2009 PredatorsorPlowshArmContofRobWeap

• (Sparrow, 2009) ⇒ Robert Sparrow. (2009). “Predators or Plowshares? Arms Control of Robotic Weapons.” In: IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 28(1). doi:10.1109/MTS.2009.931862

Subject Headings: Robotic Weapon, UAV.

Cited By

• ~9 http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Predators+or+Plowshares%3F+Arms+Control+of+Robotic+Weapons%22+2009

Quotes

Abstract

With the development of the General Atomics MQ-1 Predator, robotic weapons came of age. The operations of this unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and northern Africa in the last few years have given us a glimpse of the future of high-tech war. It is a future in which thousands of miles separate those firing weapons from those whom they kill, in which joystick jockeys have replaced pilots and soldiers, and in which the psychological barriers to killing are greatly reduced by the distance between weapon operators and their targets. Perhaps more importantly, it is a future in which wars are more likely, in which decisions about when weapons are fired and who they are fired at are increasingly in the hands of machines, and in which the public has little knowledge of or control over what is being done in its name. Finally, it is a future that is likely to come about not because it represents a better, less destructive, way of fighting war but because the dynamics driving the development of unmanned weapon systems (UMS) are likely to dictate that they be used more and more often. Now that we have had a glimpse of this future, it is time to begin thinking about whether - and how - we might avoid it by adopting an arms control regime designed to limit the development and deployment of robotic weapons.

References

• T.K. Adams, “Future warfare and the decline of human decision-making,” Parameters: U.S. Army War College Quart., pp. 57-71, Wint. 2001-2002.
• R.C. Arkin, Governing Lethal Behavior : Embedd ing Ethics in a Hybr id Deliberat ive / React ive Robot Arch itecture, Mobile Robot Laboratory, College of Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 2007.
• P.M. Asaro, “Robots and responsibility from a legal perspective,” IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation, Rome, Italy, 2007.
• P.M. Asaro, “How just could a robot war be?,” in Current Issues in Computing And Philosophy, P. Brey, A. Briggle, and K. Waelbers, Eds. Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS, 2008.
• C. Beal, “Briefing: Autonomous weapons systems - Brave new world,” Jane’s Defence Weekly, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 22-26, 2000.
• B. Bender, “Attacking Iraq, from a Nev. Computer,” Boston Globe, p. A6, Apr. 3, 2005.
• R. Boland, “Developing reasoning robots for today and tomorrow,” Signal, vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 43-46, 2007.
• J. Boronstein, “The ethics of autonomous military robots,” Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology, vol. 2, no. 1, 2008.
• R. Braybrook, “Drones: Complete guide, Armada Int., vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 1-36, 2007.
• A. Butler, “Global Hawk UAV supports border ops in Iraq,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, vol. 166, no. 11, p. 56, 2007.
• J. S. Canning, A Definitive Work on Factors Impacting the Arming of Unmanned Vehicles. Washington, DC: Dahlgren Division Naval Surface Warfare Center, 2005.
• R.E. (Col.) Chapman, “Unmanned combat aerial vehicles: Dawn of a new age?,” Aerospace Power J., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 60-73, 2002.
• Department of the Navy, The Navy Unmanned Undersea Vehicle (UUV) Master Plan, 2004; http://www.navy.mil/navydata/technology/uuvmp.pdf.
• S.B. Donnelly, “Long-distance warriors,” Time, Dec. 4, 2005.
• C.J. Dunlap, Jr., “Technology: Recomplicating moral life for the nation’s defenders,” Parameters: U.S. Army War College Quart., pp. 24-53, Autm. 1999.
• S. Featherstone, “The coming robot army,” Harper’s, pp. 43-52, Feb. 2007.
• M. Fielding, “Robotics in future land warfare,” Australian Army J., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1-10, 2006.
• S. Graham, “America’s robot army”, New Statesman, vol. 135, no. 4796, pp. 12-15, 2006.
• H. Gulam, and S.W. Lee, “Uninhabited combat aerial vehicles and the law of armed conflict,” Australian Army J., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1-14, 2006.
• J.A. Harley, “Information, technology, and center of gravity,” Naval War College Rev., vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 66-87, 1997.
• H. Hutchinson, “Advances in self-control,” Mechanical Engineering, vol. 128, no. 12, pp. 20, 2006.
• Jane’s Intelligence Digest, “U.S. ties with Pakistan under strain,” Jane’s Intelligence Dig., June 23, 2006.
• S. Kain ika r a, “UCAVs pr obable ly nchpins of future air warfare,” Asia-Pacific Defence Reporter, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 42-45, 2002.
• R.D. Kaplan, “Hunting the Taliban in Las Vegas,” Atlantic Monthly, Aug. 4, 2006.
• J J. Klein, “The problematic nexus: Where unmanned combat air vehicles and the law of armed conflict meet,” Air and Space Power J. Chronicles Online, July 22, 2003; www.airpower.maxwell.af.mil/airchronicles/cc/klein.html, accessed Mar. 27, 2007.
• A. J. Lazarski, “Legal implications of the uninhabited combat aerial vehicle,” Air and Space Power J., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 74-83, 2002.
• W. Legien, C-J. Andersson, and G. Hansen, “UUV and USV: Which ‘unmanned’ for what task?” Naval Forces, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 44-51, 2006.
• P. Marks, “Robot infantry get ready for the battlefield”, New Scientist, vol. 191, no. 2570, p. 28, 2006.
• P. Marks, “Armchair warfare,” New Scientist, vol. 192, no. 2575, pp. 24, 2006.
• T. Moss, “Airshow China: Chinese companies unveil latest UAV designs,” Jane’s Defence Weekly, Nov. 7, 2008.
• J. Mustin, “Future employment of unmanned aerial vehicles,” Air and Space Power J., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 86-97, 2002.
• Office of the Under Secretary of Defense, Joint Robotics Program Master Plan FY2005: Out front in harm’s way. Washington DC: Offi ce of the Undersecretary of Defense (AT&L), Defense Systems/Land Warfare and Munitions, 2005.
• G.I. Peterson, “Unmanned vehicles: Changing the way to look at the battlespace,” Naval Forces, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 29-38, 2005.
• D. Richardson, “U.S. increasing armed UAV use in Southwest Asia, reports suggest,” Jane’s Missiles and Rockets, Nov. 3, 2008.
• R. Scarborough, “Special report: Unmanned warfare,” Washington Times, May 8, 2005.
• N. Sharkey, “Cassandra or false prophet of doom: AI robots and war,” IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 14-17, 2008.
• N. Sharkey, “Grounds for discrimination: Autonomous robot weapons,” RUSI Defence Systems, pp. 86-89, Oct. 2008.
• J. Sherman, “The drone wars,” Bull. Atomic Scientists, pp. 28-37, 2005.
• R. Sparrow, “Killer robots,” J. Applied Philosophy, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 62-77, 2007.
• R. Sparrow, “Building a better WarBot : Ethical issues in the design of unmanned systems for military applications,” Science and Engineering Ethics, 2009, to be published.
• J.M. Sullivan, “Evolution or revolution? The rise of UAVs,” IEEE Technology & Society Mag., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 43-49, Fall 2006.
• D.L. Ulin, “When robots do the killing,” Los Angeles Times, Jan. 30, 2005.,

	Author	volume	Date Value	title	type	journal	titleUrl	doi	note	year
2009 PredatorsorPlowshArmContofRobWeap	Robert Sparrow			Predators or Plowshares? Arms Control of Robotic Weapons			http://www.sevenhorizons.org/docs/SparrowPredatorsorPlowshares.pdf