3rd-Party Software Development Framework
(Redirected from 3rd-party software development framework)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
A 3rd-Party Software Development Framework is a software development framework that is a 3rd-party software framework that provides reusable architectural patterns and pre-built components for building software-based systems.
- AKA: External Development Framework, Third-Party Framework, External Software Framework, Third-Party Development Framework.
- Context:
- It can typically enforce 3rd-Party Software Development Framework Architectural Patterns through 3rd-party software development framework inversion of control.
- It can typically provide 3rd-Party Software Development Framework Component Libraries for implementing 3rd-party software development framework functionality.
- It can typically define 3rd-Party Software Development Framework Code Conventions through 3rd-party software development framework coding standards.
- It can typically establish 3rd-Party Software Development Framework APIs for extending 3rd-party software development framework capabilities.
- It can typically implement 3rd-Party Software Development Framework Design Patterns through 3rd-party software development framework templates.
- It can typically support 3rd-Party Software Development Framework Plugin Systems for adding 3rd-party software development framework extensions.
- It can typically maintain 3rd-Party Software Development Framework Version Compatibility through 3rd-party software development framework semantic versioning.
- It can typically generate 3rd-Party Software Development Framework Scaffolds through 3rd-party software development framework code generators.
- It can typically enforce 3rd-Party Software Development Framework Best Practices through 3rd-party software development framework opinionated defaults.
- It can typically provide 3rd-Party Software Development Framework Error Handling through 3rd-party software development framework exception management.
- ...
- It can often include 3rd-Party Software Development Framework Documentation for learning 3rd-party software development framework usage.
- It can often provide 3rd-Party Software Development Framework CLI Tools for managing 3rd-party software development framework projects.
- It can often facilitate 3rd-Party Software Development Framework Testing Utilities for validating 3rd-party software development framework implementations.
- It can often enable 3rd-Party Software Development Framework Hot Reloading for accelerating 3rd-party software development framework development cycles.
- It can often support 3rd-Party Software Development Framework Package Management through 3rd-party software development framework dependency systems.
- It can often implement 3rd-Party Software Development Framework Performance Optimizations through 3rd-party software development framework caching.
- It can often provide 3rd-Party Software Development Framework Security Features through 3rd-party software development framework authentication modules.
- It can often offer 3rd-Party Software Development Framework Community Support through 3rd-party software development framework forums.
- It can often include 3rd-Party Software Development Framework Debugging Tools for troubleshooting 3rd-party software development framework applications.
- It can often support 3rd-Party Software Development Framework Database Integration through 3rd-party software development framework ORMs.
- It can often enable 3rd-Party Software Development Framework Middleware Systems for handling 3rd-party software development framework cross-cutting concerns.
- It can often provide 3rd-Party Software Development Framework Template Engines for generating 3rd-party software development framework outputs.
- ...
- It can range from being a Basic 3rd-Party Software Development Framework to being a Full-Stack 3rd-Party Software Development Framework, depending on its 3rd-party software development framework component coverage.
- It can range from being a Domain-Specific 3rd-Party Software Development Framework to being a General-Purpose 3rd-Party Software Development Framework, depending on its 3rd-party software development framework application scope.
- It can range from being a Single-Language 3rd-Party Software Development Framework to being a Cross-Language 3rd-Party Software Development Framework, depending on its 3rd-party software development framework language support.
- It can range from being a Lightweight 3rd-Party Software Development Framework to being an Enterprise 3rd-Party Software Development Framework, depending on its 3rd-party software development framework architectural complexity.
- It can range from being an Open-Source 3rd-Party Software Development Framework to being a Proprietary 3rd-Party Software Development Framework, depending on its 3rd-party software development framework licensing model.
- It can range from being a Convention-Based 3rd-Party Software Development Framework to being a Configuration-Based 3rd-Party Software Development Framework, depending on its 3rd-party software development framework flexibility approach.
- It can range from being a Monolithic 3rd-Party Software Development Framework to being a Modular 3rd-Party Software Development Framework, depending on its 3rd-party software development framework architecture style.
- It can range from being a Stable-API 3rd-Party Software Development Framework to being a Rapidly-Evolving 3rd-Party Software Development Framework, depending on its 3rd-party software development framework evolution pace.
- It can range from being an Opinionated 3rd-Party Software Development Framework to being a Flexible 3rd-Party Software Development Framework, depending on its 3rd-party software development framework prescriptiveness.
- It can range from being a Synchronous 3rd-Party Software Development Framework to being an Asynchronous 3rd-Party Software Development Framework, depending on its 3rd-party software development framework execution model.
- It can range from being a Single-Layer 3rd-Party Software Development Framework to being a Full-Stack 3rd-Party Software Development Framework, depending on its 3rd-party software development framework layer coverage.
- It can range from being a Local-First 3rd-Party Software Development Framework to being a Cloud-Native 3rd-Party Software Development Framework, depending on its 3rd-party software development framework deployment architecture.
- It can range from being a Batteries-Included 3rd-Party Software Development Framework to being a Minimalist 3rd-Party Software Development Framework, depending on its 3rd-party software development framework feature philosophy.
- ...
- It can integrate with 3rd-Party Software Development Tools including 3rd-party software development framework testing tools and 3rd-party software development framework debugging tools.
- It can support Software Programming Languages through 3rd-party software development framework language bindings.
- It can connect to 3rd-Party Software Development Platforms for 3rd-party software development framework deployment.
- It can work with Software Development Kit (SDK)s for 3rd-party software development framework extension development.
- It can enable Integrated Development Environment (IDE) integration through 3rd-party software development framework IDE plugins.
- It can facilitate 3rd-Party Software Development Framework Build Systems for 3rd-party software development framework compilation.
- It can implement 3rd-Party Software Development Framework Middleware for 3rd-party software development framework request processing.
- It can provide 3rd-Party Software Development Framework ORM for 3rd-party software development framework data persistence.
- It can support 3rd-Party Software Development Framework Ecosystems through 3rd-party software development framework plugin marketplaces.
- It can enable 3rd-Party Software Development Framework DevOps Integration through 3rd-party software development framework CI/CD pipelines.
- It can be utilized by Software System Engineering Projects for 3rd-party software development framework-based implementations.
- ...
- Example(s):
- AI and Machine Learning 3rd-Party Software Development Frameworks, such as:
- Deep Learning 3rd-Party Software Development Frameworks, such as:
- Natural Language 3rd-Party Software Development Frameworks, such as:
- Computer Vision 3rd-Party Software Development Frameworks, such as:
- AI Agent 3rd-Party Software Development Frameworks, such as:
- Multi-Agent 3rd-Party Software Development Frameworks for 3rd-party software development framework agent-based systems:
- AutoGen for 3rd-party software development framework orchestrated agent systems.
