Declarative Prompt-Programming Framework: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A [[Declarative Prompt-Programming Framework]] is a [[prompt-programming framework]] that uses a [[declarative syntax]] to express the structure, inputs, outputs, and constraints of [[LLM interaction]]s while hiding implementation details. | A [[Declarative Prompt-Programming Framework]] is a [[prompt-programming framework]] that uses a [[declarative syntax]] to express the structure, inputs, outputs, and constraints of [[LLM interaction]]s while hiding implementation details. | ||
* <B>Context:</B> | * <B>Context:</B> | ||
** It can typically represent [[Prompt Design]] as [[data]] rather than [[code]], allowing for more | ** It can typically represent [[Prompt Design]] as [[structured data]] rather than [[imperative code]], allowing for more systematic and maintainable [[prompt management]]. | ||
** It can typically use [[Declarative Syntax]] (such as [[YAML]], [[JSON]], or [[custom DSL]]s) to express what the [[LLM interaction]] should | ** It can typically use [[Declarative Syntax]] (such as [[YAML]], [[JSON]], or [[custom DSL]]s) to express what the [[LLM interaction]] should accomplish without specifying how it is executed. | ||
** It can typically provide [[Prompt Specification]] documents that are parsed and executed by a [[runtime interpreter]]. | ** It can typically provide [[Prompt Specification]] documents that are parsed and executed by a [[runtime interpreter]]. | ||
** It can typically support [[Schema Validation]] for both [[input]] and [[output]] to reduce [[prompt failure]]s. | ** It can typically support [[Schema Validation]] for both [[input]] and [[output]] to reduce [[prompt failure]]s and ensure [[data consistency]]. | ||
** It can typically enable [[Modular Reuse]] through [[import]] and [[include]] | ** It can typically enable [[Modular Reuse]] through [[import mechanism]]s and [[include directive]]s for [[prompt component]]s. | ||
** It can typically abstract [[Model-Specific Detail]]s, creating a [[model-agnostic representation]] of [[declarative prompt-programming intention]]s. | |||
** It can typically support [[Version Control]] integration due to its [[text-based representation]]. | |||
** ... | ** ... | ||
** It can often include [[Templating Directive]]s (using systems like [[Jinja2]] or [[Liquid]]) for [[dynamic | ** It can often include [[Templating Directive]]s (using systems like [[Jinja2]] or [[Liquid]]) for [[dynamic content generation]]. | ||
** It can often implement [[Control Flow Construct]]s such as [[loop]]s, [[conditional]]s, and [[function definition]]s. | ** It can often implement [[Control Flow Construct]]s such as [[declarative prompt-programming loop]]s, [[declarative prompt-programming conditional]]s, and [[declarative prompt-programming function definition]]s. | ||
** It can often support [[ | ** It can often provide [[Type Checking]] for [[declarative prompt-programming variable]]s to ensure [[data integrity]]. | ||
** It can often support [[Model Chaining]] to create [[multi-step declarative prompt-programming workflow]]s. | |||
** It can often enable [[Collaborative Prompt Development]] through its [[human-readable format]] and [[defined structure]]. | |||
** It can often facilitate [[Prompt Versioning]] to track [[declarative prompt-programming evolution]]. | |||
** ... | ** ... | ||
** It can range from being a [[Simple Declarative Prompt-Programming Framework]] to being a [[Complex Declarative Prompt-Programming Framework]], depending on its [[declarative prompt-programming feature | ** It can range from being a [[Simple Declarative Prompt-Programming Framework]] to being a [[Complex Declarative Prompt-Programming Framework]], depending on its [[declarative prompt-programming feature complexity]]. | ||
** It can range from being a [[Domain-Specific Declarative Prompt-Programming Framework]] to being a [[General-Purpose Declarative Prompt-Programming Framework]], depending on its [[declarative prompt-programming application scope]]. | ** It can range from being a [[Domain-Specific Declarative