Statistical Misconception

A Statistical Misconception is a domain-specific systematic cognitive misconception that involves incorrect understanding or application of statistical concepts, statistical methods, or statistical inferences.

• AKA: Statistical Fallacy, Statistical Misunderstanding, Statistical Interpretation Error, Statistical Reasoning Error.
• Context:
  • It can typically manifest in Research Publications through incorrect statistical claims.
  • It can typically affect Data-Driven Decision Making through flawed statistical reasoning.
  • It can typically propagate through Statistical Education Systems lacking conceptual emphasis.
  • It can often arise from Intuitive Reasoning Conflict with statistical principles.
  • It can often persist despite Statistical Training due to cognitive bias reinforcement.
  • It can often lead to Invalid Research Conclusions despite correct computational procedures.
  • ...
  • It can range from being a Computational Statistical Misconception to being a Conceptual Statistical Misconception, depending on its error type focus.
  • It can range from being a Elementary Statistical Misconception to being an Advanced Statistical Misconception, depending on its statistical concept complexity.
  • It can range from being a Descriptive Statistical Misconception to being an Inferential Statistical Misconception, depending on its statistical domain.
  • It can range from being a Frequentist Statistical Misconception to being a Bayesian Statistical Misconception, depending on its statistical framework.
  • ...
  • It can undermine Evidence-Based Practice across scientific disciplines.
  • It can contribute to Reproducibility Crisis in empirical research.
  • It can influence Public Policy Formation through misinterpreted statistical evidence.
  • It can affect Medical Decision Making through incorrect risk assessment.
  • ...
• Example(s):
  • Probability Misconceptions, such as:
    • Gambler's Fallacy misunderstanding independence in random events.
    • Base Rate Fallacy ignoring prior probability in conditional reasoning.
    • Conjunction Fallacy violating probability laws in likelihood judgment.
  • Sampling Misconceptions, such as:
    • Sample Size Insensitivity ignoring impact of sample size on estimate precision.
    • Survivorship Bias overlooking selection effects in observed samples.
    • Regression to Mean Misconception misinterpreting statistical regression phenomenon.
  • Hypothesis Testing Misconceptions, such as:
    • Common P-Value Misconception equating p-value with error probability.
    • Statistical Significance Worship overemphasizing significance thresholds.
    • Multiple Testing Ignorance ignoring family-wise error rate.
  • Correlation Misconceptions, such as:
    • Correlation-Causation Conflation inferring causal relationship from correlation.
    • Ecological Fallacy applying group-level patterns to individual cases.
    • Simpson's Paradox Confusion misunderstanding aggregation effects.
  • ...
• Counter-Example(s):
  • Statistical Literacy, which represents correct understanding of statistical concepts.
  • Computational Error, which involves calculation mistakes rather than conceptual misunderstanding.
  • Data Entry Error, which represents transcription mistakes rather than interpretation errors.
  • Modeling Assumption Violation, which involves technical requirements rather than conceptual confusion.
• See: Misconception, Cognitive Bias, Statistical Reasoning, Statistical Education, Research Methodology, Statistical Literacy, Evidence-Based Practice.

---