AI Governance Constraint
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
An AI Governance Constraint is a policy-based enforceable operational constraint that restricts AI system behaviors, capability utilizations, and configuration choices to ensure compliance, safety, and ethical alignment.
- AKA: AI Policy Constraint, AI Operational Restriction, AI Compliance Requirement.
- Context:
- It can typically enforce AI Behavioral Restrictions through hard limits and soft boundaryes.
- It can typically implement AI Safety Requirements via risk thresholds and protection mechanisms.
- It can typically ensure AI Regulatory Compliance through legal mandates and industry standards.
- It can typically maintain AI Ethical Alignment via value constraints and principle enforcement.
- It can typically control AI Resource Utilization through quota systems and allocation limits.
- ...
- It can often operate at Multiple Governance Levels including organizational, regulatory, and societal.
- It can often require Trade-off Resolution between competing objectives and stakeholder interests.
- It can often evolve through Policy Updates and regulatory changes.
- It can often enable Automated Enforcement via monitoring systems and control mechanisms.
- ...
- It can range from being a Soft AI Governance Constraint to being a Hard AI Governance Constraint, depending on its enforcement strictness.
- It can range from being a Static AI Governance Constraint to being a Adaptive AI Governance Constraint, depending on its modification capability.
- It can range from being a Local AI Governance Constraint to being a Global AI Governance Constraint, depending on its application scope.
- It can range from being a Simple AI Governance Constraint to being a Complex AI Governance Constraint, depending on its rule sophistication.
- ...
- It can integrate with AI Configuration Spaces for feasibility determination.
- It can interface with AI Monitoring Systems for compliance verification.
- It can connect to AI Control Systems for enforcement actions.
- It can communicate with AI Audit Frameworks for violation detection.
- ...
- Example(s):
- Safety AI Governance Constraints, such as:
- Human Harm Prevention Constraint, prohibiting actions causing physical injury or psychological damage.
- System Stability Constraint, preventing cascade failures and uncontrolled propagation.
- Legal AI Governance Constraints, such as:
- Data Privacy Constraint, enforcing GDPR compliance and user consent requirements.
- Financial Regulation Constraint, ensuring trading rules and fiduciary obligations.
- Ethical AI Governance Constraints, such as:
- Fairness Constraint, preventing discriminatory outcomes and bias amplification.
- Transparency Constraint, requiring explainable decisions and audit trails.
- Operational AI Governance Constraints, such as:
- Resource Usage Constraint, limiting computational consumption and API call rates.
- Scope Limitation Constraint, restricting operational domains and action types.
- ...
- Safety AI Governance Constraints, such as:
- Counter-Example(s):
- AI Performance Target, which defines desired outcomes rather than restrictions.
- AI Capability Dimension, which measures attributes rather than limits.
- AI Development Guideline, which suggests best practices rather than enforcement.
- See: AI Configuration Space, AI Development Strategy, Governance Framework, Compliance System, Policy Enforcement, Constraint Satisfaction, Risk Management.