Prompt-Programming Framework]] to being a [[General-Purpose Declarative Prompt-Programming Framework]], depending on its [[declarative prompt-programming application scope]]. | ||
** It can range from being a [[Lightweight Declarative Prompt-Programming Framework]] to being a [[Comprehensive Declarative Prompt-Programming Framework]], depending on its [[declarative prompt-programming integration capability]]. | |||
** It can range from being a [[Specialized Declarative Prompt-Programming Framework]] to being a [[Universal Declarative Prompt-Programming Framework]], depending on its [[declarative prompt-programming model compatibility]]. | |||
** ... | ** ... | ||
** It can integrate with [[Retrieval-Augmented Generation Pipeline]]s for [[structured document processing]]. | ** It can integrate with [[Retrieval-Augmented Generation Pipeline]]s for [[structured document processing]]. | ||
** It can connect to [[LLM API]] for [[standardized model interaction]]. | ** It can connect to [[LLM API]] for [[standardized model interaction]]. | ||
** It can support [[Agent Orchestration System]]s for [[multi-step workflow management]]. | ** It can support [[Agent Orchestration System]]s for [[multi-step workflow management]]. | ||
** It can interface with [[Version Control System]]s for [[declarative prompt-programming history tracking]]. | |||
** It can incorporate [[External Knowledge Source]]s via [[declarative prompt-programming retrieval mechanism]]s. | |||
** It can work with [[Validation Tool]]s for [[declarative prompt-programming quality assurance]]. | |||
** ... | ** ... | ||
* <B>Examples:</B> | * <B>Examples:</B> | ||
** [[Declarative Prompt-Programming Framework Implementation]]s, such as: | ** [[Declarative Prompt-Programming Framework Implementation]]s, such as: | ||
*** [[YAML-Based Declarative Prompt-Programming Framework]]s, such as: | *** [[YAML-Based Declarative Prompt-Programming Framework]]s, such as: | ||
**** [[PDL (Prompt Declaration Language)]] using [[YAML]] with [[Jinja2]] for [[templating function]]s. | **** [[IBM PDL (Prompt Declaration Language)]] using [[YAML]] with [[Jinja2]] for [[templating function]]s and [[type checking]] via [[JSON Schema]]. | ||
**** [[PromptLang]] developed by [[Netflix]] for [[content recommendation prompt system]]s. | **** [[PromptLang]] developed by [[Netflix]] for [[content recommendation prompt system]]s. | ||
**** [[Pathway Templates]] for [[declarative prompt-programming structured workflow]]s. | |||
*** [[JSON-Based Declarative Prompt-Programming Framework]]s, such as: | *** [[JSON-Based Declarative Prompt-Programming Framework]]s, such as: | ||
**** [[OpenAI Prompt JSON]] for [[structured dialogue system]]s. | **** [[OpenAI Prompt JSON]] for [[structured dialogue system]]s. | ||
**** [[Prompt Schema]] for [[declarative prompt-programming standardization]]. | |||
*** [[DSL-Based Declarative Prompt-Programming Framework]]s, such as: | |||
**** [[Impromptu]] for [[model-driven declarative prompt-programming]] with [[platform independence]]. | |||
**** [[Questo]] for [[declarative query generation]]. | |||
** [[Declarative Prompt-Programming Framework Application Domain]]s, such as: | ** [[Declarative Prompt-Programming Framework Application Domain]]s, such as: | ||
*** [[Controlled Chatbot Declarative Prompt-Programming Framework]]s for [[regulated conversation flow]]. | *** [[Controlled Chatbot Declarative Prompt-Programming Framework]]s for [[regulated conversation flow]]. | ||
*** [[RAG Pipeline Declarative Prompt-Programming Framework]]s for [[document retrieval workflow]]. | *** [[RAG Pipeline Declarative Prompt-Programming Framework]]s for [[document retrieval workflow]]. | ||
*** [[Regulated Domain Declarative Prompt-Programming Framework]]s for [[finance]] and [[legal]] applications requiring [[auditability]]. | *** [[Regulated Domain Declarative Prompt-Programming Framework]]s for [[finance]] and [[legal]] applications requiring [[auditability]]. | ||
*** [[Code Generation Declarative Prompt-Programming Framework]]s for [[structured programming task]]s. | |||
*** [[Chain-of-Thought Declarative