Sparse Autoencoder Network

From GM-RKB
Jump to navigation Jump to search

A Sparse Autoencoder Network is an autoencoder network that incorporates a sparsity constraint on the hidden units during training, forcing the sparse autoencoder model to learn a sparse representation of the input data.

  • Context:
  • Example(s):
    • by Sparsity Constraint Techniques:
      • A k-Sparse Autoencoder that clamps all but the highest-k activations to zero.
        • This technique enforces sparsity by keeping only the k most active hidden units and setting the rest to zero.
        • It effectively limits the number of active neurons, leading to a sparse representation.
        • The value of k is a hyperparameter that determines the level of sparsity in the autoencoder.
      • A L1 Sparse Autoencoder that minimizes the L1 norm of the activations to enforce sparsity.
        • This approach adds an L1 regularization term to the loss function, which encourages the activations to be sparse.
        • The L1 norm promotes sparsity by penalizing non-zero activations, effectively pushing many activations towards zero.
        • The strength of the L1 regularization is controlled by a hyperparameter that balances reconstruction error and sparsity.
    • by Neural Network Architecture variation:s
      • A Stacked Autoencoder.
        • Stacked autoencoders consist of multiple layers of autoencoders, where the output of one layer serves as the input to the next layer.
        • This hierarchical structure allows for learning high-level features and abstractions from the input data.
        • Sparse constraints can be applied to each layer of the stacked autoencoder to promote sparsity throughout the network.
      • A Deep Sparse Autoencoder that combines multiple layers of sparse encodings.
        • Deep sparse autoencoders extend the concept of stacked autoencoders by incorporating sparsity constraints in each layer.
        • By applying sparsity to multiple layers, the autoencoder can learn hierarchical sparse representations.
        • The depth of the autoencoder and the level of sparsity in each layer can be adjusted to capture complex patterns in the data.
      • A Convolutional Sparse Autoencoder that applies sparse constraints to convolutional layers.
        • Convolutional sparse autoencoders combine the concepts of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and sparse autoencoders.
        • Instead of fully connected layers, convolutional layers are used to capture spatial dependencies in the input data.
        • Sparse constraints are applied to the activations of the convolutional layers to promote sparsity in the learned features.
        • This approach is particularly useful for tasks involving image or video data, where spatial information is crucial.
    • ...
  • Counter-Example(s):
    • Denoising Autoencoders, which focus on reconstructing clean data from noisy inputs rather than enforcing sparsity.
    • Variational Autoencoders, which aim to learn a probabilistic distribution over the latent space instead of sparse representations.
    • ...
  • See: Relaxation (Approximation), Kullback–Leibler Divergence, Sparse Coding, Rectifier (Neural Networks).

References

2024

  • (Wikipedia, 2024) ⇒ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autoencoder#Sparse_autoencoder Retrieved:2024-5-23.
    • Inspired by the sparse coding hypothesis in neuroscience, sparse autoencoders are variants of autoencoders, such that the codes [math]\displaystyle{ E_\phi(x) }[/math] for messages tend to be sparse codes, that is, [math]\displaystyle{ E_\phi(x) }[/math] is close to zero in most entries. Sparse autoencoders may include more (rather than fewer) hidden units than inputs, but only a small number of the hidden units are allowed to be active at the same time.[1] Encouraging sparsity improves performance on classification tasks.[2]

      There are two main ways to enforce sparsity. One way is to simply clamp all but the highest-k activations of the latent code to zero. This is the k-sparse autoencoder.[3]

      The k-sparse autoencoder inserts the following "k-sparse function" in the latent layer of a standard autoencoder:[math]\displaystyle{ f_k(x_1, ..., x_n) = (x_1 b_1, ..., x_n b_n) }[/math]where [math]\displaystyle{ b_i = 1 }[/math] if [math]\displaystyle{ |x_i| }[/math] ranks in the top k, and 0 otherwise.