- LangGraph for 3rd-party software development framework workflow agent systems.
- CrewAI for 3rd-party software development framework collaborative agent systems.
- MetaGPT Framework for 3rd-party software development framework software engineering agent systems.
- Multi-Agent 3rd-Party Software Development Frameworks for 3rd-party software development framework agent-based systems:
- AI-Supported Software Development Frameworks for 3rd-party software development framework ai-assisted coding systems.
- Web Application 3rd-Party Software Development Frameworks, such as:
- Front-End 3rd-Party Software Development Frameworks for 3rd-party software development framework web ui systems:
- React for 3rd-party software development framework component-based systems.
- Angular for 3rd-party software development framework enterprise web systems.
- Vue.js for 3rd-party software development framework progressive web systems.
- Next.js for 3rd-party software development framework server-side rendering systems.
- Svelte for 3rd-party software development framework compiled web systems.
- Ember.js for 3rd-party software development framework convention-driven web systems.
- Backend 3rd-Party Software Development Frameworks for 3rd-party software development framework web service systems:
- Django for 3rd-party software development framework python web systems.
- Spring Framework for 3rd-party software development framework java web systems.
- Ruby on Rails for 3rd-party software development framework ruby web systems.
- Express.js for 3rd-party software development framework node.js web systems.
- Laravel for 3rd-party software development framework php web systems.
- ASP.NET Core for 3rd-party software development framework .net web systems.
- Flask for 3rd-party software development framework python microframework systems.
- FastAPI for 3rd-party software development framework modern python api systems.
- Full-Stack 3rd-Party Software Development Frameworks for 3rd-party software development framework complete web systems:
- Meteor for 3rd-party software development framework javascript web systems.
- ASP.NET for 3rd-party software development framework microsoft web systems.
- Blitz.js for 3rd-party software development framework fullstack react systems.
- RedwoodJS for 3rd-party software development framework jamstack systems.
- Front-End 3rd-Party Software Development Frameworks for 3rd-party software development framework web ui systems:
- Mobile Application 3rd-Party Software Development Frameworks, such as:
- Cross-Platform Mobile 3rd-Party Software Development Frameworks for 3rd-party software development framework multi-platform systems:
- React Native for 3rd-party software development framework javascript mobile systems.
- Flutter for 3rd-party software development framework dart mobile systems.
- Ionic for 3rd-party software development framework hybrid mobile systems.
- Xamarin for 3rd-party software development framework .net mobile systems.
- NativeScript for 3rd-party software development framework native mobile systems.
- Native Mobile 3rd-Party Software Development Frameworks for 3rd-party software development framework platform-specific systems:
- Cross-Platform Mobile 3rd-Party Software Development Frameworks for 3rd-party software development framework multi-platform systems:
- Infrastructure 3rd-Party Software Development Frameworks, such as:
- Data Processing 3rd-Party Software Development Frameworks for 3rd-party software development framework data systems:
- Apache Hadoop for 3rd-party software development framework distributed data systems.
- Apache Spark for 3rd-party software development framework big data systems.
- Apache Flink for 3rd-party software development framework stream processing systems.
- Apache Beam for 3rd-party software development framework unified data processing systems.
- Apache Storm for 3rd-party software development framework real-time computation systems.
- Cloud Infrastructure 3rd-Party Software Development Frameworks for 3rd-party software development framework cloud systems:
- AWS Cloud Development Kit (CDK) for 3rd-party software development framework aws cloud systems.
- Terraform for 3rd-party software development framework infrastructure as code systems.
- Pulumi for 3rd-party software development framework cloud automation systems.
- Google Developers Framework for 3rd-party software development framework google cloud systems.
- Serverless Framework for 3rd-party software development framework serverless application systems.
- Data Processing 3rd-Party Software Development Frameworks for 3rd-party software development framework data systems:
- Platform-Specific 3rd-Party Software Development Frameworks, such as:
- Testing 3rd-Party Software Development Frameworks, such as:
- Unit Testing 3rd-Party Software Development Frameworks for 3rd-party software development framework code testing systems:
- JUnit for 3rd-party software development framework java testing systems.
- pytest for 3rd-party software development framework python testing systems.
- Jest for 3rd-party software development framework javascript testing systems.
- RSpec for 3rd-party software development framework ruby testing systems.
- NUnit for 3rd-party software development framework .net testing systems.
- Mocha for 3rd-party software development framework node.js testing systems.
- Integration Testing 3rd-Party Software Development Frameworks for 3rd-party software development framework end-to-end systems:
- Selenium for 3rd-party software development framework browser automation systems.
- Cypress for 3rd-party software development framework modern testing systems.
- Playwright for 3rd-party software development framework cross-browser testing systems.
- Puppeteer for 3rd-party software development framework headless browser systems.
- Behavior-Driven Testing 3rd-Party Software Development Frameworks for 3rd-party software development framework bdd systems:
- Unit Testing 3rd-Party Software Development Frameworks for 3rd-party software development framework code testing systems:
- Game Development 3rd-Party Software Development Frameworks for 3rd-party software development framework gaming systems:
- Unity for 3rd-party software development framework cross-platform game systems.
- Unreal Engine for 3rd-party software development framework high-performance game systems.
- Godot for 3rd-party software development framework open-source game systems.
- Phaser for 3rd-party software development framework html5 game systems.
- Cocos2d for 3rd-party software development framework 2d game systems.
- Enterprise Application 3rd-Party Software Development Frameworks, such as:
- IoT 3rd-Party Software Development Frameworks, such as:
- Blockchain 3rd-Party Software Development Frameworks, such as:
- Desktop Application 3rd-Party Software Development Frameworks, such as:
- Microservices 3rd-Party Software Development Frameworks, such as:
- LLM Application Development Frameworks, such as:
- ...
- AI and Machine Learning 3rd-Party Software Development Frameworks, such as:
- Counter-Example(s):
- Software Library, which provides utility functions without 3rd-party software development framework comprehensive structure or 3rd-party software development framework inversion of control.
- Programming Language, which offers syntax and semantics without 3rd-party software development framework architectural patterns or 3rd-party software development framework application scaffolds.
- Software Toolkit, which provides development tools without 3rd-party software development framework application scaffolds or 3rd-party software development framework control flow management.
- 3rd-Party Software Platform, which offers runtime services without 3rd-party software development framework code structures or 3rd-party software development framework development patterns.