Prompt-Programming Framework]]s for [[multi-step reasoning process]]es. | |||
*** [[ReAct Agent Declarative Prompt-Programming Framework]]s for [[reasoning and acting cycle]]s. | |||
** [[Declarative Prompt-Programming Framework Capability Implementation]]s, such as: | |||
*** [[Templating Integration Declarative Prompt-Programming Framework]]s, such as: | |||
**** [[Jinja2-Powered Declarative Prompt-Programming Framework]]s for [[dynamic text substitution]]. | |||
**** [[Liquid-Based Declarative Prompt-Programming Framework]]s for [[conditional content inclusion]]. | |||
*** [[Control Flow Declarative Prompt-Programming Framework]]s, such as: | |||
**** [[Conditional Logic Declarative Prompt-Programming Framework]]s for [[branching prompt path]]s. | |||
**** [[Loop-Enabled Declarative Prompt-Programming Framework]]s for [[iterative prompt processing]]. | |||
** ... | ** ... | ||
* <B>Counter-Examples:</B> | * <B>Counter-Examples:</B> | ||
** [[Prompt-Optimization Framework]]s, such as [[DSPy]] and [[TextGrad]], which focus on [[prompt tuning]] and [[automation]] rather than [[declarative structure]]. | ** [[Prompt-Optimization Framework]]s, such as [[DSPy]] and [[TextGrad]], which focus on [[prompt tuning]] and [[automation]] rather than [[declarative structure]] and [[human readability]]. | ||
** [[Imperative Prompt-Programming Framework]]s, which use [[procedural code]] to directly define the [[execution flow]] of [[LLM interaction]]s. | ** [[Imperative Prompt-Programming Framework]]s, which use [[procedural code]] to directly define the [[execution flow]] of [[LLM interaction]]s with emphasis on [[how]] rather than [[what]]. | ||
** [[Ad-hoc Prompt Design Approach]]es, which lack [[formal structure]] and [[schema validation]]. | ** [[Ad-hoc Prompt Design Approach]]es, which lack [[formal structure]], [[schema validation]], and [[reusable component]]s that characterize [[declarative prompt-programming framework]]s. | ||
* <B>See:</B> [[Prompt Engineering]], [[LLM Orchestration Framework]], [[Declarative Programming]], [[YAML Configuration]], [[JSON Schema]]. | ** [[Template-Only System]]s, which provide basic [[text substitution]] without the full [[declarative prompt-programming capabilities]] like [[schema validation]] and [[control flow]]. | ||
** [[Model-Specific Framework]]s that tightly couple [[prompt design]] to [[specific LLM implementation]]s, lacking the [[model-agnostic abstraction]] of [[declarative prompt-programming framework]]s. | |||
* <B>See:</B> [[Prompt Engineering]], [[LLM Orchestration Framework]], [[Declarative Programming]], [[YAML Configuration]], [[JSON Schema]], [[Domain-Specific Language]], [[Model-Driven Engineering]], [[Structured Output Generation]], [[Retrieval-Augmented Generation]], [[Chain-of-Thought Prompting]]. | |||
---- | ---- | ||
Line 40: | Line 67: | ||
[[Category:Concept]] | [[Category:Concept]] | ||
[[Category:AI Technology]] | [[Category:AI Technology]] | ||
[[Category:Quality | [[Category:Prompt Engineering]] | ||
[[Category:Quality Gold]] |
Revision as of 19:49, 1 May 2025
A Declarative Prompt-Programming Framework is a prompt-programming framework that uses a declarative syntax to express the structure, inputs, outputs, and constraints of LLM interactions while hiding implementation details.
- Context:
- It can typically represent Prompt Design as structured data rather than imperative code, allowing for more systematic and maintainable prompt management.
- It can typically use Declarative Syntax (such as YAML, JSON, or custom DSLs) to express what the LLM interaction should accomplish without specifying how it is executed.
- It can typically provide Prompt Specification documents that are parsed and executed by a runtime interpreter.
- It can typically support Schema Validation for both input and output to reduce prompt failures and ensure data consistency.
- It can typically enable Modular Reuse through import mechanisms and include directives for prompt components.
- It can typically abstract Model-Specific Details, creating a model-agnostic representation of declarative prompt-programming intentions.
