2011 SEAN

From GM-RKB
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Subject Headings: Semantic Annotation Task, Ontology.

Notes

Cited By

Quotes

Author Keywords

Semantic annotation, semantic search, highly accurate closed domains, multi-ontology.

Abstract

Semantic annotation has gained momentum with the emergence of the current user-generated content paradigm on the Web. The ever-growing quantity of collaborative data sources has resulted in the requirement for efficient approaches to create, integrate and retrieve information more efficiently in an environment where the users ask for accurate information. The main research challenge of the current work is using manual semantic annotation in a highly accurate closed domain, a conceptual domain with a minimal set of concepts where the benefits of adding semantics, search efficiency, optimization and the cost estimations are viable. This paper presents a semantic annotation approach for highly accurate closed domain based on multi-ontology annotation (domain and application ontologies).


References

  • Alani, H, Hall W, O’Hara K, Shadbolt N, Szomszor M, Chandler P (2008). Building a Pragmatic Semantic Web. IEEE Intell. Syst., 23(3): 61-68.
  • Argüello-Casteleiro M, Abusa M, Fernandez-Prieto MJ, Brookes V, Abanda FH (2007). A web services-based annotation application for semantic annotation of highly specialised documents about the field of marketing. In: Proceedings of the 2007 OTM Confederated international conference.
  • Azouaou F, Desmoulins C, Chen W (2004). Semantic Annotation Tools for Learning Material. In: Arroyo, L., Dicheva, D. (Eds.) Proceedings of Workshop on Applications of Semantic Web Technologies for Adaptive Educational Hypermedia Systems, pp. 359-364.
  • Battré D (2008). Caching of intermediate results in DHT-based RDF stores. International International J. Metadata Semant. Ontol., 4(3): 183-195.
  • Sean Bechhofer, Carr L, Goble C, Kampa S, Miles-Board T (2002). The Semantics of Semantic Annotation. In: Proceedings of CoopIS/DOA/ODBASE, pp. 1152-1167.
  • Sean Bechhofer, Carr L, Goble C, Kampa S, Miles-Board T (2002). The Semantics of Semantic Annotation. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (Eds.), Proceedings of CoopIS/DOA/ODBASE, Berlin / Heidelberg, Springer, pp. 1152-1167.
  • Benjamins VR, Davies J, Baeza-Yates R, Mika P, Zaragoza H., Greaves, Gómez-Pérez, JM, Contreras, J Domingue J, Dieter Fensel (2008). Near-Term Prospects for Semantic Technologies. IEEE Intell. Syst., 23(1): 76-88.
  • Tim Berners-Lee, Hendler J, Lassila O (2001). The semantic web. Sci. Am., 284(5): 34-43.
  • Bhogal J, Macfarlane A, Smith P (2007). A review of ontology based query expansion. Inform. Process. Manag., 43(4): 866-886.
  • Bowers S, Cao H, Schildhauer M, Jones M, Leinfelder B, O'Brien MA (2010). Semantic annotation framework for retrieving and analyzing observational datasets. In: Proceedings of the third workshop on Exploiting semantic annotations in information retrieval. New York, NY, USA: ACM, pp. 31-32.
  • Cardoso J (2007). The Semantic Web Vision: Where are We?. IEEE Intell. Syst., 22(5): 22-26.
  • Caussanel J, Cahier JP, Zacklan M, Charlet J (2002). Cognitive Interactions in the Semantic Web. In: Frank, M., et al. (eds) Proceedings of the WWW2002 International Workshop on the Semantic Web, Hawaii, May 7, 2002.
  • Chapman S, Dingli A, Fabio Ciravegna (2004). Armadillo: harvesting information for the semantic web. In: Proceedings of the 27th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. New York, NY: ACM, pp. 598-598.
  • Philipp Cimiano, Ladwig G, Staab S (2005). Gimme’ the context: contextdriven automatic semantic annotation with C-PANKOW. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on World Wide Web. New York, NY: ACM, pp. 332-341.
  • Fabio Ciravegna, Dingli A, Petrelli D, Wilks Y (2002) User-system cooperation in document annotation based on information extraction. In Gómez-Pérez, A., Benjamins, V.R. (Eds.), 13th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Management (EKAW 2002), LNCS 2473. Berlin / Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 122-137.