- Software Development Kit (SDK), which provides development tools without 3rd-party software development framework opinionated architecture or 3rd-party software development framework control inversion.
- In-House Development Framework, which is developed internally without 3rd-party software development framework external vendor support or 3rd-party software development framework community ecosystem.
- Software System Monitoring Framework, which provides monitoring capabilities without 3rd-party software development framework development structures or 3rd-party software development framework code scaffolds.
- See: Software Framework, 3rd-Party Software Framework, Software Development Framework, Software Application Development Framework, Front-End Software Development Framework, Full-Stack Software Development Framework, 3rd-Party Software Development Platform, Software Platform, GCP Firebase Platform, Salesforce Lightning Platform, Software System Engineering Project, Integrated Development Environment (IDE), Application Development, Programming Paradigm, Software Design Pattern, Middleware, Web Services, Software Development Kit (SDK), Software Code Development Process, Model-View-Controller Software Framework, Web Application Framework (WAF), Software Development Tool, Software Component, Inversion of Control, Dependency Injection, Template Method Pattern, Low-Code Development Environment, User Interface (UI) Development Framework, Mobile Application Development Framework, AI System Development Framework, Software Development Endeavour, Prebuilt Software System, Convention over Configuration, Domain-Driven Design, Test-Driven Development, DevOps Practice, Continuous Integration, Continuous Deployment, Package Manager, Build Tool, Version Control System.
References
References
2025-06-29
- Deep Research https://chatgpt.com/s/dr_6861dcd923ac8191b8d8dfb1c4f5ebdb
- Question: What is a 3rd-party software development framework? Provide examples that illustrate the definition and context, as well as near-related counter-examples.
- Answer: A 3rd-Party Software Development Framework (also known as an external development framework) is a reusable software framework provided by an entity other than the original developer of the platform or programming language. It is a pre-built software abstraction that offers a foundation of generic functionality – including architectural patterns and pre-built components – which developers can extend with their own code to build applications.
- Key Characteristics:
- Enforced Architecture & Inversion of Control: Third-party frameworks typically enforce specific architectural patterns or project structures. For example, many frameworks impose MVC (Model-View-Controller) or similar architectures, ensuring a separation of concerns. They achieve this through inversion of control, meaning the framework owns the main program loop and calls the developer's code at certain points. This design provides a skeletal structure or "scaffold" that developers fill in with custom code. As Martin Fowler explains, "A framework embodies some abstract design... you insert your behavior into various places in the framework... The framework's code then calls your code at these points." By dictating the high-level flow, frameworks ensure consistency across applications and free developers from dealing with low-level orchestration. (In contrast, a library doesn't impose structure – the developer's code is in full control and simply calls library functions when needed.) The IoC principle is often implemented via patterns like the Template Method, where the framework provides a template of operations and the developer overrides specific steps.
- Reusable Components and Modules: A major benefit of using a framework is the rich component library it provides out-of-the-box. Frameworks include pre-built modules for common functionality – saving developers time and ensuring robust implementations. For instance, modern web frameworks come with components for routing URL requests to code, rendering UI views or pages, form handling and validation, database access via an ORM (Object-Relational Mapper), session management, and more. These generic components handle repetitive or boilerplate tasks so that developers can focus on the unique business logic of their application. This aligns with the DRY ("Don't Repeat Yourself") principle: common requirements (e.g. user authentication, data persistence, caching, etc.) are solved once in the framework and reused everywhere. For example, the Django framework includes an ORM and an admin panel for database operations, and Laravel provides built-in modules for authentication, routing, and caching. By using these pre-built pieces, developers write less code from scratch, which leads to faster development and fewer bugs. In short, a third-party framework serves as a pre-fabricated skeleton of an application with many parts already built and ready to plug in.
- Coding Conventions and Best Practices: Most frameworks are opinionated: they impose certain coding conventions, project layouts, and design patterns as part of their philosophy. These framework conventions (often "configurations by default") help maintain consistency and encourage best practices. For example, Ruby on Rails famously follows "Convention over Configuration," meaning if you name and structure things according to Rails' guidelines, a lot of configuration is not needed – the framework will automatically wire things together. This leads to rapid development since developers adhere to a standard way of doing things rather than making every decision from scratch. Frameworks may dictate how files are organized (e.g. separate folders for models, views, controllers), how classes are named, or how database tables correspond to classes. By doing so, they ensure that any developer familiar with the framework can quickly understand a project's structure. Conventions also typically embed industry best practices. For instance, a framework might enforce MVC or MVVM patterns, encourage separation of concerns, and include secure default behaviors (like escaping outputs to prevent XSS by default). Overall, these coding standards result in cleaner, more maintainable codebases. The trade-off is that opinionated frameworks leave less flexibility – developers work within the framework's guidelines (which are often a reasonable trade for productivity). On the other hand, there are also more flexible frameworks that are minimally opinionated, giving developers more freedom at the cost of writing or configuring more things themselves.
- Extensibility via APIs and Plugins: A well-designed third-party framework is extensible – it allows developers to add or override functionality without modifying the framework's own source code. This is usually achieved through clear extension points, such as plugin systems, hooks/events, abstract base classes to subclass, or service provider interfaces. The framework typically provides a public API or hook mechanism for plugging in custom components. For example, a web framework might let you register middleware components or route handlers via an API, or a game engine framework might support plugins for physics or graphics. Many frameworks support a plugin architecture: developers or third parties can create add-ons or modules that augment the framework (for instance, authentication plugins, payment gateway integrations, etc., that "plug in" to the core framework). Because these extensions use the framework's official APIs, they can be added or removed cleanly without hacking the framework itself. The framework thus maintains a stable core that accepts extensions – following the Open/Closed principle (open for extension, closed for modification). A concrete example is Visual Studio Code's extension framework (though VSCode is an application, not a dev framework, its architecture is similar) where new functionality can be added via an API. In the context of development frameworks: WordPress, for instance, allows plugins and themes to extend its CMS capabilities; Node.js frameworks like Express or NestJS allow middleware modules; Unity (a game development framework) has a plugin ecosystem for custom editors or shaders. This modularity ensures that a third-party framework can grow and adapt to new needs without developers reinventing the wheel or altering core code. The presence of a robust ecosystem of plugins and integrations is often a sign of a healthy framework community.
