Corporate Financial Modeling Task

From GM-RKB
Jump to navigation Jump to search

A Corporate Financial Modeling Task is a financial modeling task/ financial analysis task that models a corporation's financial forecasts.



References

2015

  • (Wikipedia, 2015) ⇒ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/financial_modeling#Accounting Retrieved:2015-7-13.
    • In corporate finance, investment banking, and the accounting profession financial modeling is largely synonymous with financial statement forecasting. This usually involves the preparation of detailed company specific models used for decision making purposes and financial analysis.

      Applications include:

    • To generalize as to the nature of these models: firstly, as they are built around financial statements, calculations and outputs are monthly, quarterly or annual; secondly, the inputs take the form of “assumptions”, where the analyst specifies the values that will apply in each period for external / global variables (exchange rates, tax percentage, etc…; may be thought of as the model parameters), and for internal / company specific variables (wages, unit costs, etc.…). Correspondingly, both characteristics are reflected (at least implicitly) in the mathematical form of these models: firstly, the models are in discrete time; secondly, they are deterministic. For discussion of the issues that may arise, see below; for discussion as to more sophisticated approaches sometimes employed, see Corporate finance# Quantifying uncertainty.

      Modelers are sometimes referred to (tongue in cheek) as "number crunchers", and are often designated “financial analyst”. Typically, the modeler will have completed an MBA or MSF with (optional) coursework in "financial modeling".Accounting qualifications and finance certifications such as the CIIA and CFA generally do not provide direct or explicit training in modeling. At the same time, numerous commercial training courses are offered, both through universities and privately.

      Although purpose built software does exist, the vast proportion of the market is spreadsheet-based; this is largely since the models are almost always company specific. Also, analysts will each have their own criteria and methods for financial modeling. [2] Microsoft Excel now has by far the dominant position, having overtaken Lotus 1-2-3 in the 1990s. Spreadsheet-based modelling can have its own problems, [3] and several standardizations and “best practices" have been proposed.[4] "Spreadsheet risk" is increasingly studied and managed.[4] One critique here, is that model outputs, i.e. line items, often incorporate “unrealistic implicit assumptions” and “internal inconsistencies”. (For example, a forecast for growth in revenue but without corresponding increases in working capital, fixed assets and the associated financing, may imbed unrealistic assumptions about asset turnover, leverage and / or equity financing.) What is required, but often lacking, is that all key elements are explicitly and consistently forecasted. Related to this, is that modellers often additionally "fail to identify crucial assumptions" relating to inputs, "and to explore what can go wrong". Here, in general, modellers "use point values and simple arithmetic instead of probability distributions and statistical measures" [5] — i.e., as mentioned, the problems are treated as deterministic in nature — and thus calculate a single value for the asset or project, but without providing information on the range, variance and sensitivity of outcomes. [6] Other critiques discuss the lack of adequate spreadsheet design skills, [7] and of basic computer programming concepts. [8] More serious criticism, in fact, relates to the nature of budgeting itself, and its impact on the organization. [9] [10] The Financial Modeling World Championships, known as ModelOff, have been held since 2012. ModelOff is a global online financial modeling competition which culminates in a Live Finals Event for top competitors. From 2012-2014 the Live Finals were held in New York City and in 2015 they will be held in London.

  1. §39 "Corporate Planning Models". See also, §294 "Simulation Model".
  2. See for example, Valuing Companies by Cash Flow Discounting: Ten Methods and Nine Theories, Pablo Fernandez: University of Navarra - IESE Business School
  3. Danielle Stein Fairhurst (2009). Six reasons your spreadsheet is NOT a financial model, fimodo.com
  4. 4.0 4.1 Best Practice, European Spreadsheet Risks Interest Group
  5. Peter Coffee (2004). Spreadsheets: 25 Years in a Cell, eWeek.
  6. http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/pdfiles/papers/probabilistic.pdf
  7. http://www.cluteinstitute.com/Programs/Las_Vegas_2009/Article%20323.pdf
  8. Blayney, P. (2009). Knowledge Gap? Accounting Practitioners Lacking Computer Programming Concepts as Essential Knowledge. In G. Siemens & C. Fulford (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2009 (pp. 151-159). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
  9. Loren Gary (2003). Why Budgeting Kills Your Company, Harvard Management Update, May 2003.
  10. Michael Jensen (2001). Corporate Budgeting Is Broken, Let's Fix It, Harvard Business Review, pp. 94-101, November 2001.