Populist Nationalistic Ideology
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
A Populist Nationalistic Ideology is a nationalistic ideology that is a populist ideology.
- Context:
- It can emphasize the use of confrontation and polarisation.
- It can involve aggressive language where opponents are branded as enemies or traitors.
- It can be critical of journalism.
- It can emphasize strengthening executive power.
- …
- Example(s):
- American Populist Nationalism, as practiced by Donald Trump.
- Latin American Populist Nationalism, as practiced by Argentina’s Juan Perón to Venezuela’s Hugo Chávez.
- …
- Counter-Example(s):
- See: Fascism.
References
2017
- http://www.economist.com/news/americas/21717105-donald-trump-through-latin-american-eyes-peronist-potomac
- QUOTE: A PRESIDENT is swept into office after whipping up a wave of grievance and resentment. He claims to represent “the people” against internal exploiters and external threats. He purports to “refound” the nation, and damns those who preceded him. He governs though confrontation and polarisation. His language is aggressive — opponents are branded as enemies or traitors. He uses the media to cement his connection with the masses, while bridling at critical journalism and at rebuffs to executive power. His policies focus on bringing short-term benefits to his political base — hang the long-term cost to the country’s economic stability.
Donald Trump? Yes, but these traits come straight from the manual of Latin American populist nationalism, a tradition that stretches from Argentina’s Juan Perón to Venezuela’s Hugo Chávez and beyond. Yes, Mr Trump is a billionaire capitalist whereas Chávez was an anti-capitalist army officer. But populism is not synonymous with the left: conservatives such as Peru’s Alberto Fujimori used its techniques, too.
- QUOTE: A PRESIDENT is swept into office after whipping up a wave of grievance and resentment. He claims to represent “the people” against internal exploiters and external threats. He purports to “refound” the nation, and damns those who preceded him. He governs though confrontation and polarisation. His language is aggressive — opponents are branded as enemies or traitors. He uses the media to cement his connection with the masses, while bridling at critical journalism and at rebuffs to executive power. His policies focus on bringing short-term benefits to his political base — hang the long-term cost to the country’s economic stability.