- Default Behavior and Scaffolding: Frameworks typically provide sensible default behaviors so that a basic application can run with minimal configuration. They often include project templates or scaffolding tools to generate starter code. For example, running django-admin startproject creates a new Django project with default settings, directory structure, and initial code; Angular's CLI can generate a new Angular app with a ready-to-run setup; Rails can scaffold a new resource (model, controller, views) with one command. These features reflect that frameworks are intentionally incomplete – they provide an abstract, generic implementation of common features and leave "white spots" for developers to fill with application-specific code. A framework's CLI tool or generator often asks a few questions (project name, options) and then produces a boilerplate project that adheres to the framework's conventions. This jump-starts development by handling repetitive setup tasks. Additionally, many frameworks include default implementations or stubs for things like error handling, logging, and configuration, which work out-of-the-box but can be overridden if needed. The benefit of these defaults is twofold: newcomers can get something working quickly (reducing the learning curve), and all projects share a common baseline structure. Developers can then gradually customize or configure beyond the defaults as requirements dictate. In summary, a third-party framework often acts as a starter kit for an application, with a lot of functionality "wired in" by default, which can be extended or tweaked via provided hooks and configuration files.
- Non-Modifiable Core & Versioning Guarantees: One characteristic of frameworks (especially in contrast to in-house code) is that the framework's core code is not meant to be modified by application developers. The framework is maintained by its creators or open-source community, and developers plug their code into it, rather than forking or altering it. This ensures that updates and patches to the framework can be applied without merging local changes. As a result, frameworks usually follow a clear versioning scheme (often semantic versioning) to signal changes and maintain backward compatibility where possible. Semantic versioning (SemVer) uses version numbers (MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH) to indicate compatibility: if only the patch or minor version changes, the update should be backward-compatible; a MAJOR version change may introduce breaking changes. Well-established frameworks place a high priority on maintaining stable APIs across minor versions so that the thousands of applications depending on them don't break on upgrade. For example, the Spring Framework and .NET Framework emphasize long-term support and backward compatibility, while JavaScript frameworks like Angular famously introduced breaking changes between AngularJS (1.x) and Angular 2 – effectively a new framework, hence a major version leap. Some frameworks offer LTS (Long Term Support) releases to provide bug fixes for a stable API over several years. Others, especially newer ones, may evolve rapidly with frequent major releases (e.g. a hypothetical "rapidly-evolving framework" might hit version 5.0, 6.0, 7.0 in a short span, with breaking changes each time). The range is wide: some third-party frameworks are stable and mature – they change slowly and prioritize not breaking existing projects, while others are fast-moving – adopting the latest innovations quickly at the expense of stability. In all cases, semantic versioning and changelogs help developers manage upgrades, and dependency management tools (like npm or Maven) help lock to specific versions. Using a third-party framework thus implies you rely on the maintainers for updates/patches, and you follow their upgrade paths rather than editing the framework yourself.
- Common Tools and Features:
- Documentation and Learning Resources: Because frameworks introduce their own abstractions and patterns, good documentation is critical. Most third-party frameworks include extensive documentation, tutorials, and example projects. They often maintain an official website with guides and API references, and many have books or community-written guides as well. In addition, popular frameworks benefit from community knowledge: blog posts, Q&A sites, and forums where developers share solutions. A strong community means that if you run into a problem, it's likely someone has already documented it. Robust communities provide invaluable support and resources – community forums and rich documentation offer solutions to common (and complex) problems. This communal support can significantly reduce development time, as developers can draw on collective experience. Many frameworks also keep an up-to-date FAQ and release notes to help with troubleshooting and upgrading. Essentially, when you adopt a third-party framework, you also tap into a support network around it, which is a key part of its value proposition.
- CLI Tools and Project Scaffolding: Almost every major framework comes with a command-line interface (CLI) or tool for managing projects. These CLI tools can generate new projects or components, run development servers, build the application for production, run tests, etc. For example, Angular CLI, Vue CLI, Create React App, Ember CLI, Rails commands, Django's manage.py, and many others serve this purpose. With a single command, a developer can bootstrap a fully-structured project with default configurations. CLI tools often also provide generators for adding new pieces to an existing project – e.g., generating a new module, component, or controller following the framework's patterns. This dramatically speeds up development setup and enforces consistency. Scaffolding via CLI not only saves time but also ensures that the created components follow the framework's recommended practices. In addition, these tools might handle tasks like dependency installation, running linters or formatters, and packaging the app. In summary, CLI tools are an integral part of the developer experience for many frameworks, turning many setup or boilerplate coding steps into automated commands.
- Automated Testing Support: Third-party frameworks often integrate with testing frameworks or include their own testing utilities to encourage a test-driven approach. For instance, the Django Framework comes with a built-in test runner and extends Python's unittest to support testing of Django-specific features. It provides utilities to simulate web requests and verify responses, making it easier to write unit and integration tests for web apps. Similarly, front-end frameworks like Angular set up projects with testing in mind (e.g., using Jasmine and Karma for unit tests, with configuration ready to go). Many frameworks either bundle a testing library or have official recommendations on what to use (e.g., React recommends Jest, Ruby on Rails includes an integrated testing framework and also supports RSpec, etc.). The key is that frameworks try to simplify the process of writing tests in the context of the framework's structure. They might include mock objects, in-memory databases for testing, or command-line test runners. By making testing a first-class citizen, frameworks help developers catch bugs early and ensure that extensions or modifications to the framework's components work as expected. In complex applications that "grow" on a framework, having a built-in way to write unit tests and integration tests is invaluable to maintain quality.
- Hot Reloading and Live Development: To boost developer productivity, many frameworks support hot reloading or live reloading during development. Hot reloading means that when you edit your code, the framework (often via a development server or build tool) automatically reloads the changes in the running application without a full restart. This is common in web development frameworks (e.g., React's development server supports hot module replacement, Next.js does hot refresh on save, etc.) and in some mobile frameworks (React Native, Flutter's Hot Reload feature). The idea is to see your changes immediately, preserving the application's state if possible, so you don't have to manually stop, rebuild, and restart the app on every tweak. For backend frameworks, tools like JRebel (Java) or Nodemon (Node.js) provide similar auto-reloading. The NestJS server-side framework, for example, uses Webpack's Hot Module Replacement to reload only changed modules, drastically reducing recompile time and making iterative development faster. Hot reload features "significantly decrease the amount of time necessary to instantiate your application, making iterative development a lot easier." In summary, hot reloading shortens the feedback loop: developers see the effect of code changes in real time, which speeds up debugging and UI tuning.
