Composite Performance Measure

A Composite Performance Measure is a multi-dimensional performance measure that combines multiple evaluation metrics (providing holistic model assessment through integrated measure calculation).

• AKA: Multi-Metric Performance Measure, Aggregate Performance Score, Combined Model Metric.
• Context:
  • It can (typically) integrate Classification Metrics including composite accuracy, composite precision, and composite recall.
  • It can (typically) combine Statistical Measures through composite weighted averages and composite harmonic means.
  • It can (typically) implement Normalization Techniques for composite metric scaling and composite range alignment.
  • It can (typically) establish Weighting Schemes based on composite business priorities.
  • It can (typically) provide Unified Score Interpretation across composite metric dimensions.
  • It can (typically) support Trade-Off Analysis between composite competing metrics.
  • It can (typically) enable Threshold Optimization for composite decision boundaries.
  • ...
  • It can (often) include Domain-Specific Weights reflecting composite industry standards.
  • It can (often) incorporate Confidence Intervals for composite uncertainty quantification.
  • It can (often) provide Sensitivity Analysis showing composite metric contributions.
  • It can (often) support Dynamic Weighting adapting to composite context changes.
  • It can (often) enable Multi-Objective Optimization balancing composite metric goals.
  • It can (often) implement Robust Aggregation handling composite outlier metrics.
  • ...
  • It can range from being a Simple Composite Measure to being a Complex Composite Measure, depending on its composite metric count.
  • It can range from being a Static Composite Measure to being a Adaptive Composite Measure, depending on its composite weight flexibility.
  • It can range from being a Linear Composite Measure to being a Non-Linear Composite Measure, depending on its composite aggregation function.
  • It can range from being a Binary Composite Measure to being a Continuous Composite Measure, depending on its composite score range.
  • It can range from being a Interpretable Composite Measure to being a Black-Box Composite Measure, depending on its composite transparency level.
  • ...
  • It can be calculated by Scoring Functions implementing composite aggregation logic.
  • It can utilize Statistical Libraries for composite computation.
  • It can integrate with Evaluation Frameworks for composite metric collection.
  • It can employ Optimization Algorithms for composite weight tuning.
  • It can leverage Visualization Tools for composite score presentation.
  • ...
• Example(s):
  • Standard Composite Measures, such as:
    • F1 Score combining precision and recall via harmonic mean.
    • Matthews Correlation Coefficient balancing true positives and true negatives.
    • Balanced Accuracy averaging sensitivity and specificity.
  • Business-Oriented Composite Measures, such as:
    • Revenue-Weighted Accuracy combining prediction accuracy with business impact.
    • Cost-Sensitive Score integrating error costs with performance metrics.
    • Customer Satisfaction Index merging model performance with user feedback.
  • Multi-Task Composite Measures, such as:
    • Task-Averaged Performance aggregating across multiple task metrics.
    • Weighted Task Score prioritizing critical task performance.
    • Pareto-Optimal Metric balancing competing task objectives.
  • Domain-Specific Composite Measures, such as:
    • Clinical Performance Score combining sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value.
    • Financial Risk Score integrating accuracy, coverage, and stability metrics.
    • Search Quality Metric merging precision, recall, and ranking quality.
  • Advanced Composite Measures, such as:
    • Area Under Multiple Curves combining ROC, PR, and cost curves.
    • Ensemble Diversity Score measuring model agreement and performance correlation.
    • Fairness-Aware Metric balancing accuracy with demographic parity.
  • ...
• Counter-Example(s):
  • Single Metric, which evaluates only one performance dimension.
  • Raw Accuracy, which doesn't account for class imbalance.
  • Unweighted Average, which treats all metrics equally without priority consideration.
  • Maximum Score, which selects the best single metric without aggregation.
  • Qualitative Assessment, which uses subjective judgment without quantitative combination.
• See: Performance Measure, Performance Assessment Framework, F-Measure, Multi-Objective Optimization, Weighted Average, Harmonic Mean, Score Aggregation, Metric Fusion, Evaluation Metric, Composite Index, Balanced Scorecard, Model Evaluation System.

---