2008 MultimediaInterpForDynOntologyEvol

(Castano et al., 2008) ⇒ Silvana Castano, Sofia Espinosa, Alfio Ferrara, Vangelis Karkaletsis, Atila Kaya, Ralf Möller, Stefano Montanelli, Georgios Petasis, and Michael Wessel. (2008). “Multimedia Interpretation for Dynamic Ontology Evolution.” In: Journal of Logic and Computation, 19(5). doi:10.1093/logcom/exn049

Subject Headings: BOEMIE Project.

Notes

Cited By

(Karkaletsis et al., 2011) ⇒ Vangelis Karkaletsis, Pavlina Fragkou, Georgios Petasis and Elias Iosif. (2011). “Ontology Based Information Extraction from Text.” In: Knowledge-Driven Multimedia Information Extraction and Ontology Evolution. Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-20795-2_4

Quotes

Author Keywords

Multimedia Interpretation; Ontology Evolution; Ontology Dynamics; Description Logics; OWL; Multimedia Ontologies.

Abstract

The recent success of distributed and dynamic infrastructures for knowledge sharing has raised the need for semiautomatic/automatic ontology evolution strategi es. Ontology evolution is generally defined as the timely adaptation of an ontology to changing requirements and the consistent propagation of changes to dependent artifacts. In this article, we present an ontology evolution approach in the context of multimedia interpretation. Ontology evolution in this context relies on the results obtained through reasoning for the interpretation of multimedia resources, through population of the ontology with new individuals or through enrichment of the ontology with new concepts and new semantic relations. The article analyses the results of interpretation, population and enrichment obtained in evaluation experiments in terms of measures such as precision and recall. The evaluation reveals encouraging results.

