Matthews Correlation Coefficient
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
A Matthews Correlation Coefficient is a binary-specific balanced correlation coefficient that can quantify classification agreement between observed classification outcomes and predicted classification outcomes for binary classification tasks.
- AKA: MCC, Matthews Correlation Coefficient, Phi Coefficient.
- Context:
- It can typically compute Correlation Coefficient Values from confusion matrix elements through matthews correlation coefficient formulas.
- It can typically handle Imbalanced Dataset Classification Tasks through balanced correlation measurements.
- It can typically produce Normalized Correlation Values between negative one values and positive one values through correlation coefficient normalizations.
- It can typically assess Binary Classification Quality through true positive rates, true negative rates, false positive rates, and false negative rates.
- It can typically provide Single Scalar Performance Values for model comparison tasks through correlation coefficient aggregations.
- ...
- It can often evaluate Biological Sequence Prediction Tasks through sequence alignment correlations.
- It can often detect Random Classification Patterns through zero correlation values.
- It can often identify Perfect Classification Agreement through positive one correlation values.
- It can often reveal Complete Classification Disagreement through negative one correlation values.
- ...
- It can range from being a Simple Matthews Correlation Coefficient Measure to being a Complex Matthews Correlation Coefficient Measure, depending on its matthews correlation coefficient computational complexity.
- It can range from being a Binary Matthews Correlation Coefficient Measure to being a Multi-Class Matthews Correlation Coefficient Measure, depending on its matthews correlation coefficient classification scope.
- It can range from being a Standard Matthews Correlation Coefficient Measure to being a Weighted Matthews Correlation Coefficient Measure, depending on its matthews correlation coefficient class weighting.
- It can range from being a Single-Label Matthews Correlation Coefficient Measure to being a Multi-Label Matthews Correlation Coefficient Measure, depending on its matthews correlation coefficient label handling.
- ...
- It can integrate with Machine Learning Frameworks for model evaluation tasks.
- It can complement F-Score Measures for comprehensive performance assessments.
- It can substitute Accuracy Measures in imbalanced dataset scenarios.
- It can combine with ROC-AUC Measures for multi-metric evaluations.
- It can support Cross-Validation Processes through fold-wise correlation computations.
- ...
- Example(s):
- Counter-Example(s):
- Accuracy Measure, which lacks class imbalance handling unlike matthews correlation coefficient measures.
- Precision Measure, which focuses on positive predictive value rather than correlation-based agreement.
- Recall Measure, which emphasizes true positive rate without considering true negative performance.
- F1-Score Measure, which uses harmonic mean rather than correlation coefficient.
- Mean Squared Error, which applies to regression tasks rather than classification tasks.
- See: Correlation Coefficient, Binary Classification Performance Measure, Classification Performance Measure, Phi Coefficient, Cohen's Kappa Statistic, Confusion Matrix, Imbalanced Dataset Classification, Balanced Accuracy Measure, Chance-Corrected Measure.