- Dependency Management and Packaging: Third-party frameworks are usually distributed as packages through language-specific package managers (such as npm for JavaScript, PyPI for Python, RubyGems for Ruby, NuGet for .NET, Maven/Central for Java, etc.). Adopting a framework typically means adding the framework's package to your project's dependencies. The framework may in turn depend on other libraries, which the package manager will fetch and manage. This means frameworks often come with a defined set of compatible dependency versions (e.g., a specific range of library versions that are known to work). Some frameworks also offer meta-packages or installers that bundle multiple related packages. For instance, a "full-stack" framework might actually consist of several coordinated packages (one for the core, one for the CLI, one for an ORM, etc.). The package management system helps keep these in sync. Additionally, frameworks sometimes provide their own plugin/package ecosystems – for example, Flutter has a package repository (Pub.dev) for plugins compatible with the Flutter framework, and Django has a rich ecosystem of reusable Django "apps" that can be plugged into any Django project. Using a package manager also makes it easier to update the framework version and apply security patches. In summary, third-party frameworks leverage standard package management to integrate into projects, and often create a wider ecosystem of add-on packages around themselves to extend functionality.
- Built-in Performance Optimizations: Many frameworks incorporate performance optimizations and tools to help applications run efficiently. One common example is caching mechanisms. Web frameworks frequently include caching layers – for instance, Django has a built-in caching framework that lets developers cache the results of expensive computations or database queries with a few lines of code. This can dramatically improve response times by avoiding repeated work. Similarly, frameworks might provide support for content compression, efficient asset loading (for front-end frameworks), query optimizations via ORMs, and so on. For example, ASP.NET Core (a Microsoft web framework) provides middleware for response caching and compressing static files; many frameworks allow easy configuration of in-memory caches or use of external cache stores (like Redis) through the framework's settings. The idea is that the framework has been designed with performance in mind – it will have profiled solutions for common bottlenecks and make those available. "Django's caching framework provides a simple and efficient way to cache the results of expensive computations, database queries, and templates," thereby reducing server load and speeding up pages. Additionally, frameworks often use efficient algorithms and data structures under the hood (e.g. a high-performance routing engine in a web framework, or batch updates to the DOM in a UI framework) that improve performance without the developer needing to do anything. Some frameworks can even automatically apply performance best practices – for example, Next.js (React framework) will code-split and lazy-load modules by default, and Spring Boot can configure connection pools for database access for optimal throughput. In short, by using a popular third-party framework, you inherit a lot of performance engineering that has been built into it over time (and often battle-tested in many production systems).
- Security Features and Updates: Security is a critical aspect that frameworks help with. Third-party frameworks often include built-in security features or follow secure defaults so developers don't unknowingly introduce vulnerabilities. For example, web frameworks handle input sanitization or output encoding to prevent SQL injection and XSS attacks by default in their templating engines. Many frameworks come with an authentication/authorization module or integration – e.g., Django's django.contrib.auth provides a full user authentication system out-of-the-box, and Spring Security is a suite that plugs into Spring-based frameworks to handle security concerns. Using these pre-built modules is safer than writing your own ad-hoc authentication logic. Frameworks also often enforce secure practices; for instance, they might require HTTPS for certain operations or include CSRF protection middleware automatically. According to the OWASP organization, "using established frameworks and libraries with secure defaults significantly reduces the risk of common security vulnerabilities." The collective maintenance means that when a security issue is discovered in the framework, the maintainers will release a patch, and developers can update the framework version to get the fix (rather than hoping each individual developer fixes the issue in their own code). This is another reason semantic versioning and updates are important – critical security patches might be backported to minor releases for older major versions. As an example of built-in security, consider Laravel (a PHP framework): it includes features like hashed passwords, prepared statements for database queries, and guards against SQL injection by default, as well as an easy way to implement role-based access control. The GeeksforGeeks guide on third-party packages notes that one advantage is "in-built security features", as the framework's code has been used and vetted by many, curing bugs and vulnerabilities in advance. Overall, by leveraging a third-party framework, a developer is less likely to introduce basic security mistakes, and they benefit from the security expertise of the framework's developers.
- Community and Ecosystem Support: A strong third-party framework usually comes with a vibrant ecosystem. This includes not only the aforementioned documentation and plugins, but also community forums, user groups, conferences, and frequent updates. The community support means you can often find quick help or existing solutions for your problems. For example, frameworks like React, Angular, or Spring have huge communities: thousands of questions on Stack Overflow, community-maintained tutorials, and many open-source extensions. "Robust communities provide invaluable support… Community forums and documentation are rich sources of information. Regular updates and contributions from the community keep the frameworks relevant." This implies that popular frameworks are continuously improved and adapted to new technologies (for instance, adding support for new language versions, new standards, etc.). The ecosystem might also encompass related tools: for a given framework, there may be IDE plugins that facilitate development (e.g., IntelliJ has special support for Angular and Spring projects), or integration with cloud deployment services, etc. When evaluating a third-party framework, the size and health of its community is a key factor – it can determine the longevity of the framework and the availability of help. A wide community often results in a plethora of third-party packages (e.g., NPM has many packages specifically built to work with Express or Vue or others), which further extends what you can do with the framework. In short, using a third-party framework is not just adopting a set of libraries – it's joining a community of practice and an ecosystem of tools that together greatly enhance development productivity and support.
- Comprehensive Description: Given these varying characteristics, it's clear that "3rd-Party Software Development Framework" is an umbrella term. It covers everything from a basic utility framework (maybe a small MVC library) to a full-stack, enterprise-grade framework with every bell and whistle. It can be domain-specific (like a game engine, or a scientific computing framework) or general-purpose for any kind of app. It might be tightly coupled to one language or work across multiple. It can be open-source or proprietary, lightweight or heavy, opinionated or flexible, synchronous or asynchronous – these are all just traits that particular frameworks may have in differing degrees.
- Types of 3rd-Party Frameworks:
- Full-Stack vs. Specialized Frameworks: Some frameworks are full-stack, meaning they provide tools for both front-end and back-end development (covering the entire application stack). A full-stack framework typically includes everything needed to build a complete application: front-end UI components or templating, back-end business logic organization, database layer, and often additional utilities (authentication, routing, etc.) all integrated. Ruby on Rails is a classic full-stack web framework – it can render HTML on the server, manage database interactions, and handle web requests, all within one cohesive system. Django (Python) and Laravel (PHP) are also full-stack web frameworks with "batteries included" (Django's philosophy). On the other hand, some frameworks are more specialized or lightweight – for example, Express.js is a minimalist back-end framework for Node.js that focuses mainly on HTTP request handling and leaves other concerns (like view rendering or database access) to additional libraries. Likewise, React is a front-end UI library (often called a framework due to its ecosystem) that focuses only on the user interface, not on data storage or server-side logic. In practice, developers often mix specialized frameworks (e.g., using React on the front-end with Express or Django on the back-end). There are also frontend-specific frameworks (like Angular, Vue.js, Svelte) and backend-specific frameworks (like Spring Framework for Java, Flask for Python, ASP.NET Core for C#). A full-stack JavaScript framework like Next.js or Meteor provides both server-side and client-side capabilities in one package. Thus, third-party frameworks range from narrow in scope (just one layer of the stack) to very broad (covering multiple layers).
