Model Human Evaluation Measure
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
A Model Human Evaluation Measure is a model evaluation measure that is a subjective model assessment metric designed to capture human judgment of model output quality through human model annotation.
- AKA: Model Human Assessment Metric, Manual Model Evaluation Measure, Human Model Judgment Score.
- Context:
- It can typically assess Model Output Quality through holistic model ratings and preference judgments.
- It can typically measure Model Fluency using readability assessments and naturalness scores.
- It can typically evaluate Model Adequacy via content coverage and information completeness.
- It can typically quantify Model Coherence through logical flow ratings and consistency checks.
- It can typically determine Model Relevance using task appropriateness and context alignment.
- ...
- It can often employ Likert Scale Model Ratings for graded model assessment.
- It can often utilize Pairwise Model Comparisons for relative model evaluation.
- It can often implement Model Error Annotation for detailed model analysis.
- It can often leverage Crowd Sourcing for scalable model evaluation.
- ...
- It can range from being a Binary Model Human Evaluation Measure to being a Multi-Scale Model Human Evaluation Measure, depending on its rating granularity.
- It can range from being a Single-Annotator Model Human Evaluation Measure to being a Multi-Annotator Model Human Evaluation Measure, depending on its annotator count.
- It can range from being an Expert Model Human Evaluation Measure to being a Crowdsourced Model Human Evaluation Measure, depending on its annotator expertise.
- It can range from being a Direct Model Human Evaluation Measure to being an Indirect Model Human Evaluation Measure, depending on its assessment method.
- It can range from being a Task-Specific Model Human Evaluation Measure to being a General Model Human Evaluation Measure, depending on its application scope.
- ...
- It can support Model Development through quality feedback.
- It can enable Model Comparison via human preference.
- It can facilitate Model Error Analysis through detailed annotation.
- It can guide Model Improvement via weakness identification.
- It can inform Model Deployment Decisions through acceptance testing.
- ...
- Example(s):
- Rating-Based Model Human Evaluation Measures, such as:
- Comparison-Based Model Human Evaluation Measures, such as:
- Pairwise Model Preference Score comparing model outputs.
- Best-Worst Model Scaling ranking multiple model options.
- Model Ranking Evaluation ordering model performance.
- A/B Model Testing Score measuring model preference.
- Annotation-Based Model Human Evaluation Measures, such as:
- Model Error Count Metric tallying model mistakes and model flaws.
- Model Adequacy-Fluency Score rating translation model quality.
- Model Grammaticality Judgment assessing linguistic model correctness.
- Model Factuality Annotation verifying model content accuracy.
- Agreement-Based Model Human Evaluation Measures, such as:
- ...
- Counter-Example(s):
- System Human Evaluation Measures, which assess complete systems rather than model outputs.
- Automatic Model Evaluation Metrics, which use algorithmic computation rather than human judgment.
- Objective Model Performance Measures, which measure quantifiable outcomes rather than subjective quality.
- See: Model Evaluation Task, Inter-Annotator Agreement, Human Evaluation Task, Crowdsourcing, Subjective Assessment, Model User Study, Model Quality Assessment.