  • Colomo-Palacios R. García-Crespo Á, Soto-Acosta P, Ruano-Mayoral M, Jiménez-López D (2010). A case analysis of semantic technologies for R&D intermediation information management. International J. Inf. Manage., 30(5): 465-469.
  • Colomo-Palacios R, Gómez-Berbís JM, García-Crespo A, Puebla- Sánche I (2008). Social Global Repository: using semantics and social web in software projects. International J. Knowl. Learning, 4(5): 452-464.
  • Davies J, Lytras MD, Sheth AP (2007). Semantic-Web-based Knowledge Management. IEEE International Comp., 11(5): 14-16.
  • (Dill et al., 2003a) ⇒ Stephen Dill, Nadav Eiron, David Gibson, Daniel Gruhl, Ramanathan V. Guha, Anant Jhingran, Tapas Kanungo, Sridhar Rajagopalan, Andrew Tomkins, John A. Tomlin, and Jason Y. Zien. (2003). “SemTag and Seeker: Bootstrapping the semantic web via automated semantic annotation.” In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW 2003). doi:10.1145/775152.775178
  • Ding Y (2010). Semantic Web: Who is who in the field — a bibliometric analysis. J. Inf. Sci., 36(3): 335-356.
  • Ding Y, Embley DW, Liddle SW (2006). Automatic Creation and Simplified Querying of Semantic Web Content: An Approach Based on Information-Extraction Ontologies. In: Mizoguchi, R., Shi, Z., Giunchiglia, F. (eds) Proceedings of the First Asian Semantic Web Conference (ASWC'06). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 400-414.
  • Dong A, Li H (2006). Multi-ontology Based Multimedia Annotation for Do-main-specific Information Retrieval. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Sensor Networks, Ubiquitous and Trusworthy Computing (SUTC’ 06). Los Alamitos, California: IEEE Computer Soc. Press, pp. 158-165.
  • Durguin JK, Sherif JS (2008). The semantic web: a catalyst for future ebusiness. Kybernetes, 37(1): 49-65.
  • Ebrahim NA, Ahmed S, Taha Z (2010). SMEs; Virtual research and development (R&D) teams and new product development: A literature review. International J. Phys. Sci., 5(7): 916-930 Euzenat J (2002). Research challenges and perspectives of the Semantic Web. IEEE Intell. Syst., 17(5): 86-88.
  • Dieter Fensel, Munsen MA (2001). The Semantic Web: A Brain for Humankind. IEEE Intell. Syst., 16(2): 24-25.
  • Dieter Fensel (2002). Ontologies: A silver bullet for knowledge management and electronic commerce. Berlin: Springer. Dieter Fensel, van Harmelen F, Ian Horrocks, McGuinness DL, Patel- Schneider PF (2001). OIL: An ontology infrastructure for the semantic web. IEEE Intell. Syst., 16(2): 38-45.
  • Fernández-Breis JT, Castellanos-Nieves D, Valencia-García R (2009). Measuring Individual Learning Performance in Group Work from a Knowledge Integration perspective. Info. Sci., 179(4): 339-354.
  • Ferreira N (2010). Social Networks and Young People: A Case Study. International J. Hum. Capital Inf. Technol. Prof., 1(4): 31-54.
  • García R (2010). Using the Rhizomer Platform for Semantic Decision Support Systems Development. International J. Decision Support Syst. Technol., 2(1): 60-80.
  • García-Crespo A, Colomo-Palacios R, Gómez-Berbís JM, García- Sánchez F (2010a). SOLAR: Social Link Advanced Recommendation System. Future Gener. Comp. Sys., 26(3): 374-380.
  • García-Crespo A, Colomo-Palacios R, Gómez-Berbís JM, Mencke M (2009). BMR: Benchmarking Metrics Recommender for Personnel issues in Software Development Projects. International J. Comput. Intell. Syst., 2(3): 257-267.
  • García-Crespo A, Colomo-Palacios R, Gómez-Berbís JM, Ruiz-Mezcua B (2010b). SEMO: a framework for customer social networks analysis based on semantics. J. Inf. Technol., 25(2): 178-188.
  • García-Crespo Á, Gómez-Berbís JM, Colomo-Palacios R, García- Sánchez F (2011). Digital Libraries and Web 3.0. The CallimachusDL Approach. Comput. Hum. Behav., doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.046 García-Manotas I, Lupiani G, García-Sánchez F, Valencia-García R (2010). Populating Knowledge Based Decision Support Systems. International J. Decision Support Syst. Technol., 2(1): 1-20.