- Domain-Specific vs. General-Purpose: Frameworks can be categorized by whether they target a specific application domain or are intended for general application development. A general-purpose development framework is one that can be used to build a wide variety of applications in different domains. Most web frameworks fall in this category – you can use ASP.NET or Rails to build anything from a blog to an e-commerce site to an API server. By contrast, a domain-specific framework is tailored for a particular kind of software or industry. For example, Spring Batch is a framework specifically for batch processing jobs; it provides patterns and components useful for batch ETL processes and is less useful outside that domain. In data science and AI, we have frameworks like TensorFlow or PyTorch which are specialized for machine learning tasks – they provide the building blocks for neural networks and model training. Unity3D and Unreal Engine are frameworks (game engines) specialized for game development – with graphics rendering, physics, and asset pipelines geared towards building games. Apache Hadoop and Apache Spark are frameworks for big data processing and analytics, not for building, say, a user-facing web app. Domain-specific frameworks come with higher-level abstractions suited to their field; for instance, a game framework might have concepts like an "entity" or "scene" built-in, and a finance-oriented framework might have ledger or transaction abstractions. Meanwhile, general-purpose frameworks stick to generic building blocks (controllers, views, data access) and leave domain logic to the developer. Many third-party frameworks in specialized domains (like robotics, embedded systems, scientific computing) exist to accelerate those particular use-cases. Choosing a domain-specific framework can greatly boost productivity if your project's domain matches, but it may impose assumptions that don't generalize outside that context. On the other hand, general-purpose frameworks are more flexible but sometimes require more work to adapt to a specific domain. Often the line can blur: for example, Angular is general-purpose for web apps, but you might consider SAP's ABAP framework domain-specific for enterprise business apps, or Robot Operating System (ROS) a framework specific to robotics. The key is that third-party frameworks span everything from basic, generic frameworks to highly specialized ones for particular problem domains.
- Single-Language vs. Cross-Language: Most frameworks are designed for a particular programming language or ecosystem. For instance, if you're using Python, you might choose Django or Flask; for JavaScript/TypeScript, you have Angular, Vue, Next.js, etc.; for Java, you have Spring or Jakarta EE; for C#, .NET has its framework. These are single-language frameworks in the sense that they expect you to write the bulk of your code in a specific language and often integrate tightly with that language's features. However, some frameworks are more cross-language or provide language bindings to multiple languages. A good example is the TensorFlow machine learning framework: while its core is in C++ and it's primarily used in Python, there are official APIs for JavaScript (TensorFlow.js), mobile (TensorFlow Lite for Swift/Java), and others. Another example is Qt, a GUI framework written in C++ that provides bindings for Python (PyQt/PySide), Julia, and other languages – so developers in different languages can use the same framework capabilities. Generally, frameworks that are more like engines or platforms (Unity, Unreal) allow coding in multiple languages (Unity supports C# and its own scripting; Unreal Engine supports C++ and a visual Blueprint language, etc.). Cross-language frameworks often achieve this via a core library in one language and wrappers in others. There are also frameworks that aim to be language-agnostic by focusing on standards – for example, some microservices frameworks allow you to write services in any language as long as they conform to certain protocols (though one might argue those are more platforms than frameworks). The majority, however, are tied to a language: a "third-party framework" is usually discussed in the context of that language's ecosystem (e.g., "Which JavaScript framework are you using?" or "Which Python web framework do we adopt?"). It's worth noting also that some frameworks spawn similar implementations in other languages – e.g., the MVC pattern of Rails (Ruby) inspired Laravel (PHP) and others, but each is separate per language.
- Lightweight vs. Enterprise-Grade: Third-party frameworks vary in complexity and size. Lightweight frameworks (sometimes called micro-frameworks) aim to do a limited set of things very simply and have a small footprint. An example is Flask for Python – it's essentially a micro web framework that gives you basic routing and request handling, but leaves database integration, form handling, etc., up to extensions or your own code. Sinatra in Ruby is similar. These lightweight frameworks are easy to learn and flexible, but you'll have to assemble more pieces yourself if you need a full-featured app. On the flip side, enterprise frameworks or "heavyweight" frameworks come with a ton of features and abstractions intended for large, complex applications. Java's Spring Framework (and the broader Spring ecosystem) is an enterprise-grade framework: it can handle web requests, data access, security, transactions, and much more, often with configurability to integrate into complex enterprise environments. Enterprise frameworks often provide inversion-of-control containers, dependency injection, and integration with enterprise services. They might have steeper learning curves and require dealing with configuration (XML or annotations etc., in Java frameworks historically) – hence sometimes being called "heavyweight." They also may enforce stricter design patterns (which in a large team or critical application can be beneficial for consistency and robustness). Over time, many enterprise frameworks have tried to become more lightweight (e.g., modern Spring Boot uses convention-over-configuration like a lighter framework). Conversely, some lightweight frameworks gain features and become heavier over time. The spectrum ranges from a small framework you can read in one file, to something that involves dozens of modules and a thick reference manual. Choosing between them depends on the project requirements: a quick prototype might use a micro-framework for speed, whereas a mission-critical banking system might need an enterprise framework that supports clustering, transactions, and strict typing, for example. Thus, third-party frameworks can be minimalist or comprehensively featured, and everything in between.
- Open-Source vs. Proprietary: The majority of popular development frameworks today are open-source – meaning their source code is publicly available, and they often have permissive licenses (MIT, Apache, etc.) or copyleft (GPL, LGPL) licenses. Examples: React (MIT licensed by Meta), Angular (MIT by Google), Spring (Apache license by Pivotal/VMware), Django (BSD), Laravel (MIT), etc. Open-source frameworks benefit from community contributions and widespread adoption. There are also proprietary frameworks – usually provided by a company as part of a commercial product or platform. For instance, Adobe Flex (for Flash) was a proprietary framework (though later open-sourced), or Microsoft's older MFC (Microsoft Foundation Classes) for C++ was essentially a framework for Windows applications tied to Microsoft's tooling. Proprietary frameworks might come with dedicated support or tools (often as part of an IDE or enterprise suite) but can lock you into a vendor. Another example is Oracle's ADF (Application Development Framework), which is a Java EE framework that is proprietary to Oracle and comes with their tools. The trend has been towards open-source frameworks, even from big vendors (e.g., .NET Core is open source, and many "3rd-party" frameworks originate from open communities). When we say third-party framework, we usually imply it could be open-source (maintained by a community or another company) or closed-source provided by a vendor – the key is it's not built in-house by your team and not part of the core platform by default. Each model has pros and cons: open-source encourages community fixes and transparency, while proprietary might offer official vendor support. But in modern development, open-source 3rd-party frameworks dominate most areas.
