2011 TheTownwithNoPovertyTheHealthEf

From GM-RKB
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Subject Headings: Guaranteed Income Program, MINCOME.

Notes

Cited By

Quotes

Author Keywords

Abstract

This paper has two purposes. First, it documents the historical context of MINCOME, a Canadian guaranteed annual income field experiment (1974 to 1979). Second, it uses routinely collected health administration data and a quasi-experimental design to document an 8.5 percent reduction in the hospitalization rate for participants relative to controls, particularly for accidents and injuries and mental health. We also found that participant contacts with physicians declined, especially for mental health, and that more adolescents continued into grade 12. We found no increase in fertility, family dissolution rates, or improved birth outcomes. We conclude that a relatively modest GAI can improve population health, suggesting significant health system savings.

Introduction

The idea of a Guaranteed Annual Income (GAI) is once again receiving attention from policy makers and decision makers at local, provincial, and national levels. In from the Margins, a report of the Standing Senate Committee on Social Affairs (December 2009), made several recommendations for addressing poverty with a GAI. The idea of a GAI for people with disabilities was picked up by a House of Commons committee studying poverty, and in Quebec a government task force went further, recommending a minimum guaranteed income starting at $12,000 for everyone in the province, a proposal that remains controversial.

References

;

 AuthorvolumeDate ValuetitletypejournaltitleUrldoinoteyear
2011 TheTownwithNoPovertyTheHealthEfEvelyn L ForgetThe Town with No Poverty: The Health Effects of a Canadian Guaranteed Annual Income Field Experiment