Social Identity

From GM-RKB
(Redirected from identity (social science))
Jump to navigation Jump to search

A Social Identity is an identity based on social relations.



References

2021

  • (Wikipedia, 2021) ⇒ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Identity_(social_science) Retrieved:2021-5-7.
    • Identity is the qualities, beliefs, personality, looks and/or expressions that make a person (self-identity as emphasized in psychology ) or group (collective identity as pre-eminent in sociology).[1] One can regard the awareness and the categorizing of identity as positive or as destructive. [2] A psychological identity relates to self-image (one's mental model of oneself), self-esteem, and individuality. Consequently, Peter Weinreich gives the definition:

      "A person's identity is defined as the totality of one's self-construal, in which how one construes oneself in the present expresses the continuity between how one construes oneself as one was in the past and how one construes oneself as one aspires to be in the future"; this allows for definitions of aspects of identity, such as: "One's ethnic identity is defined as that part of the totality of one's self-construal made up of those dimensions that express the continuity between one's construal of past ancestry and one's future aspirations in relation to ethnicity".

       Gender identity forms an important part of identity in psychology, as it can dictate to a significantdegree how one views oneself both as a person and in relation to other people, ideas and nature. Other aspects of identity, such as racial, religious, ethnic, occupational… etc. may also be more or less significant – or significant in some situations but not in others. [3] In cognitive psychology, the term "identity" refers to the capacity for self-reflection and the awareness of self. Sociology places some explanatory weight on the concept of role-behavior. Identity negotiation may arise from the learning of social roles through personal experience. Identity negotiation is a process in which a person negotiates with society at large regarding the meaning of their identity. Psychologists most commonly use the term "identity" to describe personal identity, or the idiosyncratic things that make a person unique. Sociologists, however, often use the term to describe social identity, or the collection of group memberships that define the individual. However, these uses are not proprietary, and each discipline may use either concept and each discipline may combine both concepts when considering a person's identity. Social psychologists may speak of "psycho-social identity". [4]

       Neuroscientists draw upon these fields to study the neurobiological basis of personal and social identity. The description or representation of individual and group identity is a central task for psychologists, sociologists, anthropologists and those of other disciplines which see a requirement to map and define "identity".How should one describe the identity of another, in ways which encompass both their idiosyncratic qualities and their group memberships or identifications, both of which can shift according to circumstance? Following on from the work of Kelly, Erikson (1902–1994), Tajfel (1919–1982) and others, Weinreich's Identity Structure Analysis (ISA), is "a structural representation of the individual's existential experience, in which the relationships between self and other agents are organised in relatively stable structures over time … with the emphasis on the socio-cultural milieu in which self relates to other agents and institutions". [5] Using constructs drawn from the salient discourses of the individual, the group and cultural norms, the practical operationalisation of ISA provides a methodology that maps how these are used by the individual, applied across time and milieus by the "situated self" to appraise self and other agents and institutions (for example, resulting in the individual's evaluation of self and significant others and institutions).Individuals' identities are situated, but also contextual, situationally adaptive and changing. Despite their fluid character, identities often feel as if they are stable ubiquitous categories defining an individual, because of their grounding in the sense of personal identity (the sense of being a continuous and persistent self).


  1. Compare Collins Dictionary of Sociology, quoted in
  2. A Buddhist viewpoint warns against some views of self-identity:
  3. Weinreich & Saunderson 2003 pp 26–34.
  4. For example:
  5. Weinreich and Saunderson, (eds) 2003, p1.