- Convention-Based vs. Configuration-Based: As hinted earlier, frameworks differ in how much they rely on convention vs. configuration. Convention-based frameworks (often called "opinionated frameworks") make assumptions and have defaults for everything – if you follow the conventions (e.g., naming a class a certain way, putting files in specific directories), things magically work with little configuration. Ruby on Rails is the poster child for convention-based design: for example, if you have a model class Article, Rails expects the database table to be named articles by default; if you put a template file in the views/articles folder with the right name, it will be picked up for the ArticlesController automatically, etc. This drastically reduces configuration overhead and boilerplate, letting developers move fast. On the other hand, configuration-based frameworks require explicit configuration for many things, which can be more verbose but also more flexible. Older Java frameworks (like early Java EE or Struts) often needed lots of XML or code to wire up components. For example, to map a URL to a controller, you might have had to edit a config file. These frameworks put less "magic" in conventions and instead let you configure everything. Modern frameworks often try to blend both: they use sensible conventions but allow configuration to override or in unusual cases. An example is Spring Boot which has conventions (auto-configuration) but lets you override via properties or beans if needed. The degree of opinionation varies: Ember.js is a very opinionated front-end framework (with a strict project structure), whereas Express.js has almost no structure imposed (you decide how to organize your code). Both are third-party frameworks but with different philosophies. Choosing a convention-heavy vs. configuration-heavy framework depends on team preference: conventions boost productivity if you're fine with the framework's defaults, while configuration-centric might suit teams with very custom needs. We could say frameworks range from highly opinionated to highly flexible.
- Monolithic vs. Modular: Some frameworks are delivered as a single cohesive unit – a monolithic framework where all functionality is part of one package or tightly integrated set of packages. Others are more modular, allowing you to pick and choose parts. For example, the Zend Framework (PHP) was known for being modular – you could use its components independently without using the whole framework. In contrast, something like the old monolithic J2EE application server was all-or-nothing. Today, even large frameworks often have a modular architecture internally (e.g., Spring has sub-projects, Angular is split into core vs optional modules). But the concept can also refer to the style of apps they produce: a monolithic framework might encourage building one self-contained application, whereas some frameworks are geared toward microservices or modular architectures (for instance, lightweight frameworks like Dropwizard or Micronaut in Java for building microservices, or Serverless Framework for building functions). Additionally, "monolithic vs modular" can describe how the framework itself is built – e.g., does it load as one big library, or can you include only certain modules (like including only the ORM part without the web part). Express.js with additional middleware can be seen as modular (you add only what you need), while something like Meteor is more monolithic (it brings everything from database to front-end reactivity in one system). Depending on project needs, a modular approach can save resources and allow mixing technologies, whereas a monolithic framework can provide a lot of functionality with seamless integration out of the box.
- Synchronous vs. Asynchronous Model: Frameworks also differ in their execution model and how they handle concurrency. Traditional frameworks (especially in languages like PHP, Ruby, Python, Java in earlier days) follow a synchronous, blocking model – each request or task is handled in a separate thread or process, and the code executes sequentially (if a call to the database is made, that thread waits for the result). Newer frameworks, especially in the Node.js ecosystem or using Python's asyncio, follow an asynchronous, non-blocking model. For example, Node.js frameworks (Express, Koa, NestJS) use the event loop and async callbacks/promises – this allows a single process to handle many concurrent connections without threads, by interleaving I/O. Similarly, frameworks like Twisted or FastAPI in Python use async I/O for high concurrency. The choice of sync vs async can affect how you write code (callback or await-based logic vs simple sequential logic) and performance characteristics. Some frameworks (and languages) are moving towards providing both options – e.g., Spring (traditionally thread-per-request) now has Spring WebFlux which is reactive and async. When choosing a third-party framework, the concurrency model might be a factor: for building a real-time chat app, an async event-driven framework (like Node's) might handle high concurrency with lower overhead, whereas for a CPU-bound task an async model offers less benefit and a simpler synchronous framework could be fine. Essentially, frameworks range from synchronous (often easier to debug, follows linear code flow) to asynchronous (more scalable for I/O-heavy scenarios), and some are in-between or allow both modes. This dimension often correlates with language (e.g., Node frameworks are async by nature, Go frameworks use goroutines which are sort of synchronous style for the coder but async under the hood, etc.). It's an important architectural consideration that third-party frameworks handle for you – they provide the runtime model so you don't have to build the concurrency management from scratch.