References

1. Alani, H., Kim, S., Millard, D., Weal, M., Hall, W., Lewis, P., Shadbolt, N.: Automatic ontology-based knowledge extraction from web documents. IEEE Intelligent Systems 18 (2003) 14{21
2. Buitelaar, P., Cimiano, P., Racioppa, S., Siegel, M.: Ontology-based information extraction with soba. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation. (2006) 2321{2324
3. Franz Baader, Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P.F., eds.: The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications. Cambridge University Press (2003)
4. Franz Baader, Nutt, W.: Basic description logics. In Franz Baader, Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P.F., eds.: The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation and Applications. Cambridge University Press (2003) 43{95
5. Thagard, R.P.: The best explanation: Criteria for theory choice. The Journal of Philosophy (1978)
6. Castano, S., Ferrara, A., Montanelli, S.: Matching ontologies in open networked systems: Techniques and applications. Journal on Data Semantics (JoDS) V (2006)
7. Bruno, S., Castano, S., Ferrara, A., Lorusso, D., Messa, G., Montanelli, S.: Ontology Coordination Tools: Version 2. Technical Report D4.7, BOEMIE Project, FP6-027538, 6th EU Framework Programme (2007)
8. Hartigan, J.: Clustering algorithms. John Wiley (1975)
9. Gerard M. Salton: Automatic Text Processing: The Transformation, Analysis, and Retrieval of Information by Computer. Addison-Wesley (1989)
10. Espinosa, S., Kaya, A., Melzer, S., M?oller, R.,Wessel, M.: Towards a media interpretation framework for the semantic web. The 2007 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI`07) (2007)
11. Haarslev, V., M?oller, R., Wessel, M.: RacerPro User's Guide and Reference Manual Version 1.9.1 (2007)
12. Castano, S., Ferrara, A., Messa, G.: ISLab HMatch Results for OAEI 2006. In: Proceedings of ISWC International Workshop on Ontology Matching, Athens, Georgia, USA (2006)
13. Ding, Y., Foo, S.: Ontology research and development. part 2 - a review of ontology mapping and evolving. Journal of Information Science 28 (2002) 375{388
14. Haase, P., Stojanovic, L.: Consistent evolution of owl ontologies. In Gomez-Perez, A., Euzenat, J., eds.: ESWC. Volume 3532 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science., Springer (2005) 182{197
15. Oberle, D., Volz, R., Motik, B., Staab, S.: An extensible ontology software environment. In Staab, S., Studer, R., eds.: Handbook on Ontologies. International Handbooks on Information Systems. Springer (2004) 311{333
16. Aliseda-Llera, A.: Seeking Explanations: Abduction in Logic, Philosophy of Science and Artifical Intelligence. PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam (1997)
17. Paul, G.: Approaches to Abductive Reasoning{An Overview. AI Review 7 (1993) 109{152
18. Mayer, M.C., Pirri, F.: First-Order Abduction via Tableau and Sequent Calculi. Bulletin of the IPGL 1 (1993) 99{117
19. Shanahan, M.: Perception as Abduction: Turning Sensor Data Into Meaningful Representation. Cognitive Science 29 (2005) 103{134
20. Neumann, B., M?oller, R.: On Scene Interpretation with Description Logics. In Christensen, H., Nagel, H.H., eds.: Cognitive Vision Systems: Sampling the Spectrum of Approaches. Number 3948 in LNCS. Springer (2006) 247{278
21. Elsenbroich, C., Kutz, O., Sattler, U.: A case for abductive reasoning over ontologies. In: ProceedingsOWL: Experiences and Directions, Athens, Georgia, USA, November 10-11. (2006)
22. Hobbs, J.R., Stickel, M., Appelt, D., Martin, P.: Interpretation as abduction. Artificial Intelligence Journal Vol. 63 (1993) 69{142
23. Kakas, A., Denecker, M.: Abduction in logic programming. In Kakas, A., Sadri, F., eds.: Computational Logic: Logic Programming and Beyond. Part I. Number 2407 in LNAI. Springer (2002) 402{436
24. Euzenat, J., Shvaiko, P.: Ontology matching. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg (DE) (2007)
25. Rahm, E., Do, H.H.: Data cleaning: Problems and current approaches. IEEE Data Eng. Bull. 23 (2000) 3{13
26. Zhang, D., Jing, L.: Context-based integration of numerical information. In: CEC '05: Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on E-Commerce Technology (CEC'05), Washington, DC, USA, IEEE Computer Society (2005) 418{421
27. Fan, W., Lu, H., Madnick, S.E., Cheung, D.: Discovering and reconciling value conicts for numerical data integration. Inf. Syst. 26 (2001) 635{656
28. Levenshtein, V.: Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Soviet Physics Doklady 10 (1966) 707{710
29. Bilenko, M., Mooney, R., Cohen, W., Ravikumar, P., Fienberg, S.: Adaptive name matching in information integration. IEEE Intelligent Systems 18 (2003) 16{23
30. Carey, M.J., Schneider, D.A., eds.: The Merge/Purge Problem for Large Databases. In: Carey, M.J., Schneider, D.A., eds.: Proceedings of the 1995 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, San Jose, California, May 22-25, 1995, ACM Press (1995)
31. Monge, A.E., Elkan, C.: An efficient domain-independent algorithm for detecting approximately duplicate database records. In: DMKD. (1997) 0{
32. Bertolazzi, P., DeSantis, L., Scannapieco, M.: Automatic record matching in cooperative information systems. In: International Workshop on Data Quality in Cooperative Information Systems. (2003)
33. Singla, P., Pedro Domingos: Multi-relational record linkage. In: MRDM Workshop. (2004)
34. Ananthakrishna, R., Chaudhuri, S., Ganti, V.: Eliminating fuzzy duplicates in data warehouses. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Very Large Databases (VLDB 2002). (2002)
35. Wang, C., Lu, J., Zhang, G.: Integration of ontology data through learning instance matching. In: Web Intelligence. (2006) 536{539
36. Engmann, D., Massmann, S.: Instance matching with coma++. In: BTW Workshops. (2007) 28{37
37. Chua, C.E.H., Chiang, R.H.L., Lim, E.P.: Instance-based attribute identification in database integration. The VLDB Journal 12 (2003) 228{243,

	Author	volume	Date Value	title	type	journal	titleUrl	doi	note	year
2008 MultimediaInterpForDynOntologyEvol	Vangelis Karkaletsis Georgios Petasis Silvana Castano Sofia Espinosa Alfio Ferrara Atila Kaya Ralf Möller Stefano Montanelli Michael Wessel			Multimedia Interpretation for Dynamic Ontology Evolution		Journal of Logic and Computation	http://www.sts.tu-harburg.de/~r.f.moeller/papers/2008/CEF+08.pdf	10.1093/logcom/exn049		2008