Text Semantic Annotation Task
(Redirected from Semantic annotation of text)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
A text semantic annotation task is a text annotation task that is a semantic annotation task (to produce a semantically annotated text item).
- Context:
- Input: a Text Item.
- output: a Semantically Annotated Text Item.
- It can be solved by a Text Semantic Annotation System (that implements a Text Semantic Annotation Algorithm).
- It can range from being a Heuristic Text Semantic Annotation Task to being a Data-Driven Text Semantic Annotation Task, such as supervised semantic text annotation.
- It can range from being an Automatic Text Semantic Annotation Task to being a Manual Text Semantic Annotation Task.
- It can range from being a Concept Mention Annotation Task to being a Relation Mention Annotation Task.
- It can be supported by:
- a Mention Identification Task, for the specific location in the text.
- a Mention Classification Task, to a general category label.
- a Mention Grounding Task, to the specific item in a knowledge base.
- It can be a specialization of a Document to Ontology Interlinking Task.
- Example(s):
- a Relation Mention Annotation Task.
- a Concept Mention Annotation Task, such as:
- …
- Counter-Example(s):
- See: Annotation Tag.
References
- http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22a+semantic+annotation+task%22+algorithm+text
- http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22semantic+annotation+can%22+algorithm+task+text
2010
- (Palmer et al., 2010) ⇒ Martha Palmer, Daniel Gildea, and Nianwen Xue. (2010). “Semantic Role Labeling." Morgan & Claypool Publishers. doi:10.2200/S00239ED1V01Y200912HLT006 ISBN:1598298313
- QUOTE: Chapter 2 describes how the theories have led to structured lexicons such as FrameNet, VerbNet and the PropBank Frame Files that in turn provide the basis for large scale semantic annotation of corpora.
- (Roberts, Gaizauskas et al., 2010) ⇒ Angus Roberts, Robert Gaizauskas, Mark Hepple, George Demetriou, Yikun Guo, Ian Roberts, and Andrea Setzer. (2010). “Building a Semantically Annotated Corpus of Clinical Texts.” In: Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 42 (5). doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2008.12.013
- QUOTE: ... The resulting corpus is the most richly semantically annotated resource for clinical text processing built to date ...
2008
- (Baumgartner Jr et al., 2008) ⇒ William A. Baumgartner Jr, Zhiyong Lu, Helen L Johnson, J Gregory Caporaso, Jesse Paquette, Anna Lindemann, Elizabeth K White, Olga Medvedeva, K Bretonnel Cohen, and Lawrence Hunter. (2008). “Concept Recognition for Extracting Protein Interaction Relations from Biomedical Text.” In: Genome Biology supplement on The BioCreative II - Critical Assessment for Information Extraction in Biology Challenge.
2006
- (Navigli & Velardi, 2006) ⇒ Roberto Navigli, and Paola Velardi. (2006). “Ontology Enrichment Through Automatic Semantic Annotation of On-Line Glossaries.” In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (EKAW 2006). doi:10.1007/11891451_14
- QUOTE: The contribution of this paper is to provide a methodology for automatic ontology enrichment and for document annotation with the concepts and properties of a domain core ontology.
2005
- (Reeve & Han, 2005) ⇒ Lawrence Reeve, and Hyoil Han. (2005). “Survey of Semantic Annotation Platforms.” In: Proceedings of the 2005 ACM symposium on Applied computing [doi:10.1145/1066677.1067049].
- QUOTE: ... Semantic annotations are to tag ontology class instance data and map it into ontology classes. The fully automatic creation of semantic annotations is an unsolved problem. Instead, current systems focus on the semi-automatic creation of annotations. ...
