1995 Centering

From GM-RKB
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Subject Headings: Centering Theory, Referring Expression, Discourse-level Analysis Task.

Notes

Cited By

Quotes

Abstract

This paper concerns relationships among focus of attention, choice of referring expression, and perceived coherence of utterances within a discourse segment. It presents a framework and initial theory of centering intended to model the local component of attentional state. The paper examines interactions between local coherence and choice of referring expressions; it argues that differences in coherence correspond in part to the inference demands made by different types of referring expressions, given a particular attentional state. It demonstrates that the attentional state properties modeled by centering can account for these differences.


References

  • Baldwin, Breck (1993). “Anaphora resolution with centering.” In: Workshop on Centering Theory in Naturally-Occurring Discourse. Philadelphia, PA, May (1993).
  • Barwise, J., and Perry, J. (1983). Situations and Attitudes. MIT Press.
  • Brennan, Susan E. (In press). “Centering attention in discourse." Language and Cognitive Processes.
  • Susan E. Brennan, Marilyn W. Friedman, Carl J. Pollard, A centering approach to pronouns, Proceedings of the 25th annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, p.155-162, July 06-09, 1987, Stanford, California doi:10.3115/981175.981197
  • Cote, Sharon (1992). “Discourse functions of two types of null objects in English.” In: Linguistic Society of America Annual Meeting, 12.
  • Cote, Sharon (1993). “Ranking and forward-looking centers.” In: Workshop on Centering Theory in Naturally-Occurring Discourse. Philadelphia, PA, May (1993).
  • Barbara Di Eugenio, Centering theory and the Italian pronominal system, Proceedings of the 13th conference on Computational linguistics, p.270-275, August 20-25, 1990, Helsinki, Finland doi:10.3115/997939.997986
  • Donnellan, K. S. (1966). “Reference and definite description." The Philosophical Review, 75.
  • Gordon, Peter C., and Chan, Davina (in press). “The effects of referring expressions and passivisation on processing sentences in coherent discourse.” In: CUNY Sentence Processing Conference. Amherst, MA.
  • Gordon, Peter C., and Chan, Davina (1995). “Pronouns, passives and discourse coherence.” In: Journal of Memory and Language, 34, to appear.
  • Gordon, Peter C., and Scearce, Kimberly A. (1995). “Pronominalization and discourse coherence, discourse structure and pronoun interpretation.” In: Journal of Memory and Language, 34, to appear.
  • Gordon, Peter C.; Grosz, Barbara J.; and Gilliom, Laura A. (1993). “Pronouns, names and the centering of attention in discourse." Cognitive Science, 17(3), 311--348.
  • Grice, H. P. (1969). “Utterer's meaning and intentions." Philosophical Review, 68(2), 147--177.
  • Grosz, Barbara J. (1977). “The representation and use of focus in dialogue understanding." Technical Report 151, SRI International, 333 Ravenswood Ave, Menlo Park, CA 94025.
  • Grosz, Barbara J. (1981). “Focusing and description in natural language dialogues.” In: Elements of Discourse Understanding, edited by A. Joshi, B. Webber, and I. Sag, 85--105. Cambridge University Press.
  • Grosz, Barbara J., and Hirschberg, Julia (1992). “Some intonational characteristics of discourse structure.” In: Proceedings, International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Volume 1. Banff, Alberta, Canada, October 1992, 429--432.
  • (Grosz et al., 1983) ⇒ Barbara J Grosz, Aravind K Joshi, and Scott Weinstein. (1983). “Providing a Unified Account of Definite Noun Phrases in Discourse.” In: Proceedings of the 21st annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics.
  • Grosz, Barbara J.; Joshi, Aravind K.; and Weinstein, Scott (1986). “Towards a computational theory of discourse interpretation." Unpublished ms.
  • Grosz, Barbara J., and Kraus, Sarit (1993). “Collaborative plans for group activities.” In: Proceedings, IJCAI-93, Volume 1. Chambery, France, September 1993, 367--373.
  • Barbara J. Grosz, Candace L. Sidner, Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse, Computational Linguistics, v.12 n.3, p.175-204, July-September 1986
  • 21 Hirschberg, Julia, and Ward, Gregory (1991). “Accent and bound anaphora." Cognitive Linguistics, 2(2), 101--121.
  • 22 Hoffman, Beryl, and Turan, Umit (1993). “Zero and overt pronouns in Turkish.” In: Workshop on Centering Theory in Naturally-Occurring Discourse. Philadelphia, PA, May (1993).
  • Hudson, Susan B.; Tanenhaus, Michael K.; and Dell, Gary S. (1986). “The effect of the Discourse Center on the local coherence of a discourse.” In: Proceedings, Eighth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Society. 96--101. Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Hudson-D'Zmura, Susan B. (1988). The structure of discourse and anaphor resolution: The discourse center and the roles of nouns and pronouns. Doctoral dissertation, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.
  • Hurewitz, Felicia, and Linson, Brian (1993). “A discourse analysis of raising constructions with to seem.” In: Workshop on Centering Theory in Naturally-Occurring Discourse. Philadelphia, PA, May (1993).
  • Joshi, Aravind K., and Kuhn, Steve (1979). “Centered logic: The role of entity centered sentence representation in natural language inferencing.” In: Proceedings, International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 435--439.
  • Joshi, Aravind K., and Weinstein, Scott (1981). “Control of inference: Role of some aspects of discourse structure---centering.” In: Proceedings, International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 385--387.
