Trust-But-Verify AI Approach
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
A Trust-But-Verify AI Approach is an AI Governance Approach that is a Human-AI Collaboration Framework that can support validated AI decision-making tasks.
- AKA: AI Verification Framework, Human-Validated AI Method, Supervised AI Automation Approach.
- Context:
- It can typically require Human Expert Validation of AI-generated recommendations before business action execution.
- It can typically establish Confidence Thresholds for automated decisions through risk-based assessment.
- It can typically implement Audit Trail Mechanisms for AI decision history via validation logging.
- It can typically enable Override Protocols for AI recommendations using human judgment priority.
- It can typically maintain Performance Feedback Loops between human validators and AI systems through continuous learning.
- ...
- It can often provide Explanation Interfaces for AI reasoning processes via interpretability features.
- It can often support Selective Automation of low-risk decisions through risk stratification.
- It can often enable Batch Review Modes for high-volume validation using efficient review workflows.
- It can often implement Escalation Pathways for complex cases through tiered review structure.
- ...
- It can range from being a Minimal Trust-But-Verify AI Approach to being a Comprehensive Trust-But-Verify AI Approach, depending on its verification requirement stringency.
- It can range from being a Synchronous Trust-But-Verify AI Approach to being an Asynchronous Trust-But-Verify AI Approach, depending on its validation timing model.
- It can range from being a Single-Reviewer Trust-But-Verify AI Approach to being a Multi-Reviewer Trust-But-Verify AI Approach, depending on its validation team structure.
- ...
- It can integrate with AI Contract Metadata Extraction Systems for contract data validation.
- It can connect to Compliance Management Systems for regulatory requirement enforcement.
- It can interface with Quality Assurance Platforms for validation metric tracking.
- It can synchronize with Training Data Repositorys for model improvement feedback.
- It can communicate with Risk Management Systems for risk-based review prioritization.
- ...
- Example(s):
- Domain-Specific Trust-But-Verify Implementations, such as:
- Legal Contract Trust-But-Verify System requiring attorney validation of AI-extracted contract terms before obligation commitment.
- Medical Diagnosis Trust-But-Verify System mandating physician review of AI diagnostic suggestions before treatment decision.
- Financial Trading Trust-But-Verify System enforcing trader approval of AI trading recommendations before order execution.
- Regulatory Compliance Trust-But-Verify System requiring compliance officer review of AI risk assessments before regulatory filing.
- Verification Depth Levels, such as:
- Spot-Check Verification Mode for routine low-stakes decisions with random sampling validation.
- Threshold-Based Verification Mode for medium-risk decisions exceeding defined confidence limits.
- Full Manual Verification Mode for high-stakes decisions requiring complete human review.
- Dual-Review Verification Mode for critical decisions needing multiple validator consensus.
- Industry Applications, such as:
- ...
- Domain-Specific Trust-But-Verify Implementations, such as:
- Counter-Example(s):
- Fully Autonomous AI System, which executes AI decisions without human validation requirement.
- Manual Override System, which allows human intervention but doesn't require systematic verification.
- Post-Hoc AI Audit System, which reviews AI decisions after execution rather than requiring pre-execution validation.
- See: AI Governance Approach, Human-AI Collaboration Framework, AI Contract Metadata Extraction System, AI Validation Protocol, Human-in-the-Loop System, AI Risk Management Framework.