  • García-Sánchez F, Fernández-Breis JT, Valencia-García R, Gómez JM, Martínez-Béjar R (2008). Combining Semantic Web Technologies with Multi-Agent Systems for Integrated Access to Biological Resources. J. Biomed. Inform.., 41(5): 848-859.
  • Gennari JH, Neal ML, Galdzicki M, Cook DL (2010) Multiple ontologies in action: Composite annotations for biosimulation models. J. Biomed. Inform., doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2010.06.007.
  • Gómez BJM, Colomo PR, García CA, Ruiz MB (2008). ProLink: a semantics-based social network for software projects. International J. Technol. Manage., 7(4): 392-405.
  • Gómez JM, Mencke M, Chamizo J, Colomo R, García-Crespo A (2008). EsaCake: A Semantic Software Environment for Sharing Software Projects Knowledge Based on the ESA Software Methodology. In: A. Mellouk, J. Bi, G. Ortiz, D. Chiu, M. Popescu (eds.) Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Internet and Web Applications and Services (ICIW 2008). Los Alamitos, California: IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 535-540.
  • Gruber TR (2008). Collective Knowledge Systems: Where the Social Web meets the Semantic Web. Web Semant., 6(1): 4-13.
  • Gruber TR (1993). A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Know. Acquis., 5(2): 199-220.
  • Guha R, McCool R, Miller E (2003). Semantic Search. In: WWW '03 Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on World Wide Web, Budapest, Hungary. New York, NY: ACM, pp. 700-709.
  • Handschuh S, Staab S (2003). Cream: Creating metadata for the semantic web. Coput. Netw., 42(5): 579-598.
  • Handschuh S, Staab S, Maedche A (2001). CREAM – creating relational metadata with a component-based, ontology-driven annotation framework. In: First International Conference on Knowledge Capture (K-CAP 2001). New York, NY: ACM, pp. 76-86.
  • Heflin J, Hendler JA (2001). Portrait of the Semantic Web in Action. IEEE Intell. Syst., 16(2): 54-59.
  • Hendler J (2008). Web 3.0: Chicken Farms on the Semantic Web. Comp., 41(1): 106-108.
  • Ian Horrocks (2008). Ontologies and the Semantic Web. Communications of the ACM, 51(12): 58-67.
  • Kahan J, Koivunen MR (2001). Annotea: an open RDF infrastructure for shared web annotations. In: WWW '01 Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on World Wide Web. New York, NY: ACM, 623-632.
  • Kim HL, Decker S, Breslin JG (2010) Representing and sharing folksonomies with semantics. J. Inf. Sci., 36(1): 52-72.
  • Kiryakov A, Borislav Popov, Terziev I, Manov D, Ognyanoff D (2004). Semantic Annotation, Indexing, and Retrieval. Web Semant., 2(1): 49-79.
  • Lassila O, Hendler J (2007). Embracing “Web 3.0”. IEEE Internet Comp., 11(3): 90-93.
  • Liu Y, Li ZZ (2009) Research of Semantic Annotation Technology Based on Domain Ontology. In: Proceedings of the 2009 Second International Workshop on Computer Science and Engineering - Volume 02. Washington, DC: IEEE Comp. Soc., 358-361.
  • Lortal G, Lewkowicz M, Todirascu-Courtier A (2005). AnT&CoW, a tool supporting collective interpretation of documents through annotation and indexation. In: Dieng R., Matta N. (eds.) Proceedings of Workshop on Knowledge Management and Organizational Memories - IJCAI'05, Workshop, pp. 43-54.
  • Lukasiewicz,T, Straccia U (2008). Managing uncertainty and vagueness in description logics for the Semantic Web. Web Semant., 6(4): 291- 308.
  • Markoff J (2006). Entrepreneurs See a Web Guided by Common Sense. The N.Y. Times, 12 Nov. (2006).
  • Martinho R, Varajao J, Domingos D (2010). Using the semantic web to define a language for modelling controlled flexibility in software processes. IET Software, 4(6): 396-406.
  • Mena E, Kashyap V, Illarramendi A, Sheth A (2000). Imprecise Answers in Distributed Environments: Estimation of Information Loss for Multi- Ontology based Query Processing. International J. Coop. Inf. Syst., 9(4): 403- 425.
  • Mika P (2005). Flink: Semantic Web technology for the extraction and analysis of social networks. Web Semant., 3(2/3): 211-223.
  • Mikroyannidis A, Theodoulidis B (2010). Ontology management and evolution for business intelligence. International J. Inf. Manage., 30(6): 559- 566.