- It can typically support Version Control integration due to its text-based representation.
- ...
- It can often include Templating Directives (using systems like Jinja2 or Liquid) for dynamic content generation.
- It can often implement Control Flow Constructs such as declarative prompt-programming loops, declarative prompt-programming conditionals, and declarative prompt-programming function definitions.
- It can often provide Type Checking for declarative prompt-programming variables to ensure data integrity.
- It can often support Model Chaining to create multi-step declarative prompt-programming workflows.
- It can often enable Collaborative Prompt Development through its human-readable format and defined structure.
- It can often facilitate Prompt Versioning to track declarative prompt-programming evolution.
- ...
- It can range from being a Simple Declarative Prompt-Programming Framework to being a Complex Declarative Prompt-Programming Framework, depending on its declarative prompt-programming feature complexity.
- It can range from being a Domain-Specific Declarative Prompt-Programming Framework to being a General-Purpose Declarative Prompt-Programming Framework, depending on its declarative prompt-programming application scope.
- It can range from being a Lightweight Declarative Prompt-Programming Framework to being a Comprehensive Declarative Prompt-Programming Framework, depending on its declarative prompt-programming integration capability.
- It can range from being a Specialized Declarative Prompt-Programming Framework to being a Universal Declarative Prompt-Programming Framework, depending on its declarative prompt-programming model compatibility.
- ...
- It can integrate with Retrieval-Augmented Generation Pipelines for structured document processing.
- It can connect to LLM API for standardized model interaction.
- It can support Agent Orchestration Systems for multi-step workflow management.
- It can interface with Version Control Systems for declarative prompt-programming history tracking.
- It can incorporate External Knowledge Sources via declarative prompt-programming retrieval mechanisms.
- It can work with Validation Tools for declarative prompt-programming quality assurance.
- ...
- Examples:
- Declarative Prompt-Programming Framework Implementations, such as:
- YAML-Based Declarative Prompt-Programming Frameworks, such as:
- IBM PDL (Prompt Declaration Language) using YAML with Jinja2 for templating functions and type checking via JSON Schema.
- PromptLang developed by Netflix for content recommendation prompt systems.
- Pathway Templates for declarative prompt-programming structured workflows.
- JSON-Based Declarative Prompt-Programming Frameworks, such as:
- DSL-Based Declarative Prompt-Programming Frameworks, such as:
- YAML-Based Declarative Prompt-Programming Frameworks, such as:
- Declarative Prompt-Programming Framework Application Domains, such as:
- Controlled Chatbot Declarative Prompt-Programming Frameworks for regulated conversation flow.
- RAG Pipeline Declarative Prompt-Programming Frameworks for document retrieval workflow.
- Regulated Domain Declarative Prompt-Programming Frameworks for finance and legal applications requiring auditability.
- Code Generation Declarative Prompt-Programming Frameworks for structured programming tasks.
- Chain-of-Thought Declarative Prompt-Programming Frameworks for multi-step reasoning processes.
- ReAct Agent Declarative Prompt-Programming Frameworks for reasoning and acting cycles.
- Declarative Prompt-Programming Framework Capability Implementations, such as:
- ...
- Declarative Prompt-Programming Framework Implementations, such as:
- Counter-Examples:
- Prompt-Optimization Frameworks, such as DSPy and TextGrad, which focus on prompt tuning and automation rather than declarative structure and human readability.
- Imperative Prompt-Programming Frameworks, which use procedural code to directly define the execution flow of LLM interactions with emphasis on how rather than what.
- Ad-hoc Prompt Design Approaches, which lack formal structure, schema validation, and reusable components that characterize declarative prompt-programming frameworks.
- Template-Only Systems, which provide basic text substitution without the full declarative prompt-programming capabilities like schema validation and control flow.
- Model-Specific Frameworks that tightly couple prompt design to specific LLM implementations, lacking the model-agnostic abstraction of declarative prompt-programming frameworks.
- See: Prompt Engineering, LLM Orchestration Framework, Declarative Programming, YAML Configuration, JSON Schema, Domain-Specific Language, Model-Driven Engineering, Structured Output Generation, Retrieval-Augmented Generation, Chain-of-Thought Prompting.