Model Faithfulness Measure

A Model Faithfulness Measure is an AI Model Evaluation Metric that is a measure of alignment between model faithfulness reported reasoning and model faithfulness actual internal processes.

• AKA: AI Faithfulness Metric, Reasoning Alignment Measure, Explanation Fidelity Measure, Process Transparency Metric.
• Context:
  • It can typically assess Model Faithfulness Consistency between model faithfulness explanations and model faithfulness computations.
  • It can typically detect Model Faithfulness Discrepancys when model faithfulness stated reasons differ from model faithfulness true processes.
  • It can typically evaluate Model Faithfulness Completeness of model faithfulness self-reported reasoning.
  • It can typically measure Model Faithfulness Causality linking model faithfulness explanations to model faithfulness decisions.
  • It can typically quantify Model Faithfulness Reliability across model faithfulness different inputs.
  • ...
  • It can often reveal Model Faithfulness Post-Hoc Rationalization creating model faithfulness plausible explanations after decision making.
  • It can often identify Model Faithfulness Confabulation generating model faithfulness false reasoning traces.
  • It can often expose Model Faithfulness Deception providing model faithfulness misleading explanations.
  • It can often uncover Model Faithfulness Simplification omitting model faithfulness complex processes.
  • ...
  • It can range from being a Binary Model Faithfulness Measure to being a Continuous Model Faithfulness Measure, depending on its model faithfulness scoring granularity.
  • It can range from being a Local Model Faithfulness Measure to being a Global Model Faithfulness Measure, depending on its model faithfulness evaluation scope.
  • It can range from being a Automated Model Faithfulness Measure to being a Human-Evaluated Model Faithfulness Measure, depending on its model faithfulness assessment method.
  • It can range from being a Task-Specific Model Faithfulness Measure to being a General Model Faithfulness Measure, depending on its model faithfulness application domain.
  • ...
  • It can be computed using Causal Intervention Methods testing model faithfulness explanation impacts.
  • It can be validated through Counterfactual Analysis examining model faithfulness alternative reasoning.
  • It can be enhanced by AI Interpretability Techniques revealing model faithfulness internal states.
  • It can be applied in Model Evaluation Frameworks assessing model faithfulness trustworthiness.
  • It can be integrated with AI Safety Assessments ensuring model faithfulness reliable behavior.
  • ...
• Example(s):
  • Chain-of-Thought Model Faithfulness Measures evaluating whether model faithfulness reasoning steps actually influence final answers.
  • Mathematical Model Faithfulness Measures checking if model faithfulness shown calculations match internal computations.
  • Feature Attribution Model Faithfulness Measures verifying model faithfulness claimed importances align with actual gradients.
  • Decision Tree Model Faithfulness Measures confirming model faithfulness stated rules reflect true decision paths.
  • Attention-Based Model Faithfulness Measures testing if model faithfulness highlighted tokens genuinely affect predictions.
  • ...
• Counter-Example(s):
  • Performance Accuracy Metrics, which measure correctness without reasoning transparency.
  • Output Quality Measures, which evaluate results without process understanding.
  • User Satisfaction Scores, which assess preferences without faithfulness verification.
• See: AI Alignment Measure, AI Interpretability Technique, Explainable AI (XAI) System, Chain-of-Thought Prompting, Causal Attribution Method, AI Safety Assessment, Model Transparency.

---