Meta-Learning Paradigm

A Meta-Learning Paradigm is a machine learning paradigm that defines how algorithm components can improve their ability to learn new tasks by leveraging prior experience across task distributions.

• AKA: Learning to Learn, Adaptive Learning.
• Context:
  • It defines a learning strategy where models are trained to adapt quickly to new tasks using minimal data.
  • It can be implemented through optimization-based methods (e.g., Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning), metric-based methods (e.g., Prototypical Networks), or model-based methods (e.g., Memory-Augmented Neural Networks).
  • It can support few-shot learning, continual learning, and automated machine learning.
  • It can operate over distributions of tasks to generalize beyond individual task performance.
  • It can involve a bi-level learning process, where a meta-learner guides the learning of base-learners.
  • It can help overcome limitations of traditional supervised learning in data-scarce scenarios.
  • It can be framed within the context of multi-task learning or transfer learning, but differs by explicitly optimizing for generalization across tasks.
  • It can be used to learn model architectures, hyperparameters, or loss functions, making it valuable for AutoML.
  • It can range from using simple gradient-based inner/outer loop updates to using neural controllers for rapid task adaptation.
  • It can be sensitive to the choice of task sampling, initialization, and generalization assumptions across meta-train and meta-test distributions.
  • ...
• Example(s):
  • Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning, which optimizes for rapid adaptation using gradient descent.
  • Prototypical Networks, which learn a metric space where classification can be performed by comparing to class prototypes.
  • Reptile, a first-order approximation to MAML for improved scalability.
  • Memory-Augmented Neural Networks, which incorporate external memory for fast recall and adaptation.
  • LEO (Latent Embedding Optimization), which operates in a low-dimensional latent space for meta-learning.
  • ...
• Counter-Example(s):
  • Transfer Learning methods, which adapt from a source task to a target task but do not explicitly optimize a learning process.
  • Hyperparameter Optimization techniques, which tune model parameters for a single task rather than generalizing across tasks.
  • Regular Supervised Learning pipelines, which assume fixed tasks and do not leverage cross-task experience.
  • ...
• See: Metalearning Task, Metalearning System, Metalearning Algorithm, Metalearning Benchmark, Few-shot learning, Multi-task learning, Transfer learning, Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning, Prototypical Networks, AutoML, Memory-Augmented Neural Networks, Metaheuristic, Machine Learning, Meta-Data, Learning Algorithms, Inductive Bias, Data Mining, Database, Inductive Transfer.

---

---

References

2025a

• (GeeksforGeeks, 2025) ⇒ "Advances in Meta-Learning (Learning to Learn)". In:GeeksforGeeks. Retrieved: 2025-06-9.
  • QUOTE: Metalearning enables AI systems to learn new tasks with minimal data by leveraging prior knowledge from related tasks. Recent advances include the development of meta-optimization, few-shot learning, and task-agnostic approaches.

2025b

• (DataCamp, 2025) ⇒ "Meta-Learning: The Next Step in Machine Learning". In: DataCamp. Retrieved: 2025-06-9.
  • QUOTE: Metalearning focuses on building models that can adapt and generalize across diverse tasks. This paradigm is crucial for the development of general-purpose AI and has applications in recommendation systems, computer vision, and natural language processing.

2020

• (Hospedales et al., 2020) ⇒ Timothy Hospedales, Antreas Antoniou, Paul Micaelli, & Amos Storkey. (2020). "Meta-Learning in Neural Networks: A Survey". In: arXiv Preprint.
  • QUOTE: Metalearning (or learning-to-learn) aims to improve the learning algorithm itself by leveraging experience from multiple learning episodes. Unlike conventional approaches where each task is solved from scratch, metalearning enables models to generalize and adapt quickly to new tasks, addressing challenges such as data scarcity and poor generalization. The survey covers definitions, taxonomy, applications (e.g., few-shot learning, reinforcement learning), and open research challenges in the field."

    "Metalearning is positioned with respect to related areas such as transfer learning and hyperparameter optimization, and provides a comprehensive breakdown of current methodologies and their applications.