- (Uren et al., 2005) ⇒ Victoria Uren, Philipp Cimiano, José Iria, Siegfried Handschuh, Maria Vargas-Vera, Enrico Motta, and Fabio Ciravegna. (2005). “Semantic Annotation for Knowledge Management: Requirements and a survey of the state of the art.” In: Journal of Web Semantics, 4(1). doi:10.1016/j.websem.2005.10.002
- QUOTE: ... In the emerging Semantic Web, search, interpretation and aggregation can be addressed by ontology-based semantic mark-up. In this paper, we examine semantic annotation, identify a number of requirements, and review the current generation of semantic annotation systems. This analysis shows that, while there is still some way to go before semantic annotation tools will be able to address fully all the knowledge management needs, research in the area is active and making good progress.
2004
- (Kiryakov et al., 2004) ⇒ Atanas Kiryakov, Borislav Popov, Ivan Terziev, Dimitar Manov, and Damyan Ognyanoff. (2004). “Semantic Annotation, Indexing, and Retrieval.” In: Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 2(1). doi:10.1016/j.websem.2004.07.005
- QUOTE: ... This paper introduces our vision for a holistic architecture for semantic annotation, indexing, and retrieval of documents with regard to extensive semantic repositories. ...
2003
- (Kiryakov et al., 2003) ⇒ Atanas Kiryakov, Borislav Popov, Ivan Terziev, Dimitar Manov, and Damyan Ognyanoff. (2003). “Semantic Annotation, Indexing, and Retrieval.” In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2003). doi:10.1016/j.websem.2004.07.005
- (Assfalg et al., 2003) ⇒ Jürgen Assfalg, Marco Bertini, Carlo Colombo, Alberto Del Bimbo, and Walter Nunziati. (2003). “Semantic Annotation of Soccer Videos: automatic highlights identification.” In: Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 92(2-3). doi:doi:10.1016/j.cviu.2003.06.004
- (Fleischman et al., 2003) ⇒ Michael Fleischman, Namhee Kwon, and Eduard Hovy. (2003). “Maximum Entropy Models for FrameNet Classification.” In: Proceedings of EMNLP Conference (EMNLP 2003).
- QUOTE: The development of FrameNet, a large database of semantically annotated sentences, has primed research into statistical methods for semantic tagging.
- (Dill et al., 2003a) ⇒ Stephen Dill, Nadav Eiron, David Gibson, Daniel Gruhl, R. Guha, Anant Jhingran, Tapas Kanungo, Kevin S. McCurley, Sridhar Rajagopalan, Andrew Tomkins, John A. Tomlin, and Jason Y. Zien. (2003). “A Case for Automated Large Scale Semantic Annotations.” In: Journal of Web Semantics, 1(1).
2002
- (Vargas-Vera et al., 2002) ⇒ Maria Vargas-Vera, Enrico Motta, John Domingue, Mattia Lanzoni, Arthur Stutt, and Fabio Ciravegna. (2002). “MnM: Ontology Driven Tool for Semantic Markup.” In: Proceedings of the Workshop Semantic Authoring, Annotation & Knowledge Markup (SAAKM 2002).
- QUOTE: An important precondition for realising the goal of a semantic web is the ability to annotate web resources with semantic information. In order to carry out this task, users need appropriate representation languages, ontologies, and support tools.
- (Handschuh et al., 2002) ⇒ Siegfried Handschuh, Steffen Staab, and Fabio Ciravegna. (2002). “S-CREAM - Semi-automatic CREAtion of Metadata.” In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management.
2001
- (Kahan & Koivunen, 2003) ⇒ José Kahan, and Marja-Riitta Koivunen. (2001). “An Open RDF Infrastructure for Shared Web Annotations.” In: Proceedings of the Tenth International World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2001)
1999
- (Heck et al., 1999) ⇒ Rachel M. Heck, Sarah M. Luebke, and Chad H. Obermark. (1999). “A Survey of Web Annotation Systems.” Technical Report, Grinnell College.
1997
- (Collins & Miller, 1997) ⇒ Michael Collins, and Scott Miller. (1997). “Semantic Tagging Using a Probabilistic Context Free Grammar.” In: Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Very Large Corpora.
- QUOTE: This paper describes a statistical model for extraction of events at the sentence level, or “semantic tagging", typically the first level of processing in Information Extraction systems. ...