1993 StructuralAmbiguityAndLexicalRelations

From GM-RKB
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Subject Headings: Prepositional Phrase Attachment Task

Notes

Cited By

Quotes

Abstract

We propose that many ambiguous prepositional phrase attachments can be resolved on the basis of the relative strength of association of the preposition with verbal and nominal heads, estimated on the basis of distribution in an automatically parsed corpus. This suggests that a distributional approach can provide an approximate solution to parsing problems that, in the worst case, call for complex reasoning.

References

  • Altmann, Gerry, and Steedman, Mark (1988). “Interaction with context during human sentence processing." Cognition, 30(3), 191-238.
  • Kenneth W. Church (1988). “A stochastic parts program and noun phrase parser for unrestricted text.” In: Proceedings, Second Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing. Austin, Texas, 136-143.
  • Kenneth W. Church; Gale, William; Hanks, Patrick; and Hindle, Donald (1991). “Using statistics in lexical analysis.” In: Lexical Acquisition: Exploiting On-Line Resources to Build a Lexicon, edited by Uri Zernik, 115-164.
  • Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Ford, Marilyn; Bresnan, Joan; and Kaplan, Ronald M. (1982). “A competence-based theory of syntactic closure.” In: The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, edited by Joan Bresnan, 727-796. MIT Press.
  • Frazier, Lyn (1978). “On comprehending sentences: Syntactic parsing strategies." Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut.
  • Gale, William A.; Kenneth W. Church, and David Yarowsky (In press). “A method for disambiguating word senses in a large corpus." Computers and Humanities.
  • Hindle, Donald (1983). “User manual for fidditch, a deterministic parser." Naval Research Laboratory Technical Memorandum 7590-142, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C. Hindle, Donald (in press). “A parser for text corpora.” In: Computational Approaches to the Lexicon, edited by B. T. S. Atkins and A. Zampolli. Oxford University Press.
  • Jenson, Karen, and Binot, Jean-Louis (1987). “Disambiguating prepositional phrase attachments by using on-line dictionary definitions." Computational Linguistics, 13(3--4), 251-260.
  • Kimball, J. (1973). “Seven principles of surface structure parsing in natural language." Cognition, 2, 15-47.
  • Marcus, Mitchell P. (1980). A Theory of Syntactic Recognition for Natural Language. MIT Press.
  • Mosteller, Frederick, and Wallace, David L. (1964). Inference and Disputed Authorship: The Federalist. Addison-Wesley.
  • Sinclair, J.; Hanks, P.; Fox, G.; Moon, R.; Stock, P. et al. (1987). Collins COBUILD English Language Dictionary. Collins.
  • Taraban, Roman, and McClelland, James L. (1988). “Constituent attachment and thematic role assignment in sentence processing: Influences of content-based expectations.” In: Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 597-632.
  • Whittemore, Greg; Ferrara, Kathleen; and Brunner, Hans (1990). “Empirical study of predictive powers of simple attachment schemes for post-modifier prepositional phrases." Proceedings, 28th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 23-30.

,

 AuthorvolumeDate ValuetitletypejournaltitleUrldoinoteyear
1993 StructuralAmbiguityAndLexicalRelationsDonald Hindle
Mats Rooth
Structural Ambiguity and Lexical Relationshttp://www.aclweb.org/anthology-new/J/J93/J93-1005.pdf