1974 JudgmentunderUncertaintyHeurist

From GM-RKB
Jump to: navigation, search

Subject Headings: Human Judgement.

Notes

Cited By

Quotes

Abstract

This article described three heuristics that are employed in making judgements under uncertainty: (i) representativeness, which is usually employed when people are asked to judge the probability that an object or event A belongs to class or process B; (ii) availability of instances or scenarios, which is often employed when people are asked to assess the frequency of a class or the plausibility of a particular development; and (iii) adjustment from an anchor, which is usually employed in numerical prediction when a relevant value is available. These heuristics are highly economical and usually effective, but they lead to systematic and predictable errors. A better understanding of these heuristics and of the biases to which they lead could improve judgements and decisions in situations of uncertainty.

References

;

 AuthorvolumeDate ValuetitletypejournaltitleUrldoinoteyear
1974 JudgmentunderUncertaintyHeuristAmos Tversky
Daniel Kahneman
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases10.1126/science.185.4157.11241974
AuthorAmos Tversky + and Daniel Kahneman +
doi10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 +
titleJudgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases +
year1974 +