Jurisdiction Mapping Ontology
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
A Jurisdiction Mapping Ontology is a legal-domain ontology that models jurisdictional relationships between geographic regions, governmental levels, and legal authority for jurisdiction-aware legal systems.
- AKA: Legal Jurisdiction Ontology, Geographic Legal Authority Ontology, Jurisdictional Hierarchy Ontology.
- Context:
- It can typically define Federal-State Relationships in federal systems.
- It can typically map Geographic Boundarys to legal jurisdictions.
- It can typically represent Court Jurisdictions across judicial districts.
- It can often model Overlapping Authority between concurrent jurisdictions.
- It can often encode Choice of Law Rules for conflict resolution.
- It can range from being a National Jurisdiction Ontology to being an International Jurisdiction Ontology, depending on its geographic scope.
- It can range from being a Hierarchical Jurisdiction Ontology to being a Network Jurisdiction Ontology, depending on its structural pattern.
- It can range from being a Static Jurisdiction Ontology to being a Dynamic Jurisdiction Ontology, depending on its boundary flexibility.
- It can range from being a Simple Jurisdiction Ontology to being a Complex Jurisdiction Ontology, depending on its relationship density.
- ...
- Examples:
- Federal System Jurisdiction Ontologys, such as:
- Court System Jurisdiction Ontologys, such as:
- International Jurisdiction Ontologys, such as:
- ...
- Counter-Examples:
- Geographic Information Ontology, which lacks legal authority relationships.
- Political Boundary Database, which omits jurisdictional hierarchy.
- Administrative Division System, which focuses on governance structure rather than legal authority.
- See: Legal-Domain Ontology, Jurisdiction-Scoped Legal Search Task, Legal Authority Hierarchy Framework, Conflict of Laws Analysis System, Legal Knowledge Graph, Legal Query Template System, Primary Legal Source Retrieval Task, Legal Information System.