Statistical Classification Abstention Policy
(Redirected from selective prediction policy)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
A Statistical Classification Abstention Policy is a selective risk-based classification decision policy that can be implemented by a classification abstention system to determine when to abstain from prediction or escalate to human review based on prediction confidence thresholds.
- AKA: Reject Option Policy, Classification Deferral Policy, Selective Prediction Policy, Abstention Rule.
- Context:
- It can typically optimize Classification Coverage through confidence threshold tuning and risk-coverage curves.
- It can typically minimize Misclassification Costs through abstention-error trade-offs and cost-sensitive thresholds.
- It can typically support Human-in-the-Loop Systems through escalation routing and review priority queues.
- It can typically enable Reliable Predictions through uncertainty quantification and calibration methods.
- It can typically facilitate Adaptive Learning through abstention feedback loops and active learning strategies.
- ...
- It can often integrate Confidence Estimation Methods through probability calibration and ensemble uncertainty.
- It can often support Multi-Class Classification through class-specific thresholds and hierarchical abstention.
- It can often enable Cost-Sensitive Decisions through asymmetric loss functions and utility maximization.
- It can often facilitate Online Adaptation through dynamic threshold adjustment and drift detection.
- ...
- It can range from being a Simple Statistical Classification Abstention Policy to being a Complex Statistical Classification Abstention Policy, depending on its abstention decision complexity.
- It can range from being a Fixed-Threshold Statistical Classification Abstention Policy to being an Adaptive Statistical Classification Abstention Policy, depending on its abstention threshold flexibility.
- It can range from being a Conservative Statistical Classification Abstention Policy to being an Aggressive Statistical Classification Abstention Policy, depending on its abstention coverage target.
- It can range from being a Binary Statistical Classification Abstention Policy to being a Multi-Class Statistical Classification Abstention Policy, depending on its classification problem scope.
- It can range from being a Symmetric Statistical Classification Abstention Policy to being an Asymmetric Statistical Classification Abstention Policy, depending on its class-specific abstention rules.
- ...
- It can integrate with Machine Learning Models for prediction confidence extraction.
- It can connect to Human Review Systems for abstained case routing.
- It can interface with Performance Monitoring Systems for abstention rate tracking.
- It can communicate with Active Learning Systems for strategic sample selection.
- It can synchronize with Quality Assurance Systems for prediction reliability verification.
- ...
- Examples:
- Threshold-Based Policies, such as:
- Confidence Threshold Policies, such as:
- Margin-Based Policies, such as:
- Learning-Based Policies, such as:
- Learned Rejection Policies, such as:
- Meta-Learning Policies, such as:
- Application-Specific Policies, such as:
- Medical Diagnosis Policies, such as:
- Financial Policies, such as:
- ...
- Threshold-Based Policies, such as:
- Counter-Examples:
- Forced Classification Policy, which lacks abstention option.
- Random Sampling Policy, which lacks confidence-based selection.
- Static Rule System, which lacks probabilistic decision making.
- See: Selective Prediction, Confidence Estimation, Risk-Coverage Curve, Human-in-the-Loop System, Classification with Reject Option, Uncertainty Quantification, Active Learning, Cost-Sensitive Learning, Reliable Machine Learning.