      Backpropagating through [math]\displaystyle{ f_k }[/math] is simple: set gradient to 0 for [math]\displaystyle{ b_i = 0 }[/math] entries, and keep gradient for [math]\displaystyle{ b_i=1 }[/math] entries. This is essentially a generalized ReLU function.[3]

      The other way is a relaxed version of the k-sparse autoencoder. Instead of forcing sparsity, we add a sparsity regularization loss, then optimize for[math]\displaystyle{ \min_{\theta, \phi}L(\theta, \phi) + \lambda L_{sparsity} (\theta, \phi) }[/math]where [math]\displaystyle{ \lambda \gt 0 }[/math] measures how much sparsity we want to enforce.[4]

      Let the autoencoder architecture have [math]\displaystyle{ K }[/math] layers. To define a sparsity regularization loss, we need a "desired" sparsity [math]\displaystyle{ \hat \rho_k }[/math] for each layer, a weight [math]\displaystyle{ w_k }[/math] for how much to enforce each sparsity, and a function [math]\displaystyle{ s: [0, 1]\times [0, 1] \to [0, \infty] }[/math] to measure how much two sparsities differ.

      For each input [math]\displaystyle{ x }[/math] , let the actual sparsity of activation in each layer [math]\displaystyle{ k }[/math] be[math]\displaystyle{ \rho_k(x) = \frac 1n \sum_{i=1}^n a_{k, i}(x) }[/math]where [math]\displaystyle{ a_{k, i}(x) }[/math] is the activation in the [math]\displaystyle{ i }[/math] -th neuron of the [math]\displaystyle{ k }[/math] -th layer upon input [math]\displaystyle{ x }[/math] .

      The sparsity loss upon input [math]\displaystyle{ x }[/math] for one layer is [math]\displaystyle{ s(\hat\rho_k, \rho_k(x)) }[/math] , and the sparsity regularization loss for the entire autoencoder is the expected weighted sum of sparsity losses:[math]\displaystyle{ L_{sparsity}(\theta, \phi) = \mathbb \mathbb E_{x\sim\mu_X}\left[\sum_{k\in 1:K} w_k s(\hat\rho_k, \rho_k(x)) \right] }[/math]Typically, the function [math]\displaystyle{ s }[/math] is either the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence, as[2][4]

       :: [math]\displaystyle{ s(\rho, \hat\rho) = KL(\rho || \hat{\rho}) = \rho \log \frac{\rho}{\hat{\rho}}+(1- \rho)\log \frac{1-\rho}{1-\hat{\rho}} }[/math] or the L1 loss, as [math]\displaystyle{ s(\rho, \hat\rho) = |\rho- \hat\rho| }[/math] , or the L2 loss, as [math]\displaystyle{ s(\rho, \hat\rho) = |\rho- \hat\rho|^2 }[/math] .

      Alternatively, the sparsity regularization loss may be defined without reference to any "desired sparsity", but simply force as much sparsity as possible. In this case, one can define the sparsity regularization loss as [math]\displaystyle{ L_{sparsity}(\theta, \phi) = \mathbb \mathbb E_{x\sim\mu_X}\left[ \lt P\gt \sum_{k\in 1:K} w_k \|h_k\| \lt P\gt \right] }[/math]where [math]\displaystyle{ h_k }[/math] is the activation vector in the [math]\displaystyle{ k }[/math] -th layer of the autoencoder. The norm [math]\displaystyle{ \|\cdot\| }[/math] is usually the L1 norm (giving the L1 sparse autoencoder) or the L2 norm (giving the L2 sparse autoencoder).

  1. ↑ Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named domingos
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named :5
  3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named :1
  4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 Ng, A. (2011). Sparse autoencoder. CS294A Lecture notes, 72(2011), 1-19.