- Key Characteristics:
- Citations:
[1] Wikipedia – Third-party software component: definition of third-party software as components developed by an entity other than the original platform vendor. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-party_software_component [2] Wikipedia – Software framework: definition and characteristics of frameworks (inversion of control, extension points, etc.). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_framework [3] Stack Overflow answer quoting Martin Fowler on framework vs library (Hollywood principle: "don't call us, we'll call you"). https://stackoverflow.com/questions/148747/what-is-the-difference-between-a-framework-and-a-library [4] Spiceworks (via Restaff blog) – Framework as a platform providing a foundation/blueprint for applications. https://www.restaff.no/en/insights/blogs/what-is-a-software-framework-anyway-unpacked-and-explained [5] Restaff Blog – "What is a Software Framework? Unpacked & Explained" – characteristics of frameworks: IoC, extensibility, default behavior, non-modifiable core; frameworks enforce structure and best practices (standardized code, DRY principle); security benefits (secure defaults per OWASP). https://www.restaff.no/en/insights/blogs/what-is-a-software-framework-anyway-unpacked-and-explained [6] GeeksforGeeks – "Role of Third-Party Packages/Frameworks in Web Development" – explanation that frameworks provide ready-to-use code (navbar example) and reduce manual coding; notes on advantages (less code, time-saving, built-in security) and disadvantages (less control, more default behavior). https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/html/role-of-third-party-packages-frameworks-in-web-development/ [7] Resourcely Blog – "12 Scaffolding Tools..." – mentions of Angular CLI, Create React App, Vue CLI, Django's startproject as framework-specific tools that make setup easy. https://www.resourcely.io/post/12-scaffolding-tools [8] MDN Web Docs – Django testing overview – Django's test framework provides classes and tools to simulate requests and test Django-specific behavior. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Learn_web_development/Extensions/Server-side/Django/Testing [9] MDN – Angular testing (via Angular.dev) – Angular CLI sets up everything needed to test an Angular app with Jasmine/Karma. https://angular.dev/guide/testing [10] NestJS Documentation – Hot Reload – benefit of Hot Module Replacement (HMR) for iterative development, reducing recompile times. https://docs.nestjs.com/recipes/hot-reload [11] LinkedIn article on Django Caching – "Django's caching framework provides a simple and efficient way to cache results of expensive database queries or computations" to improve performance. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/caching-performance-speed-up-your-web-application-djangos-saied-00fce [12] MoonTechnolabs Blog – "Top 15 Software Development Frameworks 2025" – notes on frameworks like React Native having robust component libraries and community support; community provides plugins and keeps framework updated. https://www.moontechnolabs.com/blog/software-development-frameworks/ [13] Talent500 Blog – "Top 10 Full Stack Frameworks in 2025" – defines full-stack framework as one covering both frontend and backend in a unified environment; gives examples (Node+Express, Django, Rails, Laravel) and features (built-in auth, ORM, scaffolding). https://talent500.com/blog/top-full-stack-developer-frameworks/ [14] MoonTechnolabs – on Ruby on Rails: emphasizes convention over configuration accelerating development (rapid prototyping with built-in scaffolding, integrated ORM). https://www.moontechnolabs.com/blog/software-development-frameworks/ [15] PhoenixNAP IT Glossary – "What is Third-Party Software?" – defines third-party software as developed by external vendors to add features or integrate with primary systems. https://phoenixnap.com/glossary/third-party-software [16] GM-RKB (Gabor Melli's Knowledge Base) – Entry on 3rd-Party Software Development Framework – provides structured context, including distinctions: libraries (no framework structure), programming languages (no patterns enforced), toolkits (tools without app scaffold), platforms (runtime services without code structure), SDKs (tools without opinionated architecture), in-house frameworks (not externally supported), and monitoring frameworks (monitoring capability without dev structure). These counter-examples clarify what a development framework is not. http://www.gabormelli.com/RKB/3rd-party_software_development_framework
2024
- 3rd-Party Software Development Platforms
- 3rd-Party Integrated Development Environment (IDE)s
- 3rd-Party Low-Code Development Platforms
- 3rd-Party No-Code Development Platforms
- 3rd-Party Web Application Builders (e.g., Webflow, Wix)
- 3rd-Party Mobile App Builders (e.g., Adalo, Thunkable)
- 3rd-Party Game Development Platforms
- 3rd-Party Enterprise Application Development Platforms
- 3rd-Party Software Development Frameworks
- 3rd-Party Web Application Frameworks
- 3rd-Party Frontend Frameworks (e.g., React, Angular)
- 3rd-Party Backend Frameworks (e.g., Django, Ruby on Rails)
- 3rd-Party Full-stack Frameworks (e.g., Meteor)
- 3rd-Party Mobile Development Frameworks
- 3rd-Party Cross-platform Frameworks (e.g., React Native, Flutter)
- 3rd-Party Native Frameworks (e.g., SwiftUI for iOS, Jetpack Compose for Android)
- 3rd-Party Data Processing Frameworks
- 3rd-Party Machine Learning Frameworks
- 3rd-Party Testing and Automation Frameworks
- 3rd-Party Unit Testing Frameworks (e.g., JUnit, pytest)
- 3rd-Party UI Testing Frameworks (e.g., Selenium, Cypress)
- 3rd-Party IoT Development Frameworks
- 3rd-Party Web Application Frameworks
- 3rd-Party Development Tools and Services
- 3rd-Party Cloud and Infrastructure Platforms
- 3rd-Party DevOps and SRE Tools
- 3rd-Party Specialized Development Environments
2022
- https://softwaretestinghelp.com/software-development-tools/
- QUOTE: Best Software Development Tools and Platforms a Developer Should Know: ...
- A computer program that is used by the software developers for creating, editing, maintaining, supporting and debugging other applications, frameworks and programs – is termed as a Software Development Tool or a Software Programming Tool.
- Development tools can be of many forms like linkers, compilers, code editors, GUI designer, assemblers, debugger, performance analysis tools etc. There are certain factors to be considered while selecting the corresponding development tool, based on the type of the project.
- … Given below are few uses of the Software Dev Tools:
- Software tools are used to accomplish and investigate the business processes, document the development process of the software and optimize all the processes.
- By using these tools in the software development process, the outcome of the projects will be more productive.
- Using the development tools, a developer can easily maintain the workflow of the project.
- QUOTE: Best Software Development Tools and Platforms a Developer Should Know: ...
2022
- (Wikipedia, 2022) ⇒ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/software_framework Retrieved:2022-11-1.
- In computer programming, a software framework is an abstraction in which software, providing generic functionality, can be selectively changed by additional user-written code, thus providing application-specific software. It provides a standard way to build and deploy applications and is a universal, reusable software environment that provides particular functionality as part of a larger software platform to facilitate the development of software applications, products and solutions. Software frameworks may include support programs, compilers, code libraries, toolsets, and application programming interfaces (APIs) that bring together all the different components to enable development of a project or system.
Frameworks have key distinguishing features that separate them from normal libraries:
- inversion of control: In a framework, unlike in libraries or in standard user applications, the overall program's flow of control is not dictated by the caller, but by the framework. This is usually achieved with the Template Method Pattern.
- default behaviour: This can be provided with the invariant methods of the Template Method Pattern in an abstract class which is provided by the framework.
- extensibility: A user can extend the framework – usually by selective overriding – or programmers can add specialized user code to provide specific functionality. This is usually achieved by a hook method in a subclass that overrides a template method in the superclass.
- non-modifiable framework code: The framework code, in general, is not supposed to be modified, while accepting user-implemented extensions. In other words, users can extend the framework, but cannot modify its code.
- In computer programming, a software framework is an abstraction in which software, providing generic functionality, can be selectively changed by additional user-written code, thus providing application-specific software. It provides a standard way to build and deploy applications and is a universal, reusable software environment that provides particular functionality as part of a larger software platform to facilitate the development of software applications, products and solutions. Software frameworks may include support programs, compilers, code libraries, toolsets, and application programming interfaces (APIs) that bring together all the different components to enable development of a project or system.
2013
- http://dropwizard.codahale.com/getting-started/
- QUOTE: Dropwizard straddles the line between being a library and a framework. ...