Argument, Deductive Logic Framework.

## References

- (Wikipedia, 2009) ⇒ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modus_tollens
- In logic, modus tollendo tollens (Latin for "the way that denies by denying") is the formal name for indirect proof or proof by contraposition ...
- In classical logic, modus tollens (or modus tollendo tollens)[1] (Latin for "the way that denies by denying")[2] has the following argument form:
*If P, then Q. ¬Q. Therefore, ¬P*. - It can also be referred to as denying the consequent, and is a valid form of argument (unlike similarly-named but invalid arguments such as affirming the consequent or denying the antecedent). (See also modus ponens or "affirming the antecedent".)
- Modus tollens is sometimes confused with indirect proof (assuming the negation of the proposition to be proved and showing that this leads to a contradiction) or proof by contrapositive (proving If P, then Q by a proof of the equivalent contrapositive If not-Q, then not-P).
- Consider an example:
*If an intruder is detected, the alarm goes off. The alarm does not go off. Therefore, no intruder is detected.* - Every use of modus tollens can be converted to a use of modus ponens and one use of transposition to the premise which is a material implication.

- http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/modus_tollens
- An valid form of argument in which the consequent of a conditional proposition is denied, thus implying the denial of the antecedent. ...

- CYC Glossary http://www.cyc.com/cycdoc/ref/glossary.html
- modus tollens: A rule of inference which can be derived from modus ponens under which, given a knowledge base which contains the formulas "Not B" and "A implies B", one may conclude "Not A".

- http://www.logic-classroom.info/glossary.htm
- modus tollens means "a way of destroying;" symbolically: "If p, then q; not-q; therefore,not-p. (Study 4)

- http://www.philosophy.uncc.edu/mleldrid/logic/logiglos.html
- Modus Tollens: Consists of a conditional statement and one other premise. The second premise denies the consequent of the conditional, yielding the denied antecedent as the conclusion: IF (IF p THEN q) AND (not-q) THEN (not-p).

*
*