  • Morrison PJ (2008). Tagging and searching: Search retrieval effectiveness of folksonomies on the World Wide Web. Inform. Process. Manage., 44(4): 1562-1579.
  • Naeve A (2005). The Human Semantic Web Shifting from Knowledge Push to Knowledge Pull. International J. Semantic Web Inf. Syst., 1(3): 1-30.
  • Scheir P, Lindstaedt SN, Ghidini C (2008). A Network Model Approach to Retrieval in the Semantic Web. International J. Semantic Web Inf. Syst., 4(4): 56-84.
  • Schreiber G, Amin A, Aroyo L, Assem M, de Boer V, Hardman L, Hildebrand M, Omelayenko B, van Osenbruggen J, Tordai A, Wielemaker J, Wielinga B (2008). Semantic annotation and search of cultural-heritage collections: The MultimediaN E-Culture demonstrator. Web Semant., 6(4): 243-249.
  • Shadbolt N, Hall W, Tim Berners-Lee (2006). The semantic web revisited. IEEE Intell. Syst., 21(3): 96-101.
  • Shah U, Finin T, Joshi A (2002). Information retrieval on the semantic web. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Information and knowledge management. New York, NY: ACM, pp. 461-468.
  • Sheth A, Bertram C, Avant D, Hammond B, Kochut K, Warke Y (2002). Managing semantic content for the web. IEEE Internet Comp., 6(4): 80-87.
  • Smith B (2003). Ontology. An Introduction, In Floridi, L. (ed.), Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Computing and Information. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 155-166.
  • Soto-Acosta P, Casado-Lumbreras C, Cabezas-Isla F (2010). Shaping human capital in software development teams: the case of mentoring enabled by semantics. IET Software, 4(6): 445-452.
  • Rudi Studer, Benjamins VR, Dieter Fensel (1998). Knowledge engineering: Principles and methods. Data Knowl. Eng., 25(1-2): 161-197.
  • Tamma V (2010) Semantic Web Support for Intelligent Search and Retrieval of Business Knowledge. IEEE Intell. Syst., 25(1): 84-88.
  • Uren VS, Philipp Cimiano, Iria J, Handschuh S, Vargas-Vera M, Motta E, Cira-vegna F (2006). Semantic annotation for knowledge management: Requirements and a survey of the state of the art. Web Semant., 4(1): 14-28.
  • Vargas-Vera, M., Motta, E., Domingue, J., Lanzoni, M., Stutt, A., Ciravegna, F. (2002). MnM: ontology driven semi-automatic and automatic support for semantic markup. In: Gómez-Pérez, A., Benjamins, V.R. (Eds.) 13th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Management (EKAW 2002), LNCS 2473. Berlin / Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 213-221.
  • Vossen G, Lytras MD, Koudas N (2007). Editorial: Revisiting the (Machine) Semantic Web: The Missing Layers for the Human Semantic Web. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 19(2): 145-148.
  • Wang P, Xu BW, Lu JJ, Li YH, Jiang JH (2004). Bridge ontology: A multi-ontologies-based approach for semantic annotation. Wuhan Uni. J. Nat. Sci., 9(5): 617-622.
  • Warren P (2006). Knowledge Management and the Semantic Web: From Scenario to Technology. IEEE Intell. Syst., 21(1): 53-59.
  • Wartena C, Brussee R, Gazendam L, Huijsen WO (2007). Apolda: A Practical Tool for Semantic Annotation. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Data-base and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA '07). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 288-292.
  • Yang CY, Lin HY (2010). An automated semantic annotation based-on Wordnet ontology. In: Ko, F., Na, Y. (eds.) Sixth International Conference on Networked Computing and Advanced Information Management (NCM), pp. 682-687.
  • Yu JH, Albaum G, Swenson M (2003). Is a central tendency error inherent in the use of semantic differential scales in different cultures? International J. Mark. Res., 45(2): 213-228.

,

 AuthorvolumeDate ValuetitletypejournaltitleUrldoinoteyear
2011 SEANJuan Miguel Gómez-Berbís
Ricardo Colomo-Palacios
José Luis López-Cuadrado
Israel González-Carrasco
Ángel García-Crespo		SEAN: Multi-ontology semantic annotation for highly accurate closed domainsInternational Journal of the Physical Sciencehttp://www.academicjournals.org/ijps/PDF/pdf2011/18mar/Gómez-Berbís et al.pdf2011
Retrieved from "http://www.gabormelli.com/RKB/index.php?title=2011_SEAN&oldid=852800"