2004 OntologyAndTheLexicon: Difference between revisions

From GM-RKB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (potentially incorrect bot edit, will re-run for this page)
Tags: Manual revert Reverted
m (return the incorrectly reverted edit of the bot)
Tag: Manual revert
Line 1: Line 1:
* ([[2004_OntologyAndTheLexicon|Hirst, 2004]]) ⇒ [[author::Graeme Hirst]]. ([[year::2004]]). “[http://www.cs.toronto.edu/pub/gh/Hirst-Ontol-2009.pdf Ontology and the Lexicon].” In: [[Steffen Staab]], and [[Rudi Studer]] (Eds.). “Handbook on Ontologies." Springer. ISBN:3540408347
* ([[2004_OntologyAndTheLexicon|Hirst, 2004]]) => [[author::Graeme Hirst]]. ([[year::2004]]). "''[http://www.cs.toronto.edu/pub/gh/Hirst-Ontol-2009.pdf Ontology and the Lexicon.]''" In: [[journal::Steffen Staab]], and [[Rudi Studer]] (Eds.) "''Handbook on Ontologies.''" Springer. ISBN: 3540408347


<B>Subject Headings:</B> [[Ontology]], [[Lexicon]], [[Linguistically Grounded Ontology]].
'''Subject Headings:''' [[Ontology]], [[Lexicon]], [[Linguistically Grounded Ontology]].


== Notes ==
== Notes ==
* Related to ([[2010_OntologyAndTheLexicon|Huang et al., 2010]]).
* Related to ([[2010_OntologyAndTheLexicon|Huang & al, 2010]]).


== Quotes ==
== Quotes ==


=== Summary ===
=== Summary ===
A [[Lexicon|lexicon]] is a [[Linguistic Object|linguistic object]] and hence is not the same thing as an [[Ontology|ontology]], which is [[non-linguistic]]. Nonetheless, [[Word Sense|word senses]] are in many ways similar to [[Ontology Concept|ontological concepts]] and [[Word Sense Relationship|the relationships found between word senses]] resemble [[Ontology Relationship|the relationships found between concepts]]. Although the arbitrary and semi-arbitrary distinctions made by [[Natural Language|natural languages]] limit the degree to which these similarities can be exploited, a [[Lexicon|lexicon]] can nonetheless serve in the development of an [[Ontology|ontology]], especially in a [[Technical Domain|technical domain]].
* A [[Lexicon|lexicon]] is a [[Linguistic Object|linguistic object]] and hence is not the same thing as an [[Ontology|ontology]], which is [[non-linguistic]]. Nonetheless, [[Word Sense|word senses]] are in many ways similar to [[Ontology Concept|ontological concepts]] and [[Word Sense Relationship|the relationships found between word senses]] resemble [[Ontology Relationship|the relationships found between concepts]]. Although the arbitrary and semi-arbitrary distinctions made by [[Natural Language|natural languages]] limit the degree to which these similarities can be exploited, a [[Lexicon|lexicon]] can nonetheless serve in the development of an [[Ontology|ontology]], especially in a [[Technical Domain|technical domain]].
 
…
 
=== 2 Lexical entries ===
 
==== 2.1 What’s in a lexical entry? ====
 
Any detail of the linguistic behaviour or use of a word may be included in its [[lexical entry]]: its phonetics (including pronunciations, syllabification, and stress pattern), written forms (including hyphenation points), morphology (including inflections and other affixation), syntactic and combinatory behaviour, constraints on its use, its relative frequency, and, of course, all aspects of its meaning. For our purposes in this chapter, the word’s semantic properties, including relationships between the meanings of the word and those of other words, are the most important, and we will look at them in detail in section 3.2 below.
 
Thus, as mentioned earlier, a [[lexical entry]] is potentially quite a [[large record]]. For example, the [[CELEX lexicon]]s of English, Dutch, and German ([[Baayen, Piepenbrock, and van Rijn 1993]]) are [[represented as]] databases whose records have 950 fields. Andin an explanatory combinatorial dictionary (ECD) (e.g.,Melcuk 1984, Melcuk and Zholkovsky 1988), which attempts to explicate literally every aspect of the knowledge that a speaker needs to have in order to use a word correctly, lexical entries can run to many pages. For example, Steele’s ([[1990]]) ECD-style entry for eight senses of <i>hope</i> (noun and verb) is 28 [[book-sized page]]s long, much of which is devoted to the combinatory properties of the word — for example, the noun <i>hope</i> permits <i>flicker</i> of to denote a small amount (whereas <i>expectation</i>, in contrast, does not).
 
Many linguistic applications will require only a subset of the information that may be found in the lexical entries of large, broad-coverage lexicons. Because of their emphasis on detailed knowledge about the linguistic behaviour of words, these large, complex lexicons are sometimes referred to as lexical knowledge bases , or LKBs . Some [[researcher]]s distinguish LKBs from lexicons by regarding LKBs as the larger and more-abstract source from which instances of lexicons for particular applications may be generated. In the present chapter, [[we]] will not need to make this distinction, and will just use the term <B>[[lexicon]]</B>.
 
----


__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
[[Category:Publication]], [[Category:Publication 2004]]
[[Category:Publication 2004]]


<br />{{#ask: [[{{FULLPAGENAME}}]]
{{#ask: [[{{FULLPAGENAME}}]]
| ?author
| ?author
| ?volume
| ?volume
Line 40: Line 26:
| ?year
| ?year
| format=bibtex
| format=bibtex
}}{{Publication|doi=|title=Ontology and the Lexicon|titleUrl=http://www.cs.toronto.edu/pub/gh/Hirst-Ontol-2009.pdf}}
}}{{Publication|doi=|title=Ontology and the Lexicon.|titleUrl=http://www.cs.toronto.edu/pub/gh/Hirst-Ontol-2009.pdf}}
[[Category:Publication]]

Revision as of 23:31, 3 August 2023

Subject Headings: Ontology, Lexicon, Linguistically Grounded Ontology.

Notes

Quotes

Summary

 AuthorvolumeDate ValuetitletypejournaltitleUrldoinoteyear
2004 OntologyAndTheLexiconGraeme HirstOntology and the Lexicon.Steffen Staabhttp://www.cs.toronto.edu/pub/gh/Hirst-Ontol-2009.pdf2004
Retrieved from "http://www.gabormelli.com/RKB/index.php?title=2004_OntologyAndTheLexicon&oldid=817569"