ContractNLI Task

A ContractNLI Task is a document-level natural language inference task that determines whether hypothesis statements are entailed by, contradict, or are not mentioned in legal contract documents while identifying supporting evidence spans.

• AKA: Contract Natural Language Inference Task, Contract-Hypothesis Inference Task, Document-Level Contract NLI Task, Contract Logical Relationship Task.
• Context:
  • It can typically process 607 non-disclosure agreements annotated with 17 fixed hypotheses across all contract documents.
  • It can typically perform three-class classification determining entailment, contradiction, or not mentioned relationships.
  • It can typically identify evidence spans as sentences or list items that support inference decisions.
  • It can typically handle imbalanced label distributions where not mentioned cases dominate the dataset.
  • It can typically address negation by exceptions and other contract-specific linguistic patterns.
  • It can typically require multi-label evidence identification for entailment and contradiction cases.
  • It can typically evaluate premise-hypothesis pairs where premises are contract excerpts and hypotheses are manually written statements.
  • It can typically support contract review automation by verifying contractual claims against actual contract text.
  • It can often facilitate automated compliance checking through hypothesis verification against contract provisions.
  • It can often enable contract consistency validation by detecting contradictory statements within agreements.
  • It can often provide interpretable results through evidence highlighting and span identification.
  • It can often serve as challenging benchmark due to scarce training data and complex legal language.
  • It can range from being a Binary ContractNLI Task to being a Three-Class ContractNLI Task, depending on its classification granularity.
  • It can range from being a Single-Hypothesis ContractNLI Task to being a Multi-Hypothesis ContractNLI Task, depending on its hypothesis count.
  • It can range from being a Sentence-Level ContractNLI Task to being a Document-Level ContractNLI Task, depending on its context scope.
  • It can range from being a NDA-Specific ContractNLI Task to being a General Contract ContractNLI Task, depending on its contract type coverage.
  • ...
• Examples:
  • ContractNLI Inference Types, such as:
    • ContractNLI Entailment Example: Premise states "Agreement is binding on parties" entails hypothesis "Agreement binds the parties."
    • ContractNLI Contradiction Example: Premise allows "30 days termination notice" contradicts hypothesis "Agreement cannot be terminated."
    • ContractNLI Neutral Example: Premise states "Agreement commences January 1" is neutral to hypothesis "Agreement starts in summer."
  • ContractNLI Hypothesis Categories, such as:
    • Termination Hypotheses about contract ending conditions.
    • Obligation Survival Hypotheses about post-termination duties.
    • Assignment Restriction Hypotheses about transfer limitations.
    • Confidentiality Duration Hypotheses about secrecy periods.
  • ContractNLI Dataset Components, such as:
    • ContractNLI Training Set with annotated NDAs for model training.
    • ContractNLI Test Set with held-out contracts for evaluation.
    • ContractNLI Evidence Annotations marking supporting spans.
  • ContractNLI Applications, such as:
    • Contract Review Systems using NLI for clause verification.
    • Legal AI Assistants checking contract interpretations.
    • Compliance Platforms validating regulatory requirements.
  • ...
• Counter-Examples:
  • CUAD Clause Classification Task, which performs clause extraction rather than inference.
  • LEDGAR Classification Task, which categorizes provision types rather than verifying hypotheses.
  • General NLI Task, which lacks legal domain specificity and contract focus.
  • Legal Question Answering Task, which retrieves answers rather than determining logical relationships.
• See: ContractNLI Dataset, Natural Language Inference Task, Document-Level NLI, Legal Contract Review, Contract-Focused AI System, Evidence Identification Task, Legal NLP Benchmark, Contract Understanding Task, Hypothesis Verification Task, Stanford NLP, Legal Language Processing.

---