2009 TowardsLinguisticallyGroundedOntologies
- (Buitelaar et al., 2009) ⇒ Paul Buitelaar, Philipp Cimiano, Peter Haase, and Michael Sinte. (2009). “Towards Linguistically Grounded Ontologies.” In: Proceedings of the 6th European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC 2009). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02121-3_12
Subject Headings: Linguistically Grounded Ontology.
Notes
- Related Technical Report http://www.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/WBS/pci/lexinfo_tech_report_08.pdf
- It argues that ontologies need a linguistic grounding.
- It defines Linguistic Information to include: part-of-speech, morphological decomposition, subcategorization frames, etc.
- It defines ontology elements to include: concepts, relations, individuals, etc.
- It argues that RDFS or OWL are inadequate to support the encoding of linguistic information.
- It presents a new model to associate ontological representations with linguistic information.
- It uses the example of the German Compound Word “Schweineschnitzel” (pork cutlet) which can be represented in an Ontology as:
- an explicit Ontology Concept.
- a Composite Concept with two explicit Ontology Concepts "cutlet" made of "pork" and an Ontology Relation (e.g. Made Of).
- two explicit Ontology Concepts “cutlet” and “pork” but no Ontology Relation between them
- only one Ontology Concept, e.g. “cutlet”
Cited By
~ 11 http://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=14985855364738431372
Quotes
Abstract
In this paper we argue why it is necessary to associate linguistic information with ontologies and why more expressive models, beyond RDFS, OWL and SKOS, are needed to capture the relation between natural language constructs on the one hand and ontological entities on the other. We argue that in the light of tasks such as ontology-based information extraction, ontology learning and population from text and natural language generation from ontologies, currently available datamodels are not sufficient as they only allow to associate atomic terms without linguistic grounding or structure to ontology elements. Towards realizing a more expressive model for associating linguistic information to ontology elements, we base our work presented here on previously developed models (LingInfo, LexOnto, LMF) and present a new joint model for linguistic grounding of ontologies called LingInfo. LexInfo combines essential design aspects of LingInfo and LexOnto and builds on a sound model for representing computational lexica called LMF which has been recently approved as a standard under ISO.
References
- 1. Sean Bechhofer, F. van Harmelen, J. Hendler, Ian Horrocks, D.L. McGuinees, P.F. Patel-Schneider, and L.A. Stein. OWL Web Ontology Language Reference, 2004.
- 2. D. Brickley and R.V. Guha. RDF Vocabulary Description Language 1.0: RDF Schema. Technical report, W3C, 2002.
- 3. Paul Buitelaar, Philipp Cimiano, P. Haase, and M. Sintek. Towards linguistically grounded ontologies. Technical report, Institute AIFB, Universit¨at Karlsruhe (TH), 2008.
- 4. Paul Buitelaar, T. Declerck, A. Frank, S. Racioppa, M. Kiesel, M. Sintek, R. Engel, M. Romanelli, D. Sonntag, B. Loos, V. Micelli, R. Porzel, and Philipp Cimiano. Linginfo: Design and applications of a model for the integration of linguistic information in ontologies. In: Proceedings of the LREC OntoLex06 Workshop, 2006.
- 5. Paul Buitelaar, M. Sintek, and M. Kiesel. A lexicon model for multilingual/ multimedia ontologies. In: Proceedings of the 3rd European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC06), 2006.
- 6. P. Cimiano, P. Haase, M. Herold, M. Mantel, and Paul Buitelaar. LexOnto: A model for ontology lexicons for ontology-based NLP. In: Proceedings of the ISWC’07 OntoLex Workshop, 2007.
- 7. G. Francopoulo, N. Bel, M. Georg, N. Calzolari, M. Monachini, M. Pet, and C. Soria. Lexical markup framework: ISO standard for semantic information in NLP lexicons. In: Proceedings of the Workshop of the GLDV Working Group on Lexicography at the Biennial Spring Conference of the GLDV, 2007.
- 8. The LMFWorking Group. Language resource management – lexical markup framework (LMF). Technical Report ISO/TC 37/SC 4 N453 (N330 Rev.16), ISO, 2008.
- 9. G. Hirst. Ontology and the lexicon. In S. Staab and R. Studer, editors, Handbook on Ontologies. Springer, 2004.
- 10. D.L. McGuiness and F. van Harmelen. OWL Web Ontology Language Overview. W3C Recommendation, February 2004.
- 11. Alistair Miles, Brian Matthews, Dave Beckett, Dan Brickley, Michael Wilson, and Nikki Rogers. Skos: A language to describe simple knowledge structures for the web. In: Proceedings of the XTech Conference, 2005.
- 12. S. Nirenburg and V. Raskin. Ontological Semantics. MIT Press, 2004.
- 13. A. Oltramari and A. Stellato. Enriching ontologies with linguistic content: An evaluation framework. In: Proceedings of the LREC OntoLex’08 Workshop, 2008.
- 14. W. Peters, E. Montiel-Ponsoda, G. Aguado de Cea, and A. G´omez-Pérez. Localizing ontologies in OWL. In: Proceedings of the ISWC OntoLex’07 Workshop, 2007.
- 15. N. Reiter and Paul Buitelaar. Lexical enrichment of biomedical ontologies. In Violaine Prince and Mathieu Roche, editors, Information Retrieval in Biomedicine: Natural Language Processing for Knowledge Integration. IGI Global, 2009.
- 16. Y. Wilks. The Semantic Web: Apotheosis of annotation, but what are its semantics? IEEE Intelligent Systems, 23(3):41–49, 2008.
,
| Author | volume | Date Value | title | type | journal | titleUrl | doi | note | year | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 TowardsLinguisticallyGroundedOntologies | Paul Buitelaar Philipp Cimiano Peter Haase Michael Sinte | Towards Linguistically Grounded Ontologies | http://www.cimiano.de/Publications/2009/eswc09/eswc09.pdf | 10.1007/978-3-642-02121-3_12 |