NLG Model Evaluation Measure
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
An NLG Model Evaluation Measure is a model evaluation measure that is a language generation model metric designed to assess nlg model quality through generation quality metrics.
- AKA: Natural Language Generation Model Metric, Text Generation Model Evaluation Measure, NLG Model Performance Metric.
- Context:
- It can typically measure NLG Model Fluency through language model probabilitys and perplexity scores.
- It can typically assess NLG Model Semantic Similarity using embedding-based metrics and contextual representations.
- It can typically evaluate NLG Model Content Overlap via n-gram matching and subsequence comparison.
- It can typically quantify NLG Model Factual Accuracy through knowledge verification and source alignment.
- It can typically determine NLG Model Coherence using discourse metrics and cohesion scores.
- ...
- It can often compare Generated Model Output against reference texts using similarity metrics.
- It can often incorporate Human Judgment Correlation through model calibration studys.
- It can often handle Multiple References via aggregation methods.
- It can often support Domain-Specific Model Evaluation through specialized metrics.
- ...
- It can range from being a Reference-Based NLG Model Evaluation Measure to being a Reference-Free NLG Model Evaluation Measure, depending on its reference requirement.
- It can range from being a Lexical NLG Model Evaluation Measure to being a Semantic NLG Model Evaluation Measure, depending on its analysis level.
- It can range from being a Single-Aspect NLG Model Evaluation Measure to being a Multi-Aspect NLG Model Evaluation Measure, depending on its evaluation scope.
- It can range from being a Task-Specific NLG Model Evaluation Measure to being a General NLG Model Evaluation Measure, depending on its application domain.
- It can range from being a Traditional NLG Model Evaluation Measure to being a Neural NLG Model Evaluation Measure, depending on its computation method.
- ...
- It can support NLG Model Development through performance benchmarking.
- It can enable NLG Model Comparison via standardized scoring.
- It can facilitate NLG Model Quality Control through threshold setting.
- It can guide NLG Model Optimization via metric feedback.
- It can inform NLG Model Deployment Decisions through quality assessment.
- ...
- Example(s):
- N-gram Based NLG Model Evaluation Measures, such as:
- BLEU Score measuring translation model quality through n-gram precision.
- ROUGE Metric evaluating summarization model quality via recall-oriented measures.
- METEOR Score incorporating synonym matching and stem alignment.
- CIDEr Metric assessing image captioning model through consensus measurement.
- Embedding-Based NLG Model Evaluation Measures, such as:
- BERTScore Evaluation Metric using contextual embeddings for model similarity assessment.
- MoverScore leveraging word mover distance for model semantic comparison.
- BLEURT Metric combining BERT representations with learned scoring.
- Model-Based NLG Model Evaluation Measures, such as:
- Perplexity Measure evaluating language model fit.
- COMET Score using trained evaluation models.
- BARTScore employing generative model likelihood.
- Factuality NLG Model Evaluation Measures, such as:
- FactCC Score checking model factual consistency.
- DAE Metric detecting dependency arc entailment.
- QAGS Score using question-answering for model faithfulness evaluation.
- ...
- N-gram Based NLG Model Evaluation Measures, such as:
- Counter-Example(s):
- NLG-based System Evaluation Measures, which assess complete nlg applications rather than nlg models.
- NLU Model Evaluation Measures, which assess comprehension models rather than generation models.
- Classification Model Metrics, which measure category prediction rather than text generation quality.
- See: Natural Language Generation (NLG) Performance Measure, Model Evaluation Measure, ROUGE Metric, BERTScore Evaluation Metric, Text Generation Model, NLG Model, Language Model Evaluation.