1987 MarkupSystemsAndTheFutOfScholTxtProc

From GM-RKB
Jump to: navigation, search

Subject Headings: Research Paper.

Notes

Cited By

Quotes

Abstract

Markup practices can affect the move toward systems that support scholars in the process of thinking and writing. Whereas procedural and presentational markup systems retard that movement, descriptive markup systems accelerate the pace by simplifying mechanical tasks and allowing the authors to focus their attention on the content.

References

1. Alexander. G.B. Computer aids for authors and editors: A natural extension of word processing and typesetting? Seybold Rep. Publ. Syst. 13, 10 {Feb. 13. 1984), 3-21.

2. American National Standards Institute. Infornuzfio~~ Processi,lg-Text and Office Systems-Standard Generalized Markup Language (SGML). IS0 8879-1986 (E), ANSI, New York. 1986. (First edition: Oct. 15. 1986.)

3. Association for Computing Machinery. Proceedings ?f thy ACM SIGPLAN-SIGOA Symposium on Text Manipulatim. ACM. New York, 1981.

4. Association of American Publishers. Electronic Maruscript Project: Task I Report. Aspen Systems, Rockville. Md.. 1984.

5. Association of American Publishers. Standard for EIwtrmtic Manuscript Preparafion and Markup. Electronic Manuscript Series. Association of American Publishers. Washington, D.C.. Feb. 1986.

6. Association of American Publishers. Author's Guide fo Electronic Manuscript Preparation and Markup. Electronic Manuscript Series. Association of American Publishers. Washington. D.C.. May 1986.

7. BDS. (TAG) The SGML Newsletter. BDS. Sterling, Va.. 8. Richard Beach, Maureen Stone, Graphical style towards high quality illustrations, Proceedings of the 10th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, p.127-135, July 25-29, 1983, Detroit, Michigan, United States

9. Bush. V. As we may think. Afl. Mon. 776. 1 (July 1945). 101-108.

10. Carmody, S., Cross. W.. Nelson, T.H., Rice, D., and van Dam, A. A hypertext editing system for the /360. In Perfinmt Concepts in Computer Graphics. M. Faiman and J. Nievergelt. Eds. University of Illinois Press, Urbana. I

ll., 1969, pp. 291-330.. 11. Donald D. Chamberlin, James C. King, Donald R. Slutz, Stephen J.P. Todd, Bradford W. Wade, JANUS: An interactive system for document composition, Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN SIGOA symposium on Text manipulation, p.82-91, June 08-10, 1981, Portland, Oregon, United States

12. Coombs. J.H. Information management system for scholars. Tech. Memo. TM 69-2, Computer Center. Brown Univ., Providence. R.I.. Dec. 1986.

13. James H. Coombs, Scott, A.M., Landow. G.P.. and Sanders, A.A., Eds. A Pm-Raphaelite Friendship: The Correspondence of William Holman Hunt and John Lucas Tupper. UMI Research Press, Ann Arbor. Mich., 1986.

14. Corda. U.. and Facchetti. G. Concept browser: A system for interactive creation of dynamic documentation. In Texf Processing and Document Manipulation, J.C. van Vliet. Ed. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. Mass., 1986, pp. 233-245.

15. Drucker. P.F. Management; Tasks, Responsibilities, Practices. Harper and Row. New York. 1973.

16. Engelhart, D.C.. and English, W.K. A research center for augmenting human intellect. In: Proceedings of the AFIPS Fall joint Computer Can- /erence (San Francisco, Calif.. Dec. 9-11). AFIPS Press, Reston. Va., 1968. pp. 395-410.

17. Engelhart. D.C.. Watson, R.W.. and Norton, J.C. The augmented knowledge workship. In: Proceedings of the National Computer Conference (New York, June 4-8). AFIPS Press, Reston, Va., 1973. pp. 9-2 1..

18. C. F. Goldfarb, A generalized approach to document markup, Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN SIGOA symposium on Text manipulation, p.68-73, June 08-10, 1981, Portland, Oregon, United States

19. Integration and pagination: Long documents. proposals, books. Seybold Rep. Publ. Syst. 16. 16 (Apr. 27, 1987). 21-27.

20. Interfaces. media converters and OCR devices. Seybold Rep. Publ. sysr. 75. 18 (June 2. 1986). 34-39.

21. Lamport. L. LATEX User's Guide and Reference Manual. Addison- Wesley. Reading, Mass., 1986..

22. S. A Mamrak, M. J Kaelbling, C. K. Nicholas, M. Share, A software architecture for supporting the exchange of electronic manuscripts, Communications of the ACM, v.30 n.5, p.408-414, May 1987 doi:10.1145/22899.22905.

23. Norman Meyrowitz, Andries van Dam, Interactive Editing Systems: Part I, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), v.14 n.3, p.321-352, Sept. 1982 doi:10.1145/356887.356889

24. Modern Language Association. MLA Handbook. MLA. New York. 1977.

25. Modern Language Association. ML.4 Handbook. MLA. New York. 1984.

26. Nelson. T.H. Getting it out of our system. In I~@malio~~ Rcfrieval: A Critic-al Rruiew. G. Schecter, Ed. Thompson, Washington, D.C.. 1967. pp. 191-210.

27. Nelson. T.H. Cnrrrpul. Libr. (1974).

28. Nelson. T.H. Llferaq Machirm. Nelson. Nashville. Term.. 1981.

29. Nievergelt. 1.. Coray. G.. Nicoud. I.D.. and Shaw. A.C.. Eds. Documetlf Prcparafrw Sys~rnrs. North-Holland. Amsterdam. 1982..

30. Brian K. Reid, A high-level approach to computer document formatting, Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT symposium on Principles of programming languages, p.24-31, January 28-30, 1980, Las Vegas, Nevada doi:10.1145/567446.567449.

31. Randall H. Trigg, Mark Weiser, TEXTNET: a network-based approach to text handling, ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), v.4 n.1, p.1-23, Jan. 1986 doi:10.1145/5401.5402.

32. Andries van Dam, David E. Rice, On-line Text Editing: A Survey, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), v.3 n.3, p.93-114, Sept. 1971 doi:10.1145/356589.356591

33. Nicole Yankelovich, Norman Meyrowitz, Andries van Dam, Reading and writing the electronic book, Computer, v.18 n.10, p.15-30, Oct. 1985 doi:10.1109/MC.1985.1662710,


 AuthorvolumeDate ValuetitletypejournaltitleUrldoinoteyear
1987 MarkupSystemsAndTheFutOfScholTxtProcJames H. Coombs
Allen H. Renear
Steven J. DeRose
Markup Systems and the Future of Scholarly Text ProcessingCommunications of the ACMhttp://cpe.njit.edu/dlnotes/CIS/CIS732 447/Cis732 6R.pdf10.1145/32206.322091987