2020b

• (Peng, 2020) ⇒ Huimin Peng. (2020). "A Comprehensive Overview and Survey of Recent Advances in Meta-Learning". In: arXiv Preprint.
  • QUOTE: Metalearning (also known as learning-to-learn) seeks rapid and accurate model adaptation to unseen tasks, enabling highly autonomous AI and robust few-shot learning. Unlike standard deep learning, which focuses on in-sample prediction, metalearning targets model adaptation for out-of-sample prediction and continual self-improvement. Methodologies include black-box meta-learning, metric-based meta-learning, layered meta-learning, and Bayesian meta-learning."

    "Recent advances integrate metalearning with other machine learning frameworks for complex, real-world problem solving and highlight future research directions.

2018a

• (Weng, 2018) ⇒ Lilian Weng. (2018). "Meta-Learning: Learning to Learn". In: Lilian Weng Blog.
  • QUOTE: Metalearning is a subfield of machine learning in which models are trained to quickly adapt to new tasks using limited data. Major approaches include optimization-based, metric-based, and model-based meta-learning. Applications span few-shot classification, reinforcement learning, and hyperparameter tuning."

    "The field is motivated by the need for models that can generalize across tasks and learn efficiently from small datasets.

2018b

• (Wikipedia, 2018) ⇒ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meta_learning_(computer_science) Retrieved:2018-4-8.
  • Meta learning is a subfield of machine learning where automatic learning algorithms are applied on metadata about machine learning experiments. As of 2017 the term had not found a standard interpretation, however the main goal is to use such metadata to understand how automatic learning can become flexible in solving learning problems, hence to improve the performance of existing learning algorithms or to learn (induce) the learning algorithm itself, hence the alternative term learning to learn.

    Flexibility is important because each learning algorithm is based on a set of assumptions about the data, its inductive bias. This means that it will only learn well if the bias matches the learning problem. A learning algorithm may perform very well in one domain, but not on the next. This poses strong restrictions on the use of machine learning or data mining techniques, since the relationship between the learning problem (often some kind of database) and the effectiveness of different learning algorithms is not yet understood.

    By using different kinds of metadata, like properties of the learning problem, algorithm properties (like performance measures), or patterns previously derived from the data, it is possible to learn, select, alter or combine different learning algorithms to effectively solve a given learning problem. Critiques of meta learning approaches bear a strong resemblance to the critique of metaheuristic, a possibly related problem. A good analogy to meta-learning, and the inspiration for Bengio et al.'s early work (1991), considers that genetic evolution learns the learning procedure encoded in genes and executed in each individual's brain.

2017a

• (Brazdil et al. 2017) ⇒ Brazdil P., Vilalta R., Giraud-Carrier C., Soares C. (2017) Metalearning. In: Sammut, C., Webb, G.I. (eds) Encyclopedia of Machine Learning and Data Mining. Springer, Boston, MA
  • ABSTRACT: In the area machine learning / data mining many diverse algorithms are available nowadays and hence the selection of the most suitable algorithm may be a challenge. This is aggravated by the fact that many algorithms require that certain parameters be set. If a wrong algorithm and/or parameter configuration is selected, substandard results may be obtained. The topic of metalearning aims to facilitate this task. Metalearning typically proceeds in two phases. First, a given set of algorithms A (e.g. classification algorithms) and datasets D is identified and different pairs < ai,dj > from these two sets are chosen for testing. The dataset di is described by certain meta-features which together with the performance result of algorithm AI constitute a part of the metadata. In the second phase the metadata is used to construct a model, usually again with recourse to machine learning methods. The model represents a generalization of various base-level experiments. The model can then be applied to the new dataset to recommend the most suitable algorithm or a ranking ordered by relative performance. This article provides more details about this area. Besides, it discusses also how the method can be combined with hyperparameter optimization and extended to sequences of operations (workflows).

2017b

• (Finn, 2017) ⇒ Chris Finn. (2017). "Training Meta-Learning Models". In: Stanford CS Blog.
  • QUOTE: Training metalearning models involves exposing a base learner to a variety of tasks and updating its parameters to improve generalization and adaptability. The process includes meta-training and meta-testing phases, where the model learns common patterns during meta-training and is evaluated on novel tasks during meta-testing.

---