LLM Text Authenticity Measure

A LLM Text Authenticity Measure is a quality measure that quantifies human-likeness of text content.

• AKA: AI Score, Human-Like Score, Naturalness Score, Authenticity Check, Real vs AI Score.
• Context:
  • It can typically evaluate Multiple Linguistic Dimensions including lexical choice, syntactic structure, and discourse coherence.
  • It can typically compare Text Features against human writing baselines.
  • It can often incorporate LLM Writing Marker detection in authenticity scoring.
  • It can often utilize Statistical Distribution Analysis for naturalness assessment.
  • It can often support Content Verification Systems in authenticity determination.
  • It can range from being a Binary LLM Text Authenticity Measure to being a Continuous LLM Text Authenticity Measure, depending on its score granularity.
  • It can range from being a Single-Feature LLM Text Authenticity Measure to being a Multi-Feature LLM Text Authenticity Measure, depending on its feature scope.
  • It can range from being a Model-Agnostic LLM Text Authenticity Measure to being a Model-Specific LLM Text Authenticity Measure, depending on its detection target.
  • It can range from being a Language-Specific LLM Text Authenticity Measure to being a Multilingual LLM Text Authenticity Measure, depending on its language coverage.
  • It can range from being a Real-Time LLM Text Authenticity Measure to being a Batch LLM Text Authenticity Measure, depending on its processing mode.
  • ...
• Examples:
  • Statistical LLM Text Authenticity Measures, such as:
    • Perplexity-Based Authenticity Score using language model surprise.
    • N-gram Distribution Score measuring lexical pattern naturalness.
    • Syntactic Complexity Score evaluating sentence structure variety.
  • Neural LLM Text Authenticity Measures, such as:
    • BERT-Based Authenticity Score using contextual embeddings.
    • GPT Detector Score from specialized classifiers.
  • Hybrid LLM Text Authenticity Measures, such as:
    • Ensemble Authenticity Score combining multiple metrics.
    • Weighted Feature Score integrating diverse indicators.
  • ...
• Counter-Examples:
  • Text Readability Measure, which evaluates comprehension difficulty rather than authenticity.
  • Grammar Correctness Score, which measures language accuracy rather than human-likeness.
  • Sentiment Analysis Score, which quantifies emotional content rather than generation source.
  • Plagiarism Score, which detects content copying rather than ai generation.
• See: Text Generation Originality Measure, LLM Writing Marker, AI-Generated Text Detection Task, Text Quality Measure, Natural Language Generation Evaluation, Stylometric Analysis, Human Evaluation Metric, Content Authenticity Verification, Text Analysis Metric.

---