2024

2024

  • Perplexity
    • A sparse autoencoder is a type of autoencoder that incorporates a sparsity constraint on the hidden units during training. This constraint forces the model to learn a sparse representation of the input data, meaning that only a small number of neurons are active at any given time. This sparsity is typically achieved by adding a penalty term to the loss function, which discourages the activation of too many neurons simultaneously.
    • Key Characteristics of Sparse Autoencoders
    • Sparsity Constraint: Sparse autoencoders introduce a sparsity constraint on the activations of neurons in the hidden layers. This is often implemented using a penalty term in the loss function, such as the Kullback–Leibler divergence (KL divergence), which measures the difference between the desired sparsity level and the actual average activation of the neurons[1][3][4][7][9].
    • *Loss Function*: The loss function of a sparse autoencoder typically includes two components: the reconstruction loss and the sparsity loss. The reconstruction loss measures the difference between the input and the reconstructed output, while the sparsity loss ensures that the activations of the hidden units remain sparse. The combined loss function can be represented as: [math]\displaystyle{ L_{\text{SAE}}(X, X') = \min \left( \Vert X - X'\Vert _F^2 + \lambda \text{KL}(p \parallel q) \right) }[/math] where [math]\displaystyle{ \text{KL}(p \parallel q) }[/math] calculates the Kullback–Leibler divergence between a target sparsity parameter [math]\displaystyle{ p }[/math] and the estimated average activation [math]\displaystyle{ q }[/math] of each neuron during training[1][3][4].
    • *Applications*: Sparse autoencoders are used in various applications, including feature extraction, anomaly detection, and data denoising. They are particularly useful in scenarios where it is important to filter out noise and irrelevant features, thereby learning more meaningful and compact representations of the data[4][7][8][9].
    • Comparison with Other Autoencoders: Unlike standard autoencoders, which do not impose any constraints on the hidden layer activations, sparse autoencoders specifically aim to limit the number of active neurons. This makes them different from other types of autoencoders like denoising autoencoders, which are designed to reconstruct clean data from noisy inputs, and variational autoencoders, which generate new data samples by learning a probabilistic distribution of the latent space[4][8][9][16].
    • Advantages:
      • Noise Filtering: The sparsity constraint helps in filtering out noise and irrelevant features during the encoding process, leading to more robust feature extraction[4][8].
      • Meaningful Features: Sparse autoencoders often learn important and meaningful features due to their emphasis on sparse activations[4][8].
    • Disadvantages:
      • Hyperparameter Sensitivity: The performance of sparse autoencoders is highly dependent on the choice of hyperparameters, such as the sparsity penalty term and the target sparsity level[4][8].
      • Computational Complexity: The application of sparsity constraints increases the computational complexity of training the model[4][8].
    • Conclusion
      • Sparse autoencoders are a powerful tool in machine learning for learning compact and meaningful representations of data. By enforcing sparsity constraints, they can effectively filter out noise and irrelevant features, making them useful for a variety of applications, including feature extraction, anomaly detection, and data denoising. However, their performance is highly dependent on the careful tuning of hyperparameters and can be computationally intensive.
    • Citations:
[1] https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10462-023-10662-6
[2] https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/118199/what-are-the-differences-between-sparse-coding-and-autoencoder
[3] https://web.stanford.edu/class/archive/cs/cs294a/cs294a.1104/sparseAutoencoder.pdf
[4] https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/auto-encoders/
[5] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EmmLvsljmrk
[6] https://web.stanford.edu/class/cs294a/sparseAutoencoder.pdf
[7] https://viso.ai/deep-learning/autoencoder/
[8] https://blog.gopenai.com/an-introduction-to-autoencoders-types-applications-and-working-a66d9599e172?gi=c8abc4f5cceb
[9] https://www.datacamp.com/tutorial/introduction-to-autoencoders
[10] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vfnxKO2rMq4
[11] https://deepai.org/machine-learning-glossary-and-terms/autoencoder
[12] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8CMtT5dRvqg
[13] https://blog.metaflow.fr/sparse-coding-a-simple-exploration-152a3c900a7c?gi=feae3b75629c
[14] https://www.v7labs.com/blog/autoencoders-guide
[15] https://www.tutorialspoint.com/what-are-the-applications-of-autoencoders
[16] https://towardsdatascience.com/difference-between-autoencoder-ae-and-variational-autoencoder-vae-ed7be1c038f2
[17] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/51695367/what-is-the-difference-between-the-denoising-autoencoder-and-the-conventional-au
[18] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IK6iYk5jYbE
[19] https://ai.stackexchange.com/questions/36118/is-plain-autoencoder-a-generative-model
[20] https://towardsdatascience.com/6-applications-of-auto-encoders-every-data-scientist-should-know-dc703cbc892b

2013

2011

  • (Ng, 2011) ⇒ Andrew Ng. (2011). "Sparse Autoencoder." Lecture Notes, Stanford Machine Learning (CS229). Stanford University. [2]
    • NOTE: It provides influential course materials on sparse autoencoders, widely used for educational purposes.

2008

2006

1997

  • (Olshausen & Field, 1997) ⇒ Bruno A. Olshausen, and David J. Field. (1997). "Sparse Coding with an Overcomplete Basis Set: A Strategy Employed by V1?" In: *Vision Research*, Volume 37, Pages 3311-3325. [doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00169-7]
    • NOTE: It discusses the foundational concepts of sparse coding relevant to sparse autoencoders.
Retrieved from "http://www.gabormelli.com/RKB/index.php?title=Sparse_Autoencoder_Network&oldid=885209"