  • Kameyama, Megumi (1985). Zero anaphora: The case of Japanese. Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Linguistics Department, Stanford, CA.
  • Megumi Kameyama, A property-sharing constraint in Centering, Proceedings of the 24th annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, p.200-206, July 10-13, 1986, New York, New York doi:10.3115/981131.981159
  • Kameyama, Megumi (1988). “Japanese zero pronominal binding, where syntax and discourse meet.” In: Papers from the Second International Workshop on Japanese Syntax, edited by William Poser. CSLI. Also available as University of Pennsylvania Technical Report MS-CIS-86-60.
  • Kameyama, Megumi (1993). “Intersentential centering.” In: Workshop on Centering Theory in Naturally-Occurring Discourse. Philadelphia, PA, May (1993).
  • Andrew Kehler, The effect of establishing coherence in ellipsis and anaphora resolution, Proceedings of the 31st annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, p.62-69, June 22-26, 1993, Columbus, Ohio doi:10.3115/981574.981583
  • Kripke, S. (1977). “Speaker's reference and semantic reference.” In: Contemporary Perspectives in the Philosophy of Language, edited by P. French, T. Uehling, and H. Wettstein, 255--276. University of Minnesota Press.
  • Karen Elizabeth Lochbaum, Using collaborative plans to model the intentional structure of discourse, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 1995
  • Nakatani, Christine (1993). “Accenting on pronouns and proper names in spontaneous narrative.” In: European Speech Communication Association Workshop on Prosody. Lund, Sweden, September 1993, 164--167.
  • Rebecca J. Passonneau, Some facts about centers, indexicals, and demonstratives, Proceedings of the 29th annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, p.63-70, June 18-21, 1991, Berkeley, California doi:10.3115/981344.981353
  • Rebecca J. Passonneau, Getting and keeping the center of attention, A symposium on future directions in natural language processing on Challenges in natural language processing, p.179-227, January 1993, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
  • Prince, Ellen F. (1994). “Subject-prodrop in Yiddish.” In: In Focus and Natural Language Processing, Volume 1: Intonation and Syntax, edited by P. Bosch, 159--174. Working Papers of the IBM Institute for Logic and Linguistics 6.
  • Prince, Ellen F., and Walker, Marilyn A. (1995). “A bilateral approach to givenness: a hearer-status algorithm and a centering algorithm.” In: Proceedings, 4th International Pragmatics Conference. Benjamins, to appear.
  • Rambow, Owen (1993). “Pragmatic aspects of scrambling and topicalization in German.” In: Workshop on Centering Theory in Naturally-Occurring Discourse. Philadelphia, PA, May (1993).
  • Rachel Reichman, Getting computers to talk like you and me, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1985
  • Roberts, Craige (1993). “Centering and anaphora resolution in discourse representation theory.” In: Workshop on Centering Theory in Naturally-Occurring Discourse. Philadelphia, PA, May (1993).
  • Candace L Sidner, Towards a Computational Theory of Definite Anaphora Comprehension in English Discourse, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 1979
  • Sparck Jones, Karen (1993). “How do I center large-scale text structure.” In: Workshop on Centering Theory in Naturally-Occurring Discourse. Philadelphia, PA, May (1993).
  • Suri, Linda, and McCoy, Kathleen (1993). “Comparing focusing and centering and problems with complex sentences.” In: Workshop on Centering Theory in Naturally-Occurring Discourse. Philadelphia, PA, May (1993).
  • Turan, Umit (1995). Null vs. overt subjects in Turkish: A centering approach. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Marilyn A. Walker, Evaluating discourse processing algorithms, Proceedings of the 27th annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, p.251-261, June 26-29, 1989, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada doi:10.3115/981623.981654
  • Walker, Marilyn A. (1993). “Initial contexts and shifting centers.” In: Workshop on Centering Theory in Naturally-Occurring Discourse. Philadelphia, PA, May (1993).
  • Marilyn Walker, Steve Whittaker, Mixed initiative in dialogue: an investigation into discourse segmentation, Proceedings of the 28th annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, p.70-78, June 06-09, 1990, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania doi:10.3115/981823.981833
  • Walker, Marilyn A., Iida, Masayo, and Cote, Sharon (1990). “Centering in Japanese discourse.” In: Proceedings, 13th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-90), Helsinki, 1.
  • Marilyn Walker, Sharon Cote, Masayo Iida, Japanese discourse and the process of centering, Computational Linguistics, v.20 n.2, p.193-232, June 1994
  • 52 Webber, Bonnie Lynn (1978). A formal approach to discourse anaphora. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. Garland Press.
  • Yongkyoon, N. (1991). “A centering approach to the *{case}{topic} restriction in Korean." Linguistics, 29, 653--668.
  • Ziv, Yael, and Grosz, Barbara J. (1994). “Right dislocation and attentional state.” In: Papers from the Israel Association of Theoretical Linguistics Meetings, edited by R. Buchalla and A. Mittwoch, 184--199. Akademon,


 AuthorvolumeDate ValuetitletypejournaltitleUrldoinoteyear
1995 CenteringBarbara J. Grosz
Scott Weinstein
Aravind K. Joshi
Centering: A Framework for Modeling the Local Coherence of Discoursehttp://acl.ldc.upenn.edu/J/J95/J95-2003.pdf