Evaluation Resolution Process
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
An Evaluation Resolution Process is a resolution process that resolves disagreements among evaluators through systematic procedures to achieve consensus decisions.
- AKA: Disagreement Resolution Process, Evaluation Adjudication Process, Consensus Building Process, Annotation Conflict Resolution.
- Context:
- It can typically employ Resolution Protocols with clear guidelines.
- It can typically produce Final Annotations from conflicting judgments.
- It can often involve Iterative Discussions among participants.
- It can often document Resolution Rationales for transparency.
- It can support Quality Assurance in annotation projects.
- It can minimize Annotation Bias through structured approaches.
- It can generate Agreement Statistics post-resolution.
- It can integrate with Annotation Platforms for workflow management.
- It can range from being a Binary Resolution Process to being a Multi-Class Resolution Process, depending on its label complexity.
- It can range from being a Automated Resolution Process to being a Manual Resolution Process, depending on its automation level.
- It can range from being a Majority-Vote Resolution Process to being a Deliberative Resolution Process, depending on its decision mechanism.
- It can range from being a Single-Stage Resolution Process to being a Multi-Stage Resolution Process, depending on its process depth.
- ...
- Examples:
- Expert-Based Resolution Processes, such as:
- Automated Resolution Processes, such as:
- Hybrid Resolution Processes, such as:
- Tiered Resolution Process combining automation and human review.
- ...
- Counter-Examples:
- Initial Annotation Process, which precedes disagreement.
- Independent Evaluation, which avoids consensus requirement.
- Single-Annotator Process, which has no conflict.
- See: Evaluation Process, Expert Adjudication Process, Inter-Annotator Agreement, Annotation Guidelines, Consensus Method, Quality Control Process, Disagreement Analysis.