Linguistic Dialogue
(Redirected from Dialog)
A Linguistic Dialogue is an conversational exchange that ...
- AKA: Dialog.
- Context:
- It can range from being a Goal-Oriented Dialog to being a Chit-Chat Dialog.
- It can be associated with a Linguistic Dialoguing Task.
- Example(s):
- Counter-Example(s):
- See: Egalitarian Dialogue, Negotiation, Conversation, Didactic.
References
2015
- (Wikipedia, 2015) ⇒ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/dialogue Retrieved:2015-8-29.
- Dialogue (sometimes spelled dialog in American English [1] ) is a written or spoken conversational exchange between two or more people, and a literary and theatrical form that depicts such an exchange. As a narrative, philosophical or didactic device, it is chiefly associated in the West with the Socratic dialogue as developed by Plato, but antecedents are also found in other traditions including Indian literature. In the 20th century, philosophical treatments of dialogue emerged from thinkers including Mikhail Bakhtin, Paulo Freire, Martin Buber, and David Bohm. Although diverging in many details, these thinkers have articulated a holistic concept of dialogue as a multi-dimensional, dynamic and context-dependent process of creating meaning. Educators such as Freire and Ramón Flecha have also developed a body of theory and technique for using egalitarian dialogue as a pedagogical tool.
- ↑ See entry on "dialogue (n)" in the Oxford English Dictionary, 2nd ed.
2014
- (Girlea et al., 2014) ⇒ Codruta Girlea, Eyal Amir, and Roxana Girju. (2014). “Tracking Beliefs and Intentions in the Werewolf Game.” In: Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. ISBN:1-57735-657-8, 978-1-57735-657-8
- QUOTE: Agents are engaged in dialogues according to goals they can satisfy by talking to other agents (Cohen and Perrault 1979), (Perrault and Allen 1980). A dialogue is a sequence of utterances, produced by agents based on their beliefs, in order to reach intended states of facts by causing other agents to change their beliefs and thus also their intentions. Our goal is to model this interaction between beliefs, intentions, and utterances. The ability to predict decisions resulting from the dialogue is used as a performance measure.
1986
- (Grosz & Sidner, 1986) ⇒ Barbara J. Grosz, and Candace L. Sidner. (1986). “Attention, Intentions, and the Structure of Discourse.” In: Computational Linguistics Journal, 12(3).
- QUOTE: In this paper we explore a new theory of discourse structure that stresses the role of purpose and processing in discourse. In this theory, discourse structure is composed of three separate but interrelated components: the structure of the sequence of utterances (called the linguistic structure), a structure of purposes (called the intentional structure), and the state of focus of attention (called the attentional state). The linguistic structure consists of segments of the discourse into which the utterances naturally aggregate.
