2015 EqualityBiasImpairsCollectiveDe

From GM-RKB
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Subject Headings: Equality Bias, Collective Decision-Making Task, Perceptual Decision-Making Task.

Notes

Cited By

Quotes

Abstract

We tend to think that everyone deserves an equal say in a debate. This seemingly innocuous assumption can be damaging when we make decisions together as part of a group. To make optimal decisions, group members should weight their differing opinions according to how competent they are relative to one another; whenever they differ in competence, an equal weighting is suboptimal. Here, we asked how people deal with individual differences in competence in the context of a collective perceptual decision-making task. We developed a metric for estimating how participants weight their partner's opinion relative to their own and compared this weighting to an optimal benchmark. Replicated across three countries (Denmark, Iran, and China), we show that participants assigned nearly equal weights to each other's opinions regardless of true differences in their competence - even when informed by explicit feedback about their competence gap or under monetary incentives to maximize collective accuracy. This equality bias, whereby people behave as if they are as good or as bad as their partner, is particularly costly for a group when a competence gap separates its members.

References

;

 AuthorvolumeDate ValuetitletypejournaltitleUrldoinoteyear
2015 EqualityBiasImpairsCollectiveDeAli Mahmoodi
Dan Bang
Karsten Olsen
Yuanyuan Aimee Zhao
Zhenhao Shi
Kristina Broberg
Shervin Safavi
Shihui Han
Majid Nili Ahmadabadi
Chris D. Frith
Andreas Roepstorff
Geraint Rees
Bahador Bahrami
Equality Bias Impairs Collective Decision-making Across Cultures10.1073/pnas.14216921122015