1996 AnAnalysisOfCompoundsInHPSG

From GM-RKB
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Subject Headings(s): Compound Noun, Natural Language Database Interface, HPSG.

Notes

Cited By

Quotes

Author Keywords

  • Natural language interfaces to databases; Unification-based-grammar formalisms; Compounding

Abstract

Compounds can be analyzed in HPSG as head/complement structures, corresponding to verbal compounds, and head/adjunct structures, corresponding to non-verbal compounds. The rules that create these structures are also responsible for paraphrases using prepositional modification. Although compounds are often thought to have a high structural ambiguity, we show that the distinction between head/complement compounding and head/adjunct compounding together with general semantic considerations eliminates ambiguity. Finally, for database interfaces, the notion of a semantic field is useful for solving problems of noncompositionality of compounds.


References

  • [1] N. Cercone, Jiawei Han, P. McFetridge, F. Popowich, Y. Cai, D. Fass, C. Groeneboer, G. Hall and Y. Huang, SystemX and DBLearn: Easily Getting More from Your Relational Database, in F. Golshani (ed.), Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering, Special Issue on Intelligent Information Systems (invited paper) 1 (4) (1994) pp. 311-339.
  • [2] N. Cercone, P. McFetridge, F. Popowich, D. Fass, G. Groeneboer and G. Hall, The SystemX Natural Language Interface to Relational Databases, in J.G. Chen, F.G. Attia and D.L. Crabtree (eds.), EXPERSYS-94: Expert Systems Applications and Artificial Intelligence, Proceedings of 6th International Conf on Artificial Intelligence and Expert Systems Applications, Houston, TX, 1-2 December 1994 (i.i.t.t. International, Gournay sur Marne, France, 1994) pp. 461-466.
  • [3] N. Cercone, P. McFetridge, F. Popowich, D. Fass, C. Groeneboer and G. Hall, The SystemX Natural Language Interface: Design, Implementation and Evaluation, Technical report CSS-IS TR 93-03 (Centre for Systems Science, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, 1993).
  • [4l R. Jackendoff, Syntax: A Study of Phrase Structure (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1977).
  • [5] R. Kittredge, Sublanguages, Am. J. Computational Linguistics 8(2) (1982) 79-82.
  • [6] K. Knight, Unification: A Multidisciplinary Survey, ACM Computing Surveys 21(1) (1989) 93-124.
  • [7] P. McFetridge, Processing English Database Queries with Head Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, In: Proceedings of 2nd Joint Australia-Japan Symposium on Natural Language Processing, Iizuka, Japan, (1991). P. McFetridge et al. / Data & Knowledge Engineering 20 (1996) 195-209 209
  • [8] C. Pollard and I. Sag, Information-based Syntax and Semantics (Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford, CA, 1987).
  • [9] C. Pollard and 1. Sag, Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1994).
  • [10] F. Popowich, P. McFetridge, D. Fass and G. Hall, Processing Complex Noun Phrases in a Natural Language Interface to a Statistical Database, In: Proceedings of 14th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-92), Nantes, France, 1992.
  • [11] G. Ritchie, G. Russell, A. Black and S. Pulman, Computational Morphology (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1992).
  • [12] E. Selkirk, The Syntax of Words (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1982).
  • [13] S.P. Shwartz, Problems with Domain-Dependent Natural Language Database Access Systems, In: Proceedings of 20th Annual Meeting ~f the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL-82), Toronto, ON, 1982, pp. 60-62.
  • [14] Karen Spärck Jones, So What about Parsing Compound Nouns?, in Karen Spärck Jones and Y. Wilks (eds.), Automatic Natural Language Parsing (Halsted Press, New York, NY, 1983) pp. 164-168.

,

 AuthorvolumeDate ValuetitletypejournaltitleUrldoinoteyear
1996 AnAnalysisOfCompoundsInHPSGFred Popowich
Paul McFetridge
Dan Fass
An Analysis of Compounds in HPSG (Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar) for Database Querieshttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-023X(96)00033-X10.1016/S0169-023X(96)00033-X