Post-Mortem Document
(Redirected from Post-Mortem Documentation)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
A Post-Mortem Document is an analysis document for a concluded project.
- Context:
- It can (typically) be produced by a Post-Mortem Task.
- It can (often) include Quantitative Analysis and Qualitative Analysis about the project.
- It can summarize the Project Successes and Project Failures.
- It can contain a Root Cause Analysis of the project issues.
- It can list Lessons Learned and Recommendations for future projects.
- It can be a key component for Organizational Learning and Process Improvement.
- It can be used to inform Risk Management Strategies in future projects.
- It can be beneficial for both Successful Projects and Unsuccessful Projects as a tool for continuous improvement.
- It can differ from a Software Development Retrospective in that it is typically more comprehensive and final.
- ...
- Example(s):
- ...
- Counter-Example(s):
- Pre-Mortem Document (for a pre-mortem).
- See: Lessons Learned, Risk Management, Project Management Body of Knowledge.
References
2024
- (Wikipedia, 2024) ⇒ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postmortem_documentation Retrieved:2024-2-2.
- A project post-mortem is a process used to identify the causes of a project failure (or significant business-impairing downtime), and how to prevent them in the future. This is different from a Retrospective, in which both positive and negative things are reviewed for a project.
The Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK) refers to the process as lessons learned. [1] Project post-mortems are intended to inform process improvements which mitigate future risks and to promote iterative best practices. Post-mortems are often considered a key component of, and ongoing precursor to, effective risk management. [2]
- A project post-mortem is a process used to identify the causes of a project failure (or significant business-impairing downtime), and how to prevent them in the future. This is different from a Retrospective, in which both positive and negative things are reviewed for a project.
- ↑ Lessons Learned on the website of the Center for Disease Control, read 3. September 2015.
- ↑ IEEE: A defined process for project post mortem review
2024
- GPT-4
- For a smaller project, the structure of a post-mortem document can be simplified to focus on the most critical aspects while ensuring a comprehensive review. Here's a suggested table of contents:
1. **Executive Summary** - Brief Overview of the Project - Key Objectives and Scope - Summary of Outcomes 2. **Project Overview** - Brief Description of the Project - Timeline and Major Milestones 3. **Objectives and Results** - Stated Goals of the Project - Results Achieved - Variance from Planned Outcomes 4. **Key Learnings** - Major Successes and What Contributed to Them - Main Challenges Encountered - Overview of Failures or Shortcomings 5. **Analysis of Key Issues** - Brief Root Cause Analysis of Major Problems - Discussion of Unexpected Challenges 6. **Recommendations for Future Projects** - Key Lessons Learned - Actionable Recommendations - Suggestions for Process Improvements 7. **Conclusion** - Final Thoughts - Next Steps or Follow-Up Actions 8. **Appendices (if necessary)** - Supporting Data or Analysis - Meeting Notes or Feedback Summaries