FAVES AI Ethics Framework
(Redirected from Fair-Appropriate-Valid-Effective-Safe Framework)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
A FAVES AI Ethics Framework is a healthcare-focused principle-based responsible ai governance framework that can support ethical ai deployment tasks.
- AKA: Fair-Appropriate-Valid-Effective-Safe Framework, FAVES Principles, FAVES AI Guidelines.
- Context:
- It can (typically) ensure AI Fairness through bias detection mechanisms.
- It can (typically) verify AI Appropriateness via use case evaluations.
- It can (typically) establish AI Validity using validation methodologys.
- It can (typically) measure AI Effectiveness through outcome assessments.
- It can (typically) guarantee AI Safety via risk mitigation protocols.
- ...
- It can (often) guide Healthcare AI Development through ethical design principles.
- It can (often) inform AI Governance Policy via structured frameworks.
- It can (often) support AI Audit Processes using assessment criteria.
- It can (often) facilitate Stakeholder Communication through shared vocabulary.
- ...
- It can range from being a High-Level FAVES AI Ethics Framework to being a Detailed FAVES AI Ethics Framework, depending on its implementation specificity.
- It can range from being a Domain-Specific FAVES AI Ethics Framework to being a General-Purpose FAVES AI Ethics Framework, depending on its application scope.
- ...
- It can incorporate Fairness Metrics for bias quantification.
- It can define Appropriateness Criteria for use case selection.
- It can establish Validity Thresholds for model acceptance.
- It can specify Effectiveness Indicators for performance monitoring.
- It can implement Safety Guardrails for risk prevention.
- ...
- It can be Healthcare Industry Adopted demonstrating sector relevance.
- It can be Regulatory Aligned supporting compliance requirements.
- It can be Stakeholder Endorsed indicating broad acceptance.
- ...
- Examples:
- Counter-Examples:
- Generic AI Ethics Principles, which lack healthcare-specific considerations.
- Technical-Only AI Guidelines, which miss ethical dimensions.
- Post-Hoc Ethics Review, which lacks proactive governance.
- See: AI Ethics, Responsible AI, Healthcare AI Governance, AI Bias Mitigation, AI Safety Framework, Ethical AI Development, AI Accountability, Healthcare Technology Ethics, AI Risk Management, Trustworthy AI.